南非的金融发展、绿色创新、绿色税收、工业化和环境绩效:制度的中介作用

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kafilah Lola Gold, Fiona Tregenna
{"title":"南非的金融发展、绿色创新、绿色税收、工业化和环境绩效:制度的中介作用","authors":"Kafilah Lola Gold,&nbsp;Fiona Tregenna","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>South Africa is transitioning from a coal-dependent economy toward a green energy pathway in alignment with its National Development Plan 2030 and global commitments to environmental sustainability. Despite notable efforts to reduce carbon emissions, South Africa remains among the top 15 % of largest emitters in the world, with coal accounting for 82.6 % of its energy mix and oil a further 16.6% (DBSA, 2024; Statista, 2024). The effectiveness of carbon tax (polluter-pays-principle) policies and financial mechanisms in promoting environmental sustainability remains contested, primarily due to weak institutional frameworks and regulatory challenges (Montmasson-Clair and Chigumira, 2020). Moreover, while green innovation holds significant potential for improving environmental outcomes, its adoption remains sluggish, hindered by limited financial development and policy inefficiencies. In response to these challenges, this research investigates the nexus between financial development, green innovation and green taxation in South Africa, with a specific focus on the mediating role of institutions. Employing annual data from 1990 to 2022 and applying the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) for robustness, the Granger causality test and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques, the study offers new empirical insights into these dynamics. The findings reveal that financial development and green innovation significantly enhance environmental outcomes, while green tax policies effectively incentivise eco-friendly practices and reduce carbon emissions. Importantly, the robust institutional frameworks are critical in reinforcing these effects by fostering transparency, accountability and policy effectiveness. Based on these results, the study recommends strengthening institutional capacities, expanding green tax frameworks, promoting financial inclusion to support green financing, and encouraging public-private partnerships to accelerate green innovation. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable development by proposing actionable strategies to achieve a low-carbon future in South Africa, with broader applications for other emerging economies undergoing similar transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"393 ","pages":"Article 126942"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial development, green innovation, green tax, industrialisation, and environmental performance in South Africa: The mediating role of institutions\",\"authors\":\"Kafilah Lola Gold,&nbsp;Fiona Tregenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>South Africa is transitioning from a coal-dependent economy toward a green energy pathway in alignment with its National Development Plan 2030 and global commitments to environmental sustainability. Despite notable efforts to reduce carbon emissions, South Africa remains among the top 15 % of largest emitters in the world, with coal accounting for 82.6 % of its energy mix and oil a further 16.6% (DBSA, 2024; Statista, 2024). The effectiveness of carbon tax (polluter-pays-principle) policies and financial mechanisms in promoting environmental sustainability remains contested, primarily due to weak institutional frameworks and regulatory challenges (Montmasson-Clair and Chigumira, 2020). Moreover, while green innovation holds significant potential for improving environmental outcomes, its adoption remains sluggish, hindered by limited financial development and policy inefficiencies. In response to these challenges, this research investigates the nexus between financial development, green innovation and green taxation in South Africa, with a specific focus on the mediating role of institutions. Employing annual data from 1990 to 2022 and applying the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) for robustness, the Granger causality test and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques, the study offers new empirical insights into these dynamics. The findings reveal that financial development and green innovation significantly enhance environmental outcomes, while green tax policies effectively incentivise eco-friendly practices and reduce carbon emissions. Importantly, the robust institutional frameworks are critical in reinforcing these effects by fostering transparency, accountability and policy effectiveness. Based on these results, the study recommends strengthening institutional capacities, expanding green tax frameworks, promoting financial inclusion to support green financing, and encouraging public-private partnerships to accelerate green innovation. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable development by proposing actionable strategies to achieve a low-carbon future in South Africa, with broader applications for other emerging economies undergoing similar transitions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"393 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725029184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725029184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据南非2030年国家发展计划和全球对环境可持续性的承诺,南非正在从依赖煤炭的经济向绿色能源转型。尽管在减少碳排放方面做出了显著努力,但南非仍然是世界上最大的15%的排放国之一,煤炭占其能源结构的82.6%,石油占16.6% (DBSA, 2024;Statista, 2024)。碳税(污染者付费原则)政策和金融机制在促进环境可持续性方面的有效性仍然存在争议,主要是由于制度框架薄弱和监管挑战(montmasson - claire和Chigumira, 2020)。此外,尽管绿色创新在改善环境结果方面具有巨大潜力,但由于金融发展有限和政策效率低下,绿色创新的采用仍然缓慢。为了应对这些挑战,本研究调查了南非金融发展、绿色创新和绿色税收之间的关系,特别关注机构的中介作用。利用1990 - 2022年的年度数据,运用自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型、完全修正的普通最小二乘(FMOLS)稳健性、格兰杰因果检验和两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)技术,对这些动态提供了新的实证见解。研究结果表明,金融发展和绿色创新显著提高了环境结果,而绿色税收政策有效地激励了环保行为并减少了碳排放。重要的是,健全的体制框架对于通过促进透明度、问责制和政策有效性来加强这些影响至关重要。根据这些结果,研究建议加强机构能力,扩大绿色税收框架,促进普惠金融以支持绿色融资,鼓励公私伙伴关系以加速绿色创新。本研究通过提出在南非实现低碳未来的可行战略,为可持续发展的文献体系做出了贡献,并为其他正在经历类似转型的新兴经济体提供了更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial development, green innovation, green tax, industrialisation, and environmental performance in South Africa: The mediating role of institutions
South Africa is transitioning from a coal-dependent economy toward a green energy pathway in alignment with its National Development Plan 2030 and global commitments to environmental sustainability. Despite notable efforts to reduce carbon emissions, South Africa remains among the top 15 % of largest emitters in the world, with coal accounting for 82.6 % of its energy mix and oil a further 16.6% (DBSA, 2024; Statista, 2024). The effectiveness of carbon tax (polluter-pays-principle) policies and financial mechanisms in promoting environmental sustainability remains contested, primarily due to weak institutional frameworks and regulatory challenges (Montmasson-Clair and Chigumira, 2020). Moreover, while green innovation holds significant potential for improving environmental outcomes, its adoption remains sluggish, hindered by limited financial development and policy inefficiencies. In response to these challenges, this research investigates the nexus between financial development, green innovation and green taxation in South Africa, with a specific focus on the mediating role of institutions. Employing annual data from 1990 to 2022 and applying the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model, the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) for robustness, the Granger causality test and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques, the study offers new empirical insights into these dynamics. The findings reveal that financial development and green innovation significantly enhance environmental outcomes, while green tax policies effectively incentivise eco-friendly practices and reduce carbon emissions. Importantly, the robust institutional frameworks are critical in reinforcing these effects by fostering transparency, accountability and policy effectiveness. Based on these results, the study recommends strengthening institutional capacities, expanding green tax frameworks, promoting financial inclusion to support green financing, and encouraging public-private partnerships to accelerate green innovation. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable development by proposing actionable strategies to achieve a low-carbon future in South Africa, with broader applications for other emerging economies undergoing similar transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信