测量逆向思维:概念框架和规模验证

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Trystan Loustau , Brooke Magnus , Gregg Sparkman
{"title":"测量逆向思维:概念框架和规模验证","authors":"Trystan Loustau ,&nbsp;Brooke Magnus ,&nbsp;Gregg Sparkman","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total <em>N</em> = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring contrarianism: Conceptual framework and scale validation\",\"authors\":\"Trystan Loustau ,&nbsp;Brooke Magnus ,&nbsp;Gregg Sparkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total <em>N</em> = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003587\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“逆势者”一词通常指那些“逆潮流而动”的人。尽管许多传统的心理智慧都关注于从众的倾向(例如,群体思维、从众、社会规范),但人们也会积极抵制社会压力,偏离社会规范。逆势主义是指一个人在信仰、态度和行为上偏离主流的程度,它在塑造社会变革中起着关键作用。虽然其他构念衡量对直接请求、他人愿望或命令的依从性(例如,宜人性、抗拒性),但迄今为止没有构念关注一个人偏离环境中观察到的规范的倾向或频率。在6项高强度研究(总N = 2434)中,我们开发并验证了逆向思维量表(21项,单因素)和6个补充量表,用于测量逆向思维分类的4个关键维度和逆向思维的5个近端动机。该量表具有较高的内部信度和重测信度、相关心理特征的趋同效度和发散效度,以及预测现实世界逆向思维信念和行为的能力。这些量表使研究人员和其他专业人员能够研究个人层面的逆向行为的心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring contrarianism: Conceptual framework and scale validation
The term “contrarian” often refers to those who “go against the grain”. Although many pieces of conventional psychological wisdom focus on the tendency to conform (e.g., groupthink, conformity, social norms), people also actively resist social pressure and deviate from social norms. Contrarianism, the extent to which someone adopts beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that diverge from the mainstream, plays a key role in shaping social change. While other constructs measure compliance to direct requests, others' wishes or commands (e.g., agreeableness, reactance), no construct to date hones in on the tendency to or frequency with which one deviates from observed norms in one's environment. Across six high-powered studies (total N = 2434), we developed and validated the Contrarianism Scale (21-items, single factor) for measuring trait contrarianism and six supplemental scales for measuring four key dimensions for classifying contrarianism and five proximal motives for contrarianism. We provide evidence of the scale's high internal and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity from relevant psychological traits, and power for predicting real-world contrarianism beliefs and behaviors. These scales enable researchers and other professionals to study the psychological effects of individual-level contrarianism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信