Junlong Ye , Lufeng Zhao , Liang Guo , Yinghan Liu , Dalv Chen , Lei He , Jianjun Tang , Liangliang Hu , Xin Chen
{"title":"种内性状变异在不同空间安排下调节间作生产力","authors":"Junlong Ye , Lufeng Zhao , Liang Guo , Yinghan Liu , Dalv Chen , Lei He , Jianjun Tang , Liangliang Hu , Xin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Functional traits have advanced our comprehension of crop-crop interactions and intercropping outcomes. Nonetheless, the role of intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in influencing intercropping productivity across various spatial arrangements has received little attention. This study examined three aspects of crop ITV (i.e., the plastic variation in trait means, trait range, and trait coordination) in a field experiment on maize (<em>Zea mays</em>)-pepper (<em>Capsicum annuum</em>) strip intercropping. We set up different spatial arrangements with maize to pepper row ratios of 2:2 (M2P2), 2:4 (M2P4), and 2:6 (M2P6). Results indicated that M2P4 was the only spatial arrangement to achieve overyielding (mean LER = 1.09, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Intercropped maize consistently exhibited competitive advantages, but pepper displayed significant variability in biomass under different spatial arrangements. Compared to monoculture, intercropping increased the mean values of plant height and leaf area in maize (by 5.83 % and 4.67 % on average, respectively, <em>p</em> < 0.05), but had minimal influence on trait range and trait coordination of maize. However, intercropping significantly increased the mean values of 6 out of the 11 traits (<em>p</em> < 0.05) with a significant decrease in root diameter (<em>p</em> < 0.01), magnified trait range (by 26.5 % - 58.8 %, <em>p</em> < 0.05), and diminished trait coordination (especially M2P2 and M2P6, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Structural equation model analyses showed that plastic variation in trait means benefited the biomass of maize, but an increased trait range and elevated trait coordination favored the biomass of pepper. All three aspects of ITV functioned as effective mediators of the effect of spatial arrangement on crop-crop competition and intercropping productivity. Our findings suggest that intraspecific trait variation has considerable implications for the design of species-diversified agroecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 109911"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraspecific trait variation mediates intercropping productivity under different spatial arrangements\",\"authors\":\"Junlong Ye , Lufeng Zhao , Liang Guo , Yinghan Liu , Dalv Chen , Lei He , Jianjun Tang , Liangliang Hu , Xin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Functional traits have advanced our comprehension of crop-crop interactions and intercropping outcomes. Nonetheless, the role of intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in influencing intercropping productivity across various spatial arrangements has received little attention. This study examined three aspects of crop ITV (i.e., the plastic variation in trait means, trait range, and trait coordination) in a field experiment on maize (<em>Zea mays</em>)-pepper (<em>Capsicum annuum</em>) strip intercropping. We set up different spatial arrangements with maize to pepper row ratios of 2:2 (M2P2), 2:4 (M2P4), and 2:6 (M2P6). Results indicated that M2P4 was the only spatial arrangement to achieve overyielding (mean LER = 1.09, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Intercropped maize consistently exhibited competitive advantages, but pepper displayed significant variability in biomass under different spatial arrangements. Compared to monoculture, intercropping increased the mean values of plant height and leaf area in maize (by 5.83 % and 4.67 % on average, respectively, <em>p</em> < 0.05), but had minimal influence on trait range and trait coordination of maize. However, intercropping significantly increased the mean values of 6 out of the 11 traits (<em>p</em> < 0.05) with a significant decrease in root diameter (<em>p</em> < 0.01), magnified trait range (by 26.5 % - 58.8 %, <em>p</em> < 0.05), and diminished trait coordination (especially M2P2 and M2P6, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Structural equation model analyses showed that plastic variation in trait means benefited the biomass of maize, but an increased trait range and elevated trait coordination favored the biomass of pepper. All three aspects of ITV functioned as effective mediators of the effect of spatial arrangement on crop-crop competition and intercropping productivity. Our findings suggest that intraspecific trait variation has considerable implications for the design of species-diversified agroecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004438\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraspecific trait variation mediates intercropping productivity under different spatial arrangements
Functional traits have advanced our comprehension of crop-crop interactions and intercropping outcomes. Nonetheless, the role of intraspecific trait variation (ITV) in influencing intercropping productivity across various spatial arrangements has received little attention. This study examined three aspects of crop ITV (i.e., the plastic variation in trait means, trait range, and trait coordination) in a field experiment on maize (Zea mays)-pepper (Capsicum annuum) strip intercropping. We set up different spatial arrangements with maize to pepper row ratios of 2:2 (M2P2), 2:4 (M2P4), and 2:6 (M2P6). Results indicated that M2P4 was the only spatial arrangement to achieve overyielding (mean LER = 1.09, p < 0.05). Intercropped maize consistently exhibited competitive advantages, but pepper displayed significant variability in biomass under different spatial arrangements. Compared to monoculture, intercropping increased the mean values of plant height and leaf area in maize (by 5.83 % and 4.67 % on average, respectively, p < 0.05), but had minimal influence on trait range and trait coordination of maize. However, intercropping significantly increased the mean values of 6 out of the 11 traits (p < 0.05) with a significant decrease in root diameter (p < 0.01), magnified trait range (by 26.5 % - 58.8 %, p < 0.05), and diminished trait coordination (especially M2P2 and M2P6, p < 0.05). Structural equation model analyses showed that plastic variation in trait means benefited the biomass of maize, but an increased trait range and elevated trait coordination favored the biomass of pepper. All three aspects of ITV functioned as effective mediators of the effect of spatial arrangement on crop-crop competition and intercropping productivity. Our findings suggest that intraspecific trait variation has considerable implications for the design of species-diversified agroecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.