女性压力性尿失禁手术后膀胱出口梗阻的处理:一项北美外科医生调查的结果

IF 1.2
Andry Perrin , Lysanne Campeau , Jas Singh , Jacques Corcos
{"title":"女性压力性尿失禁手术后膀胱出口梗阻的处理:一项北美外科医生调查的结果","authors":"Andry Perrin ,&nbsp;Lysanne Campeau ,&nbsp;Jas Singh ,&nbsp;Jacques Corcos","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2025.102277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To gather expert opinion and describe trends in the management of early and prolonged bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Expert physicians and members of the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine &amp; Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU), were queried by means of an online survey regarding the management of bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty surgeons answered the questionnaire (9 %). Most responders performed &gt;20 sling procedures per year, and 15 % of them were autologous fascial pubovaginal slings. The estimated prevalence of complete postoperative urinary retention was 3 %. The prevalence of post-void residual volume ≥200 ml, was estimated around 8 %. Of those presenting with post-void residual ≥200 ml, 35 % were symptomatic. For a inability to void 48 h after synthetic mid-urethral sling insertion, most responders would observe for a week before planning an incision of the sling. In the case of post-void residual ≥200 ml, the trend of the majority would be observation. In patient in inability to void 48 h following autologous fascial pubovaginal sling procedure, most participants would offer observation, as well as if the patient presented with post-void residual ≥200 ml.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>According to expert opinion, although we could highlight some trends in the management of bladder outlet obstruction associated with urinary retention following the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence, particularly with regards to observation, there was no consensus on the management in terms of method or timing of surgical revision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 102277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of bladder outlet obstruction after stress urinary incontinence surgery in women: Results of a North American Survey among surgeons\",\"authors\":\"Andry Perrin ,&nbsp;Lysanne Campeau ,&nbsp;Jas Singh ,&nbsp;Jacques Corcos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cont.2025.102277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To gather expert opinion and describe trends in the management of early and prolonged bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Expert physicians and members of the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine &amp; Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU), were queried by means of an online survey regarding the management of bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty surgeons answered the questionnaire (9 %). Most responders performed &gt;20 sling procedures per year, and 15 % of them were autologous fascial pubovaginal slings. The estimated prevalence of complete postoperative urinary retention was 3 %. The prevalence of post-void residual volume ≥200 ml, was estimated around 8 %. Of those presenting with post-void residual ≥200 ml, 35 % were symptomatic. For a inability to void 48 h after synthetic mid-urethral sling insertion, most responders would observe for a week before planning an incision of the sling. In the case of post-void residual ≥200 ml, the trend of the majority would be observation. In patient in inability to void 48 h following autologous fascial pubovaginal sling procedure, most participants would offer observation, as well as if the patient presented with post-void residual ≥200 ml.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>According to expert opinion, although we could highlight some trends in the management of bladder outlet obstruction associated with urinary retention following the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence, particularly with regards to observation, there was no consensus on the management in terms of method or timing of surgical revision.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973725005363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973725005363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:收集专家意见,描述压力性尿失禁手术后早期和长期膀胱出口梗阻的处理趋势。方法专家医师及泌尿动力学学会、女性盆腔医学学会会员;通过一项关于压力性尿失禁手术后膀胱出口梗阻处理的在线调查,对泌尿生殖器官重建(SUFU)的患者进行了询问。结果60名外科医生回答问卷,占9%。大多数应答者每年进行20次吊带手术,其中15%是自体耻骨阴道筋膜吊带。估计术后尿潴留发生率为3%。空隙后残余容积≥200ml的发生率估计约为8%。在空洞后残留≥200ml的患者中,35%出现症状。对于人工尿道中吊带插入48小时后无法排空,大多数应答者会观察一周后再计划切开吊带。当空后残留≥200 ml时,观察大多数人的趋势。对于自体耻骨阴道筋膜悬吊术后48小时无法排尿的患者,大多数参与者会提供观察,以及如果患者出现排尿后残留≥200ml。结论根据专家意见,尽管我们可以强调一些趋势,在处理女性压力性尿失禁手术后,膀胱出口梗阻与尿潴留,特别是在观察方面。在手术修复的方法和时机方面没有达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of bladder outlet obstruction after stress urinary incontinence surgery in women: Results of a North American Survey among surgeons

Introduction

To gather expert opinion and describe trends in the management of early and prolonged bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Methods

Expert physicians and members of the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU), were queried by means of an online survey regarding the management of bladder outlet obstruction following stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Results

Sixty surgeons answered the questionnaire (9 %). Most responders performed >20 sling procedures per year, and 15 % of them were autologous fascial pubovaginal slings. The estimated prevalence of complete postoperative urinary retention was 3 %. The prevalence of post-void residual volume ≥200 ml, was estimated around 8 %. Of those presenting with post-void residual ≥200 ml, 35 % were symptomatic. For a inability to void 48 h after synthetic mid-urethral sling insertion, most responders would observe for a week before planning an incision of the sling. In the case of post-void residual ≥200 ml, the trend of the majority would be observation. In patient in inability to void 48 h following autologous fascial pubovaginal sling procedure, most participants would offer observation, as well as if the patient presented with post-void residual ≥200 ml.

Conclusions

According to expert opinion, although we could highlight some trends in the management of bladder outlet obstruction associated with urinary retention following the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence, particularly with regards to observation, there was no consensus on the management in terms of method or timing of surgical revision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信