韩国国民对收入罚款的态度。

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Don Soo Chon
{"title":"韩国国民对收入罚款的态度。","authors":"Don Soo Chon","doi":"10.1177/0306624X251363250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several European countries use income-based fines (i.e., day, unit, or structured fines). Under this system, a judge imposes a fine based on the offense's seriousness and the offender's income. Proponents argue that income-based fines promote equality in punishment and reduce unnecessary imprisonment resulting from fine defaults. However, opponents argue that income-based fines lead to inequality in punishment and are challenging to implement due to problems accessing an offender's assets. Based on these arguments, this study uses the Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice survey to explore Koreans' attitudes and factors relevant to supporting income-based fines (<i>n</i> = 1,063). The findings suggest that most respondents support income-based fines, primarily because income-based fines enhance punishment equality by accounting for or incorporating one's financial status.</p>","PeriodicalId":48041,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","volume":" ","pages":"306624X251363250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Korean Citizens' Attitudes Toward Income-Based Fines.\",\"authors\":\"Don Soo Chon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0306624X251363250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several European countries use income-based fines (i.e., day, unit, or structured fines). Under this system, a judge imposes a fine based on the offense's seriousness and the offender's income. Proponents argue that income-based fines promote equality in punishment and reduce unnecessary imprisonment resulting from fine defaults. However, opponents argue that income-based fines lead to inequality in punishment and are challenging to implement due to problems accessing an offender's assets. Based on these arguments, this study uses the Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice survey to explore Koreans' attitudes and factors relevant to supporting income-based fines (<i>n</i> = 1,063). The findings suggest that most respondents support income-based fines, primarily because income-based fines enhance punishment equality by accounting for or incorporating one's financial status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"306624X251363250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X251363250\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X251363250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些欧洲国家使用基于收入的罚款(即,日,单位或结构性罚款)。在这种制度下,法官根据违法行为的严重程度和违法者的收入处以罚款。支持者认为,基于收入的罚款促进了惩罚的平等,并减少了因罚款违约而导致的不必要监禁。然而,反对者认为,以收入为基础的罚款会导致惩罚的不平等,而且由于难以获得违法者的资产,很难实施。基于这些论点,本研究使用韩国犯罪学和司法研究所的调查来探讨韩国人对支持基于收入的罚款的态度和相关因素(n = 1063)。调查结果表明,大多数受访者支持基于收入的罚款,主要是因为基于收入的罚款通过考虑或纳入一个人的财务状况来增强惩罚的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Korean Citizens' Attitudes Toward Income-Based Fines.

Several European countries use income-based fines (i.e., day, unit, or structured fines). Under this system, a judge imposes a fine based on the offense's seriousness and the offender's income. Proponents argue that income-based fines promote equality in punishment and reduce unnecessary imprisonment resulting from fine defaults. However, opponents argue that income-based fines lead to inequality in punishment and are challenging to implement due to problems accessing an offender's assets. Based on these arguments, this study uses the Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice survey to explore Koreans' attitudes and factors relevant to supporting income-based fines (n = 1,063). The findings suggest that most respondents support income-based fines, primarily because income-based fines enhance punishment equality by accounting for or incorporating one's financial status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信