{"title":"解决能源三难困境:中国电力市场改革的进展与评价","authors":"Jiale Li , Guodong Li , Feng Song , Yanbo Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the growing global emphasis on energy transition, achieving the simultaneous goals of accessibility, reliability, and sustainability—commonly referred to as the “energy trilemma”—has become a central challenge in the energy sector. As the world's largest electricity consumer, China has launched two rounds of power market reforms in 2002 and 2015 to address the trilemma challenges in the electricity sector. However, significant regional disparities in reform progress persist. This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the performance of 26 provincial electricity markets under the State Grid across three key dimensions: energy affordability, supply security, and environmental sustainability. The findings indicate that electricity market reforms have advanced across all provinces, with relatively small variations in progress observed at the provincial level. However, achieving a balance among multiple objectives remains a challenge. Composite scores range from 86.5 to 93.4, with 88 % of provinces scoring above 90 in supply security, but greater variation is observed in environmental sustainability (scores ranging from 82.4 to 92.9). Notably, while spot markets have contributed to enhancing efficiency, they could potentially undermine supply security, and some power-exporting provinces are unexpectedly facing certain supply security risks. This study provides important policy insights into how electricity market reform can better align with China's energy transition strategy, ensuring coordinated and sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the energy trilemma: Progress and evaluation of electricity market reform in China\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Li , Guodong Li , Feng Song , Yanbo Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the growing global emphasis on energy transition, achieving the simultaneous goals of accessibility, reliability, and sustainability—commonly referred to as the “energy trilemma”—has become a central challenge in the energy sector. As the world's largest electricity consumer, China has launched two rounds of power market reforms in 2002 and 2015 to address the trilemma challenges in the electricity sector. However, significant regional disparities in reform progress persist. This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the performance of 26 provincial electricity markets under the State Grid across three key dimensions: energy affordability, supply security, and environmental sustainability. The findings indicate that electricity market reforms have advanced across all provinces, with relatively small variations in progress observed at the provincial level. However, achieving a balance among multiple objectives remains a challenge. Composite scores range from 86.5 to 93.4, with 88 % of provinces scoring above 90 in supply security, but greater variation is observed in environmental sustainability (scores ranging from 82.4 to 92.9). Notably, while spot markets have contributed to enhancing efficiency, they could potentially undermine supply security, and some power-exporting provinces are unexpectedly facing certain supply security risks. This study provides important policy insights into how electricity market reform can better align with China's energy transition strategy, ensuring coordinated and sustainable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addressing the energy trilemma: Progress and evaluation of electricity market reform in China
With the growing global emphasis on energy transition, achieving the simultaneous goals of accessibility, reliability, and sustainability—commonly referred to as the “energy trilemma”—has become a central challenge in the energy sector. As the world's largest electricity consumer, China has launched two rounds of power market reforms in 2002 and 2015 to address the trilemma challenges in the electricity sector. However, significant regional disparities in reform progress persist. This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the performance of 26 provincial electricity markets under the State Grid across three key dimensions: energy affordability, supply security, and environmental sustainability. The findings indicate that electricity market reforms have advanced across all provinces, with relatively small variations in progress observed at the provincial level. However, achieving a balance among multiple objectives remains a challenge. Composite scores range from 86.5 to 93.4, with 88 % of provinces scoring above 90 in supply security, but greater variation is observed in environmental sustainability (scores ranging from 82.4 to 92.9). Notably, while spot markets have contributed to enhancing efficiency, they could potentially undermine supply security, and some power-exporting provinces are unexpectedly facing certain supply security risks. This study provides important policy insights into how electricity market reform can better align with China's energy transition strategy, ensuring coordinated and sustainable development.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.