用分形染色质模式区分反应性淋巴细胞和母细胞。

Abigail Gordhamer, Henry Tullis, Ryan Cordner
{"title":"用分形染色质模式区分反应性淋巴细胞和母细胞。","authors":"Abigail Gordhamer, Henry Tullis, Ryan Cordner","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Of all the cells identified in peripheral blood smears, reactive lymphocytes (RLs) and blasts are considered especially difficult to differentiate. Blasts and RLs are present in distinct diseases that carry unique prognoses and treatments; however, there are currently no definitive methods to distinguish these cells morphologically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a method to distinguish between blasts and RLs based on the quantification of fractal chromatin patterns. Nuclei from white blood cell images were isolated, and the fractal patterns were quantified using The Workflow of Matrix Biology Informatics (TWOMBLI) software. Quantified fractals were compared using the t-test. The data was further split into training and testing sets. Models (random forest and k-nearest neighbors) were selected through cross-validation on the training sets. Performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity, were determined for the selected models on the testing sets. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our most general model was able to identify RLs and blast subtypes with an average 84.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.844. Testing on the holdout set gave every model an area under the curve greater than 0.815. PCA revealed two components that account for 50% of the data's variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that a classification algorithm can effectively distinguish between blasts and RLs based solely on fractal chromatin patterns. It is possible that a similar algorithm could be utilized in the clinical hematology laboratory to assist in distinguishing RLs and blasts in peripheral blood smears.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing Reactive Lymphocytes From Blasts Using Fractal Chromatin Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Gordhamer, Henry Tullis, Ryan Cordner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Of all the cells identified in peripheral blood smears, reactive lymphocytes (RLs) and blasts are considered especially difficult to differentiate. Blasts and RLs are present in distinct diseases that carry unique prognoses and treatments; however, there are currently no definitive methods to distinguish these cells morphologically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a method to distinguish between blasts and RLs based on the quantification of fractal chromatin patterns. Nuclei from white blood cell images were isolated, and the fractal patterns were quantified using The Workflow of Matrix Biology Informatics (TWOMBLI) software. Quantified fractals were compared using the t-test. The data was further split into training and testing sets. Models (random forest and k-nearest neighbors) were selected through cross-validation on the training sets. Performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity, were determined for the selected models on the testing sets. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our most general model was able to identify RLs and blast subtypes with an average 84.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.844. Testing on the holdout set gave every model an area under the curve greater than 0.815. PCA revealed two components that account for 50% of the data's variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that a classification algorithm can effectively distinguish between blasts and RLs based solely on fractal chromatin patterns. It is possible that a similar algorithm could be utilized in the clinical hematology laboratory to assist in distinguishing RLs and blasts in peripheral blood smears.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of laboratory hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of laboratory hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在外周血涂片中发现的所有细胞中,反应性淋巴细胞(RLs)和母细胞被认为是特别难以区分的。原细胞和RLs存在于具有独特预后和治疗方法的不同疾病中;然而,目前还没有明确的方法来区分这些细胞的形态。方法:建立了一种基于分形染色质模式定量区分胚和RLs的方法。从白细胞图像中分离出细胞核,并使用the Workflow of Matrix Biology Informatics (TWOMBLI)软件对其分形模式进行量化。量化分形采用t检验进行比较。数据进一步分为训练集和测试集。通过对训练集的交叉验证选择模型(随机森林和k近邻)。性能指标,包括曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、精密度、特异性和灵敏度,被选定的模型在测试集上确定。并进行主成分分析(PCA)。结果:我们最通用的模型能够识别RLs和blast亚型,平均准确率为84.2%,AUC为0.844。对holdout集合的测试使每个模型的曲线下面积大于0.815。PCA揭示了占数据方差50%的两个成分。结论:基于分形染色质模式的分类算法可以有效区分胚和RLs。有可能在临床血液学实验室中使用类似的算法来帮助区分外周血涂片中的RLs和blast。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing Reactive Lymphocytes From Blasts Using Fractal Chromatin Patterns.

Introduction: Of all the cells identified in peripheral blood smears, reactive lymphocytes (RLs) and blasts are considered especially difficult to differentiate. Blasts and RLs are present in distinct diseases that carry unique prognoses and treatments; however, there are currently no definitive methods to distinguish these cells morphologically.

Methods: We developed a method to distinguish between blasts and RLs based on the quantification of fractal chromatin patterns. Nuclei from white blood cell images were isolated, and the fractal patterns were quantified using The Workflow of Matrix Biology Informatics (TWOMBLI) software. Quantified fractals were compared using the t-test. The data was further split into training and testing sets. Models (random forest and k-nearest neighbors) were selected through cross-validation on the training sets. Performance metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity, were determined for the selected models on the testing sets. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed.

Results: Our most general model was able to identify RLs and blast subtypes with an average 84.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.844. Testing on the holdout set gave every model an area under the curve greater than 0.815. PCA revealed two components that account for 50% of the data's variance.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that a classification algorithm can effectively distinguish between blasts and RLs based solely on fractal chromatin patterns. It is possible that a similar algorithm could be utilized in the clinical hematology laboratory to assist in distinguishing RLs and blasts in peripheral blood smears.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信