Jeremy Dixon, Harry Bark, Chao Fang, Judy Laing, Demi Patsios
{"title":"使用精神能力和精神卫生法在照顾痴呆症患者在住宅和医院设置:文献的系统回顾。","authors":"Jeremy Dixon, Harry Bark, Chao Fang, Judy Laing, Demi Patsios","doi":"10.1177/14713012251367810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) has implications for the use of law with people living with dementia. This systematic review identifies how decisions to deprive people living with dementia of their liberty, using domestic mental capacity and mental health laws, are understood and made by professionals, and are experienced by people living with dementia and their carers. Database searches of Scopus, IBSS, CINAHL, PubMed, HMIC, and Social Policy and Practice were conducted to identify relevant academic and grey literature, with final searches in July 2024. No geographical or time scale restrictions were applied. Studies not written in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and thematic synthesis was used to organise data. The study was funded by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (grant number SP1200) and is registered on Prospero (CRD42023483046). Eleven studies were selected for review. Six papers were qualitative, three were quantitative and two employed mixed methods. Eight studies were based within the UK and all studies were conducted in Europe. Key themes were (1). Levels of legal understanding amongst stakeholder groups. (2). The influence of professional background on decision-making in dementia detention cases. (3). The impact of the severity of dementia and dementia diagnosis on decision-making. (4). The impact of care setting on decision-making. (5). The experiences of carers during decision-making. (6). The exclusion of people living with dementia during decision-making. Limitations are that not enough studies were identified to provide a meta-synthesis, non-English texts were excluded and that we did not specifically search for articles relating to guardianship laws. Our study identified significant gaps between the ideals of the UNCRPD and practice in health and social care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251367810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Mental Capacity and Mental Health Laws in the Care of People Living With Dementia in Residential and Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Dixon, Harry Bark, Chao Fang, Judy Laing, Demi Patsios\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012251367810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) has implications for the use of law with people living with dementia. This systematic review identifies how decisions to deprive people living with dementia of their liberty, using domestic mental capacity and mental health laws, are understood and made by professionals, and are experienced by people living with dementia and their carers. Database searches of Scopus, IBSS, CINAHL, PubMed, HMIC, and Social Policy and Practice were conducted to identify relevant academic and grey literature, with final searches in July 2024. No geographical or time scale restrictions were applied. Studies not written in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and thematic synthesis was used to organise data. The study was funded by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (grant number SP1200) and is registered on Prospero (CRD42023483046). Eleven studies were selected for review. Six papers were qualitative, three were quantitative and two employed mixed methods. Eight studies were based within the UK and all studies were conducted in Europe. Key themes were (1). Levels of legal understanding amongst stakeholder groups. (2). The influence of professional background on decision-making in dementia detention cases. (3). The impact of the severity of dementia and dementia diagnosis on decision-making. (4). The impact of care setting on decision-making. (5). The experiences of carers during decision-making. (6). The exclusion of people living with dementia during decision-making. Limitations are that not enough studies were identified to provide a meta-synthesis, non-English texts were excluded and that we did not specifically search for articles relating to guardianship laws. Our study identified significant gaps between the ideals of the UNCRPD and practice in health and social care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14713012251367810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251367810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251367810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《联合国残疾人权利公约》(UNCRPD)对对痴呆症患者使用法律具有影响。本系统综述确定了专业人员如何理解和作出利用国内精神能力和精神卫生法剥夺痴呆症患者自由的决定,以及痴呆症患者及其照护者如何经历这些决定。检索Scopus、IBSS、CINAHL、PubMed、HMIC、Social Policy and Practice等数据库,确定相关学术文献和灰色文献,最终检索时间为2024年7月。没有地域或时间限制。非英文研究被排除在外。使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量,并使用主题综合来组织数据。该研究由雅芳和威尔特郡心理健康伙伴关系(资助号SP1200)资助,并在Prospero上注册(CRD42023483046)。我们选择了11项研究进行综述。6篇是定性的,3篇是定量的,2篇是混合的。8项研究在英国进行,所有研究都在欧洲进行。关键主题是(1)。利益相关者群体之间的法律理解水平。(2). 专业背景对痴呆拘留案件决策的影响。(3)。痴呆严重程度和痴呆诊断对决策的影响。(4)。护理环境对决策的影响。(5)。护理人员在决策过程中的经验。(6)。在决策过程中将痴呆症患者排除在外。限制是没有足够的研究被确定来提供综合,非英语文本被排除在外,我们没有专门搜索与监护法有关的文章。我们的研究发现,《公约》的理想与卫生和社会保健环境中的实践之间存在重大差距。
The Use of Mental Capacity and Mental Health Laws in the Care of People Living With Dementia in Residential and Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) has implications for the use of law with people living with dementia. This systematic review identifies how decisions to deprive people living with dementia of their liberty, using domestic mental capacity and mental health laws, are understood and made by professionals, and are experienced by people living with dementia and their carers. Database searches of Scopus, IBSS, CINAHL, PubMed, HMIC, and Social Policy and Practice were conducted to identify relevant academic and grey literature, with final searches in July 2024. No geographical or time scale restrictions were applied. Studies not written in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and thematic synthesis was used to organise data. The study was funded by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership (grant number SP1200) and is registered on Prospero (CRD42023483046). Eleven studies were selected for review. Six papers were qualitative, three were quantitative and two employed mixed methods. Eight studies were based within the UK and all studies were conducted in Europe. Key themes were (1). Levels of legal understanding amongst stakeholder groups. (2). The influence of professional background on decision-making in dementia detention cases. (3). The impact of the severity of dementia and dementia diagnosis on decision-making. (4). The impact of care setting on decision-making. (5). The experiences of carers during decision-making. (6). The exclusion of people living with dementia during decision-making. Limitations are that not enough studies were identified to provide a meta-synthesis, non-English texts were excluded and that we did not specifically search for articles relating to guardianship laws. Our study identified significant gaps between the ideals of the UNCRPD and practice in health and social care settings.