以前未在玛雅壁画中发现的植物和动物分子:阿坎切的第一批结果

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Jorge Martínez Sales , Gloria Ivonne Hernández-Bolio , Emanuel Hernández Núñez , Claudia Ocampo Flores , Patricia Quintana Owen , Maria Luisa Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual , Cristina Vidal Lorenzo
{"title":"以前未在玛雅壁画中发现的植物和动物分子:阿坎切的第一批结果","authors":"Jorge Martínez Sales ,&nbsp;Gloria Ivonne Hernández-Bolio ,&nbsp;Emanuel Hernández Núñez ,&nbsp;Claudia Ocampo Flores ,&nbsp;Patricia Quintana Owen ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual ,&nbsp;Cristina Vidal Lorenzo","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The debate regarding the Maya painting technique has been extensive since its discovery. Initially, due to their similarity to the Pompeian frescoes, these paintings were mistakenly referred to as “Maya fresco wall paintings”. However, archaeometry studies applied to the knowledge of pre-Hispanic Maya murals have frequently detected organic binders, which indicates that Maya painters mainly applied dry techniques in their development. But what organic binders did these artists use for this purpose? After many decades of optimizing physicochemical protocols to detect them, the results are only conclusive for a few plant-based binders. Previous analytical methods applied for other authors (<span><span>Magaloni, 1998a, 2001</span></span>; <span><span>Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual, 2006; Guasch-Ferré, 2016; Guasch-Ferré et al., 2019</span></span>) have ranged from stratigraphic observation using optical microscopy to more advanced techniques focusing mainly on plant-derived sugars. This article describes the results obtained by applying a methodology for the extraction of medium polarity organic components using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) to Maya mural paintings. This methodology has identified new molecules suggesting plant and animal origin in mural paintings remains from Acanceh, dating from the Late Classis Period (ca. 600–900). These results not only provide new evidence on pictorial binders, but also invite replication of this study on other murals from the Maya area to expand our knowledge of painting technique of these works, which are of great interest to archaeology, art history, conservation and restoration sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 105348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant and animal molecules non previously identified in Maya mural paintings: First results from Acanceh\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Martínez Sales ,&nbsp;Gloria Ivonne Hernández-Bolio ,&nbsp;Emanuel Hernández Núñez ,&nbsp;Claudia Ocampo Flores ,&nbsp;Patricia Quintana Owen ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual ,&nbsp;Cristina Vidal Lorenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The debate regarding the Maya painting technique has been extensive since its discovery. Initially, due to their similarity to the Pompeian frescoes, these paintings were mistakenly referred to as “Maya fresco wall paintings”. However, archaeometry studies applied to the knowledge of pre-Hispanic Maya murals have frequently detected organic binders, which indicates that Maya painters mainly applied dry techniques in their development. But what organic binders did these artists use for this purpose? After many decades of optimizing physicochemical protocols to detect them, the results are only conclusive for a few plant-based binders. Previous analytical methods applied for other authors (<span><span>Magaloni, 1998a, 2001</span></span>; <span><span>Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual, 2006; Guasch-Ferré, 2016; Guasch-Ferré et al., 2019</span></span>) have ranged from stratigraphic observation using optical microscopy to more advanced techniques focusing mainly on plant-derived sugars. This article describes the results obtained by applying a methodology for the extraction of medium polarity organic components using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) to Maya mural paintings. This methodology has identified new molecules suggesting plant and animal origin in mural paintings remains from Acanceh, dating from the Late Classis Period (ca. 600–900). These results not only provide new evidence on pictorial binders, but also invite replication of this study on other murals from the Maya area to expand our knowledge of painting technique of these works, which are of great interest to archaeology, art history, conservation and restoration sciences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25003815\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25003815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从玛雅绘画技术被发现以来,关于它的争论一直很广泛。最初,由于它们与庞培壁画相似,这些壁画被错误地称为“玛雅壁画”。然而,应用于前西班牙玛雅壁画知识的考古测量学研究经常发现有机粘合剂,这表明玛雅画家在他们的发展中主要使用干燥技术。但是这些艺术家使用了什么有机粘合剂来达到这个目的呢?经过几十年的优化物理化学方案来检测它们,结果仅对少数植物基粘合剂具有结论性。以前的分析方法适用于其他作者(Magaloni, 1998a, 2001;Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual, 2006;Guasch-Ferre, 2016;guasch - ferr等人,2019)的研究范围从使用光学显微镜进行地层观察到主要关注植物衍生糖的更先进技术。本文描述了采用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)提取玛雅壁画中中极性有机成分的方法所获得的结果。这种方法已经确定了新的分子,表明在阿坎切的壁画遗骸中有植物和动物的起源,可以追溯到古典晚期(约600-900年)。这些结果不仅提供了关于绘画粘合剂的新证据,而且还邀请在玛雅地区的其他壁画上复制该研究,以扩大我们对这些作品的绘画技术的了解,这些作品对考古学,艺术史,保护和修复科学具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Plant and animal molecules non previously identified in Maya mural paintings: First results from Acanceh

Plant and animal molecules non previously identified in Maya mural paintings: First results from Acanceh
The debate regarding the Maya painting technique has been extensive since its discovery. Initially, due to their similarity to the Pompeian frescoes, these paintings were mistakenly referred to as “Maya fresco wall paintings”. However, archaeometry studies applied to the knowledge of pre-Hispanic Maya murals have frequently detected organic binders, which indicates that Maya painters mainly applied dry techniques in their development. But what organic binders did these artists use for this purpose? After many decades of optimizing physicochemical protocols to detect them, the results are only conclusive for a few plant-based binders. Previous analytical methods applied for other authors (Magaloni, 1998a, 2001; Vázquez de Ágredos Pascual, 2006; Guasch-Ferré, 2016; Guasch-Ferré et al., 2019) have ranged from stratigraphic observation using optical microscopy to more advanced techniques focusing mainly on plant-derived sugars. This article describes the results obtained by applying a methodology for the extraction of medium polarity organic components using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) to Maya mural paintings. This methodology has identified new molecules suggesting plant and animal origin in mural paintings remains from Acanceh, dating from the Late Classis Period (ca. 600–900). These results not only provide new evidence on pictorial binders, but also invite replication of this study on other murals from the Maya area to expand our knowledge of painting technique of these works, which are of great interest to archaeology, art history, conservation and restoration sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信