比较建筑环境对共享单车和电动共享单车使用的影响:一种时空机器学习方法

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yisong Zhu , Ziqi Yang , Xi Feng , Cheng Cheng , Yuntao Guo , Qiumeng Li , Tianhao Wu , Xinghua Li , Frank Witlox
{"title":"比较建筑环境对共享单车和电动共享单车使用的影响:一种时空机器学习方法","authors":"Yisong Zhu ,&nbsp;Ziqi Yang ,&nbsp;Xi Feng ,&nbsp;Cheng Cheng ,&nbsp;Yuntao Guo ,&nbsp;Qiumeng Li ,&nbsp;Tianhao Wu ,&nbsp;Xinghua Li ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104642"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing built environment effects on bike-sharing and electric bike-sharing usage: a spatiotemporal machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Yisong Zhu ,&nbsp;Ziqi Yang ,&nbsp;Xi Feng ,&nbsp;Cheng Cheng ,&nbsp;Yuntao Guo ,&nbsp;Qiumeng Li ,&nbsp;Tianhao Wu ,&nbsp;Xinghua Li ,&nbsp;Frank Witlox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002708\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享微出行已被广泛认为是促进可持续城市交通的一种有前景的解决方案,并迅速发展为多种服务,如共享单车(BS)和电动共享单车(EBS)。然而,现有的研究主要是分别考察了BS和EBS,对它们的旅行模式和决定因素的比较分析明显有限。此外,尽管机器学习方法已经成为建模非线性关系的普遍方法,但这些方法通常忽略了时空异质性,可能导致有偏差的估计和不准确的解释。为了解决这些差距,本研究开发了一个新的建模框架,将XGBoost与地理和时间加权回归(GTWR)结合起来,同时考虑时空异质性和非线性。以合肥市城市交通数据为例,对比分析了公交模式和EBS模式的交通特征,并运用综合建模框架研究了建成环境对两种模式的影响。结果表明:在城市中,BS和EBS均表现出明显的高峰时段使用模式,但在空间上,BS的使用主要集中在市区,而EBS的使用在全市范围内分布较为均匀。在研究的因素中,到地铁站的距离和就业密度是这两种模式最重要的预测因素。此外,非线性关系表明,高支路密度和低主路密度与BS的增加相关,但减少了EBS的使用,而土地利用组合表现出明显的阈值效应,超过阈值后,两种模式的使用均显著增加。这些发现为运营商优化车队部署和政策制定者设计有针对性的干预措施提供了有价值的见解,支持协调和可持续的共享微交通发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing built environment effects on bike-sharing and electric bike-sharing usage: a spatiotemporal machine learning approach
Shared micromobility has been widely recognized as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban transportation, experiencing rapid growth and diversifying into various services, such as bike-sharing (BS) and electric bike-sharing (EBS). However, existing studies have primarily examined BS and EBS separately, leaving comparative analyses of their travel patterns and determinants notably limited. Moreover, although machine learning approaches have become prevalent for modeling nonlinear relationships, these methods typically overlook spatiotemporal heterogeneity, potentially resulting in biased estimations and inaccurate interpretations. To address these gaps, this study develops a novel modeling framework integrating XGBoost with geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR), enabling simultaneous consideration of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and nonlinearity. Using trip data from Hefei, China, we comparatively analyze the travel characteristics of BS and EBS and apply the integrated modeling framework to investigate the built environment’s influence on both modes. The results indicate that both BS and EBS exhibit distinct peak-hour usage patterns, while spatially, BS usage is concentrated in downtown areas and EBS usage is more evenly distributed citywide. Among examined factors, distance to metro stations and employment density emerge as the most significant predictors for both modes. Additionally, nonlinear relationships reveal that higher branch road density and lower major road density are associated with increased BS but reduced EBS usage, while land use mix demonstrates clear threshold effects, beyond which usage of both modes significantly increases. These findings provide valuable insights for operators to optimize fleet deployment and for policymakers to design targeted interventions supporting coordinated and sustainable shared micromobility development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信