蜥蜴热生理驱动丰度高峰沿气候梯度,但只能微弱预测分布极限。

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1086/736566
Zachary K Lange, Brooke L Bodensteiner, Daniel J Nicholson, Gavia Lertzman-Lepofsky, Alexander H Murray, Edita Folfas, Saúl Domínguez-Guerrero, D Luke Mahler, Martha M Muñoz, Luke O Frishkoff
{"title":"蜥蜴热生理驱动丰度高峰沿气候梯度,但只能微弱预测分布极限。","authors":"Zachary K Lange, Brooke L Bodensteiner, Daniel J Nicholson, Gavia Lertzman-Lepofsky, Alexander H Murray, Edita Folfas, Saúl Domínguez-Guerrero, D Luke Mahler, Martha M Muñoz, Luke O Frishkoff","doi":"10.1086/736566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractLaboratory measurements of physiological traits have long been used to infer the thermal limits and preferences of species in the field. However, it remains unclear how well individual physiological traits scale up to explain broad distribution patterns of species, such as their climatic limits, the breadth of temperatures they occur in, and the conditions at which population abundances are highest. We address these gaps by combining laboratory-measured thermal traits (critical thermal minimum [CT<sub>min</sub>], critical thermal maximum [CT<sub>max</sub>], and thermal preference [<i>T</i><sub>pref</sub>]) with occurrence and abundance data from 21 species of <i>Anolis</i> lizards collected from extensive mark-resight surveys of communities across the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico and Hispaniola. Our findings suggest that thermal limits do map to distribution boundaries, such that CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> are significant predictors of maximum and minimum environmental temperatures at which species occur in nature, albeit with substantial error. Curiously though, physiological niche breadth (<math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>CT</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>max</mi></mrow></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mrow><mi>CT</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>min</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math>) does not positively correlate with climatic niche breadth. This means that species able to tolerate a wide range of temperatures do not always occur across a broad range of climates, limiting our ability to make clear-cut statements about what constitutes a thermal generalist or specialist. The climatological temperature where population abundance is maximized is the geographic feature best predicted by physiology, yet counterintuitively <i>T</i><sub>pref</sub> performs worse than critical thermal limits at predicting where this abundance peak occurs. Together, our findings suggest that individual physiological responses to temperature do not always translate to distribution patterns in predictable ways, suggesting a substantial role for other factors, such as competition, predation, nonthermal habitat characteristics, and behavioral buffering, in setting range-wide distribution patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"206 3","pages":"E47-E62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lizard Thermal Physiology Drives Abundance Peaks along Climate Gradients but Only Weakly Predicts Distributional Limits.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary K Lange, Brooke L Bodensteiner, Daniel J Nicholson, Gavia Lertzman-Lepofsky, Alexander H Murray, Edita Folfas, Saúl Domínguez-Guerrero, D Luke Mahler, Martha M Muñoz, Luke O Frishkoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/736566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractLaboratory measurements of physiological traits have long been used to infer the thermal limits and preferences of species in the field. However, it remains unclear how well individual physiological traits scale up to explain broad distribution patterns of species, such as their climatic limits, the breadth of temperatures they occur in, and the conditions at which population abundances are highest. We address these gaps by combining laboratory-measured thermal traits (critical thermal minimum [CT<sub>min</sub>], critical thermal maximum [CT<sub>max</sub>], and thermal preference [<i>T</i><sub>pref</sub>]) with occurrence and abundance data from 21 species of <i>Anolis</i> lizards collected from extensive mark-resight surveys of communities across the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico and Hispaniola. Our findings suggest that thermal limits do map to distribution boundaries, such that CT<sub>max</sub> and CT<sub>min</sub> are significant predictors of maximum and minimum environmental temperatures at which species occur in nature, albeit with substantial error. Curiously though, physiological niche breadth (<math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>CT</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>max</mi></mrow></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mrow><mi>CT</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>min</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math>) does not positively correlate with climatic niche breadth. This means that species able to tolerate a wide range of temperatures do not always occur across a broad range of climates, limiting our ability to make clear-cut statements about what constitutes a thermal generalist or specialist. The climatological temperature where population abundance is maximized is the geographic feature best predicted by physiology, yet counterintuitively <i>T</i><sub>pref</sub> performs worse than critical thermal limits at predicting where this abundance peak occurs. Together, our findings suggest that individual physiological responses to temperature do not always translate to distribution patterns in predictable ways, suggesting a substantial role for other factors, such as competition, predation, nonthermal habitat characteristics, and behavioral buffering, in setting range-wide distribution patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"206 3\",\"pages\":\"E47-E62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/736566\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/736566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,实验室测量生理性状一直被用来推断野外物种的热极限和偏好。然而,目前还不清楚个体的生理特征在多大程度上可以解释物种的广泛分布模式,比如它们的气候限制、它们发生的温度范围以及种群丰度最高的条件。我们通过将实验室测量的热特性(临界热最小值[CTmin],临界热最大值[CTmax]和热偏好[Tpref])与从波多黎各和伊斯帕尼奥拉岛加勒比海社区广泛的标记观察调查中收集的21种蜥蜴的发生率和丰度数据相结合来解决这些差距。我们的研究结果表明,热极限确实映射到分布边界,因此CTmax和CTmin是物种在自然界中发生的最高和最低环境温度的重要预测因子,尽管存在很大的误差。然而奇怪的是,生理生态位宽度(CTmax-CTmin)与气候生态位宽度没有正相关。这意味着能够忍受大范围温度的物种并不总是出现在大范围的气候中,这限制了我们对什么是热通才或专家做出明确陈述的能力。种群丰度最大的气候温度是生理学最能预测的地理特征,但与直觉相反,Tpref在预测丰度峰值发生的地方比临界热极限表现得更差。总之,我们的研究结果表明,个体对温度的生理反应并不总是以可预测的方式转化为分布模式,这表明其他因素,如竞争、捕食、非热栖息地特征和行为缓冲,在设定范围内的分布模式中起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lizard Thermal Physiology Drives Abundance Peaks along Climate Gradients but Only Weakly Predicts Distributional Limits.

AbstractLaboratory measurements of physiological traits have long been used to infer the thermal limits and preferences of species in the field. However, it remains unclear how well individual physiological traits scale up to explain broad distribution patterns of species, such as their climatic limits, the breadth of temperatures they occur in, and the conditions at which population abundances are highest. We address these gaps by combining laboratory-measured thermal traits (critical thermal minimum [CTmin], critical thermal maximum [CTmax], and thermal preference [Tpref]) with occurrence and abundance data from 21 species of Anolis lizards collected from extensive mark-resight surveys of communities across the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico and Hispaniola. Our findings suggest that thermal limits do map to distribution boundaries, such that CTmax and CTmin are significant predictors of maximum and minimum environmental temperatures at which species occur in nature, albeit with substantial error. Curiously though, physiological niche breadth (CTmax-CTmin) does not positively correlate with climatic niche breadth. This means that species able to tolerate a wide range of temperatures do not always occur across a broad range of climates, limiting our ability to make clear-cut statements about what constitutes a thermal generalist or specialist. The climatological temperature where population abundance is maximized is the geographic feature best predicted by physiology, yet counterintuitively Tpref performs worse than critical thermal limits at predicting where this abundance peak occurs. Together, our findings suggest that individual physiological responses to temperature do not always translate to distribution patterns in predictable ways, suggesting a substantial role for other factors, such as competition, predation, nonthermal habitat characteristics, and behavioral buffering, in setting range-wide distribution patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信