Piotr Foltynski , Karolina Kruszewska , Arkadiusz Krakowiecki , Bozena Czarkowska-Paczek , Piotr Ladyzynski
{"title":"伤口感染识别的人工智能模型及其与人类结果的比较","authors":"Piotr Foltynski , Karolina Kruszewska , Arkadiusz Krakowiecki , Bozena Czarkowska-Paczek , Piotr Ladyzynski","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recognizing an infected wound based solely on a photograph can be a challenge and the aim of this work was to develop a machine learning model that would enable that. We selected 899 wound photographs taken at PODOS Wound Care Clinic (Warsaw, Poland). There were 445 photographs showing uninfected wounds, whereas 454 photographs showed infected wounds with positive microbiological test and antibiotic treatment. A test set was created by randomly selecting 82 photographs representing 42 uninfected and 40 infected wounds. From the remaining photographs, 154 were randomly selected for the validation set, and the remaining 663 formed the training set. Initially we used five pretrained YOLO models from generation 8 and five from generation 11. The 8th generation models performed better than 11th generation models and were then compared with the results of 6 experts and 6 nursing students. The post-hoc analysis revealed that AI models outperformed both specialists and students in terms of mean averaged precision (mAP), accuracy and F1 score, while the results of specialists and students did not differ significantly. For specialists, the medians of mAP, F1 score, and accuracy were 74.1 %, 76.4 %, and 74.4 %, respectively. For Students the medians were 68.4 %, 59.4 %, and 67.7 %, respectively; and for AI models the medians were 92.7 %, 92.9 %, and 92.7 %, respectively. The highest accuracy of 95.1 % of YOLOv8n model was significantly higher than the best specialist’s result of 84.1 %. These results suggest that artificial intelligence can significantly help caregivers recognize wound infection, so they can take appropriate action more quickly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 572-579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence models for wound infection recognition and their comparison with human results\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Foltynski , Karolina Kruszewska , Arkadiusz Krakowiecki , Bozena Czarkowska-Paczek , Piotr Ladyzynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbe.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recognizing an infected wound based solely on a photograph can be a challenge and the aim of this work was to develop a machine learning model that would enable that. We selected 899 wound photographs taken at PODOS Wound Care Clinic (Warsaw, Poland). There were 445 photographs showing uninfected wounds, whereas 454 photographs showed infected wounds with positive microbiological test and antibiotic treatment. A test set was created by randomly selecting 82 photographs representing 42 uninfected and 40 infected wounds. From the remaining photographs, 154 were randomly selected for the validation set, and the remaining 663 formed the training set. Initially we used five pretrained YOLO models from generation 8 and five from generation 11. The 8th generation models performed better than 11th generation models and were then compared with the results of 6 experts and 6 nursing students. The post-hoc analysis revealed that AI models outperformed both specialists and students in terms of mean averaged precision (mAP), accuracy and F1 score, while the results of specialists and students did not differ significantly. For specialists, the medians of mAP, F1 score, and accuracy were 74.1 %, 76.4 %, and 74.4 %, respectively. For Students the medians were 68.4 %, 59.4 %, and 67.7 %, respectively; and for AI models the medians were 92.7 %, 92.9 %, and 92.7 %, respectively. The highest accuracy of 95.1 % of YOLOv8n model was significantly higher than the best specialist’s result of 84.1 %. These results suggest that artificial intelligence can significantly help caregivers recognize wound infection, so they can take appropriate action more quickly.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 572-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521625000610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521625000610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence models for wound infection recognition and their comparison with human results
Recognizing an infected wound based solely on a photograph can be a challenge and the aim of this work was to develop a machine learning model that would enable that. We selected 899 wound photographs taken at PODOS Wound Care Clinic (Warsaw, Poland). There were 445 photographs showing uninfected wounds, whereas 454 photographs showed infected wounds with positive microbiological test and antibiotic treatment. A test set was created by randomly selecting 82 photographs representing 42 uninfected and 40 infected wounds. From the remaining photographs, 154 were randomly selected for the validation set, and the remaining 663 formed the training set. Initially we used five pretrained YOLO models from generation 8 and five from generation 11. The 8th generation models performed better than 11th generation models and were then compared with the results of 6 experts and 6 nursing students. The post-hoc analysis revealed that AI models outperformed both specialists and students in terms of mean averaged precision (mAP), accuracy and F1 score, while the results of specialists and students did not differ significantly. For specialists, the medians of mAP, F1 score, and accuracy were 74.1 %, 76.4 %, and 74.4 %, respectively. For Students the medians were 68.4 %, 59.4 %, and 67.7 %, respectively; and for AI models the medians were 92.7 %, 92.9 %, and 92.7 %, respectively. The highest accuracy of 95.1 % of YOLOv8n model was significantly higher than the best specialist’s result of 84.1 %. These results suggest that artificial intelligence can significantly help caregivers recognize wound infection, so they can take appropriate action more quickly.
期刊介绍:
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.