{"title":"测量逆向思维:概念框架和规模验证","authors":"Trystan Loustau , Brooke Magnus , Gregg Sparkman","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total <em>N</em> = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring contrarianism: Conceptual framework and scale validation\",\"authors\":\"Trystan Loustau , Brooke Magnus , Gregg Sparkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total <em>N</em> = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring contrarianism: Conceptual framework and scale validation
The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total N = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.