Yisong Zhu , Ziqi Yang , Xi Feng , Cheng Cheng , Yuntao Guo , Qiumeng Li , Tianhao Wu , Xinghua Li , Frank Witlox
{"title":"比较建筑环境对共享单车和电动共享单车使用的影响:一种时空机器学习方法","authors":"Yisong Zhu , Ziqi Yang , Xi Feng , Cheng Cheng , Yuntao Guo , Qiumeng Li , Tianhao Wu , Xinghua Li , Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104642"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing built environment effects on bike-sharing and electric bike-sharing usage: a spatiotemporal machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Yisong Zhu , Ziqi Yang , Xi Feng , Cheng Cheng , Yuntao Guo , Qiumeng Li , Tianhao Wu , Xinghua Li , Frank Witlox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002708\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing built environment effects on bike-sharing and electric bike-sharing usage: a spatiotemporal machine learning approach
Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.