{"title":"上阿拉斯盆地(NE trkiye)地遗产元素资源评价方法——基于区间粗糙数(irn)的决策模型","authors":"Kuttusi Zorlu , Volkan Dede , Yahya Öztürk , Burçin Şeyda Çorba , İbrahim Kopar , Soner Serin","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geoheritage elements are significant geological resources that provide scientific, educational, and touristic usage and contribute to socio-economic development. To protect these resources sustainably, effective policies are necessary. This study focuses on the Upper Aras Basin in northeast Türkiye, employing a multi-criteria model to assess geoheritage potential. We used the combined models SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution), which are based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRN), for this study's methods. This approach addresses uncertainties that may arise in the assessment of geoheritage elements using IRN, facilitating group decision-making for their management. In the study, geosites in the basin were classified according to six different categories of geoheritage types. In addition, their importance was determined at the global, national, regional, and local levels. According to the analysis results, G14 (Tuzluca Rainbow Hills, Sinkholes and Ichnofossils), G8 (Ani Ruins and Rock Houses), G15 (Kağızman Basalt Columns), G21 (Yazılıkaya Rock Paintings) and G2 (Akçakale Island and Historical Settlement) ranked first as the five most important geosites. In the study, inferences regarding establishing legal basis and grounds, inventory evaluation, the creation of geoparks, and sustainable use of resources were formulated to create an effective geoconservation policy in Türkiye and the field. Additionally, it discusses the scientific, educational, and touristic potential of geoheritage resources under a sustainable use policy. By integrating multiple expert opinions, the methodology effectively evaluates and ranks geosites, demonstrating its usefulness in assessing the significance of these resources. Overall, the findings aim to promote effective management and conservation of geoheritage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105724"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to assessment of geoheritage elements determined in the Upper Aras Basin (NE Türkiye) as resources: A decision-making model based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRNs)\",\"authors\":\"Kuttusi Zorlu , Volkan Dede , Yahya Öztürk , Burçin Şeyda Çorba , İbrahim Kopar , Soner Serin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Geoheritage elements are significant geological resources that provide scientific, educational, and touristic usage and contribute to socio-economic development. To protect these resources sustainably, effective policies are necessary. This study focuses on the Upper Aras Basin in northeast Türkiye, employing a multi-criteria model to assess geoheritage potential. We used the combined models SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution), which are based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRN), for this study's methods. This approach addresses uncertainties that may arise in the assessment of geoheritage elements using IRN, facilitating group decision-making for their management. In the study, geosites in the basin were classified according to six different categories of geoheritage types. In addition, their importance was determined at the global, national, regional, and local levels. According to the analysis results, G14 (Tuzluca Rainbow Hills, Sinkholes and Ichnofossils), G8 (Ani Ruins and Rock Houses), G15 (Kağızman Basalt Columns), G21 (Yazılıkaya Rock Paintings) and G2 (Akçakale Island and Historical Settlement) ranked first as the five most important geosites. In the study, inferences regarding establishing legal basis and grounds, inventory evaluation, the creation of geoparks, and sustainable use of resources were formulated to create an effective geoconservation policy in Türkiye and the field. Additionally, it discusses the scientific, educational, and touristic potential of geoheritage resources under a sustainable use policy. By integrating multiple expert opinions, the methodology effectively evaluates and ranks geosites, demonstrating its usefulness in assessing the significance of these resources. Overall, the findings aim to promote effective management and conservation of geoheritage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002661\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An approach to assessment of geoheritage elements determined in the Upper Aras Basin (NE Türkiye) as resources: A decision-making model based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRNs)
Geoheritage elements are significant geological resources that provide scientific, educational, and touristic usage and contribute to socio-economic development. To protect these resources sustainably, effective policies are necessary. This study focuses on the Upper Aras Basin in northeast Türkiye, employing a multi-criteria model to assess geoheritage potential. We used the combined models SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution), which are based on Interval Rough Numbers (IRN), for this study's methods. This approach addresses uncertainties that may arise in the assessment of geoheritage elements using IRN, facilitating group decision-making for their management. In the study, geosites in the basin were classified according to six different categories of geoheritage types. In addition, their importance was determined at the global, national, regional, and local levels. According to the analysis results, G14 (Tuzluca Rainbow Hills, Sinkholes and Ichnofossils), G8 (Ani Ruins and Rock Houses), G15 (Kağızman Basalt Columns), G21 (Yazılıkaya Rock Paintings) and G2 (Akçakale Island and Historical Settlement) ranked first as the five most important geosites. In the study, inferences regarding establishing legal basis and grounds, inventory evaluation, the creation of geoparks, and sustainable use of resources were formulated to create an effective geoconservation policy in Türkiye and the field. Additionally, it discusses the scientific, educational, and touristic potential of geoheritage resources under a sustainable use policy. By integrating multiple expert opinions, the methodology effectively evaluates and ranks geosites, demonstrating its usefulness in assessing the significance of these resources. Overall, the findings aim to promote effective management and conservation of geoheritage.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.