Jiaqi Guo , Linlin Lu , Fukang Zha , Ilias Agathangelidis , Yu Yao , Qingting Li , Qian Shen , Zilu Li
{"title":"热健康风险网格尺度评价框架——以京津冀地区为例","authors":"Jiaqi Guo , Linlin Lu , Fukang Zha , Ilias Agathangelidis , Yu Yao , Qingting Li , Qian Shen , Zilu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing frequency of extreme heat events has resulted in severe and widespread global impacts. Comprehensive heat risk assessment is crucial for providing targeted climate information and services to enhance cities’ adaptation and mitigation capacities. However, the spatial resolution of administrative-level heat health risk assessments is inadequate for identifying intra-urban risk variations. This study developed a risk assessment framework for heat-related health risks integrating hazard, exposure, susceptibility, and adaptability factors. Utilizing geospatial data such as downscaled land surface temperature, gridded socioeconomic data and point of interest data, the heat health risks were evaluated comprehensively at a fine-grained 500-meter grid resolution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. The results indicated that high-risk profiles were concentrated in the primary urban areas of Beijing and Tianjin. Analysis of Local Climate Zone (LCZ) classifications revealed distinct heat risk patterns across urban morphologies. Compact high-rise built zones (LCZ 1) showed the highest mean heat hazard index (0.82), while natural-type LCZ B areas exhibited the lowest (0.48). LCZ 1 (0.68) and LCZ 2 (0.67) represented the highest heat risk, followed by LCZ 4 (0.60) and LCZ 5 (0.57). To mitigate heat risks, priority measures for reducing ambient temperature and population density should be implemented in LCZs 1 and 2 regions, while LCZs 3, 4, and 5 should prioritize enhancements to healthcare and transportation infrastructure. These fine-scale risk assessment approaches effectively capture local-scale risk hotspots, providing actionable insights for improving heat governance practices and building more thermally resilient cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51332,"journal":{"name":"Climate Services","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A grid-scale assessment framework for heat health risks: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Guo , Linlin Lu , Fukang Zha , Ilias Agathangelidis , Yu Yao , Qingting Li , Qian Shen , Zilu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing frequency of extreme heat events has resulted in severe and widespread global impacts. Comprehensive heat risk assessment is crucial for providing targeted climate information and services to enhance cities’ adaptation and mitigation capacities. However, the spatial resolution of administrative-level heat health risk assessments is inadequate for identifying intra-urban risk variations. This study developed a risk assessment framework for heat-related health risks integrating hazard, exposure, susceptibility, and adaptability factors. Utilizing geospatial data such as downscaled land surface temperature, gridded socioeconomic data and point of interest data, the heat health risks were evaluated comprehensively at a fine-grained 500-meter grid resolution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. The results indicated that high-risk profiles were concentrated in the primary urban areas of Beijing and Tianjin. Analysis of Local Climate Zone (LCZ) classifications revealed distinct heat risk patterns across urban morphologies. Compact high-rise built zones (LCZ 1) showed the highest mean heat hazard index (0.82), while natural-type LCZ B areas exhibited the lowest (0.48). LCZ 1 (0.68) and LCZ 2 (0.67) represented the highest heat risk, followed by LCZ 4 (0.60) and LCZ 5 (0.57). To mitigate heat risks, priority measures for reducing ambient temperature and population density should be implemented in LCZs 1 and 2 regions, while LCZs 3, 4, and 5 should prioritize enhancements to healthcare and transportation infrastructure. These fine-scale risk assessment approaches effectively capture local-scale risk hotspots, providing actionable insights for improving heat governance practices and building more thermally resilient cities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Services\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880725000640\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880725000640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A grid-scale assessment framework for heat health risks: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China
The increasing frequency of extreme heat events has resulted in severe and widespread global impacts. Comprehensive heat risk assessment is crucial for providing targeted climate information and services to enhance cities’ adaptation and mitigation capacities. However, the spatial resolution of administrative-level heat health risk assessments is inadequate for identifying intra-urban risk variations. This study developed a risk assessment framework for heat-related health risks integrating hazard, exposure, susceptibility, and adaptability factors. Utilizing geospatial data such as downscaled land surface temperature, gridded socioeconomic data and point of interest data, the heat health risks were evaluated comprehensively at a fine-grained 500-meter grid resolution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. The results indicated that high-risk profiles were concentrated in the primary urban areas of Beijing and Tianjin. Analysis of Local Climate Zone (LCZ) classifications revealed distinct heat risk patterns across urban morphologies. Compact high-rise built zones (LCZ 1) showed the highest mean heat hazard index (0.82), while natural-type LCZ B areas exhibited the lowest (0.48). LCZ 1 (0.68) and LCZ 2 (0.67) represented the highest heat risk, followed by LCZ 4 (0.60) and LCZ 5 (0.57). To mitigate heat risks, priority measures for reducing ambient temperature and population density should be implemented in LCZs 1 and 2 regions, while LCZs 3, 4, and 5 should prioritize enhancements to healthcare and transportation infrastructure. These fine-scale risk assessment approaches effectively capture local-scale risk hotspots, providing actionable insights for improving heat governance practices and building more thermally resilient cities.
期刊介绍:
The journal Climate Services publishes research with a focus on science-based and user-specific climate information underpinning climate services, ultimately to assist society to adapt to climate change. Climate Services brings science and practice closer together. The journal addresses both researchers in the field of climate service research, and stakeholders and practitioners interested in or already applying climate services. It serves as a means of communication, dialogue and exchange between researchers and stakeholders. Climate services pioneers novel research areas that directly refer to how climate information can be applied in methodologies and tools for adaptation to climate change. It publishes best practice examples, case studies as well as theories, methods and data analysis with a clear connection to climate services. The focus of the published work is often multi-disciplinary, case-specific, tailored to specific sectors and strongly application-oriented. To offer a suitable outlet for such studies, Climate Services journal introduced a new section in the research article type. The research article contains a classical scientific part as well as a section with easily understandable practical implications for policy makers and practitioners. The journal''s focus is on the use and usability of climate information for adaptation purposes underpinning climate services.