Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Jesse Wennik, Pamela Swedlow, Julia Wu, Wendy Hartogensis, Jhia L N Jackson, Maria T Chao
{"title":"基于群体的综合疼痛管理:安全网初级保健的一项因子随机试验的可行性。","authors":"Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Jesse Wennik, Pamela Swedlow, Julia Wu, Wendy Hartogensis, Jhia L N Jackson, Maria T Chao","doi":"10.1177/21501319251360113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a pragmatic randomized trial evaluating group-based non-pharmacologic approaches to increase access in primary care and improve pain-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 2 × 2 factorial trial assessed two 12-week interventions: group acupuncture and integrative group medical visits (IGMVs). Adults with chronic pain lasting ≥3 months were enrolled from safety-net primary care clinics. Participants were randomized to group acupuncture, IGMVs, both, or neither (usual care). We analyzed data using linear mixed models, ANCOVA, and abductive qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 44 participants were randomized (25 English-speaking and 19 Spanish-speaking); 59% were female (mean age = 55 years), 21% African American or Black, 52% Latine, 21% non-Latine White, and 5% more than 1 race; and 78% had annual income <$25 000. At baseline, the average duration of chronic pain was 13.0 years, and the mean pain impact score was 36.0 (SD = 6.4). Participants randomized to interventions attended 6 of 12 sessions on average; 89% would participate again; and 86% reported clinically relevant pain improvements versus 20% in usual care (<i>P</i> < .001). Qualitative data revealed substantial barriers to accessing multimodal care and social benefits of group-based models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group-based integrative pain management is feasible and acceptable when co-located within safety-net primary care.<b>Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number</b>: NCT05906784 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05906784).</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251360113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group-Based Integrative Pain Management: Feasibility of a Factorial Randomized Trial in Safety-Net Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Jesse Wennik, Pamela Swedlow, Julia Wu, Wendy Hartogensis, Jhia L N Jackson, Maria T Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501319251360113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a pragmatic randomized trial evaluating group-based non-pharmacologic approaches to increase access in primary care and improve pain-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 2 × 2 factorial trial assessed two 12-week interventions: group acupuncture and integrative group medical visits (IGMVs). Adults with chronic pain lasting ≥3 months were enrolled from safety-net primary care clinics. Participants were randomized to group acupuncture, IGMVs, both, or neither (usual care). We analyzed data using linear mixed models, ANCOVA, and abductive qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 44 participants were randomized (25 English-speaking and 19 Spanish-speaking); 59% were female (mean age = 55 years), 21% African American or Black, 52% Latine, 21% non-Latine White, and 5% more than 1 race; and 78% had annual income <$25 000. At baseline, the average duration of chronic pain was 13.0 years, and the mean pain impact score was 36.0 (SD = 6.4). Participants randomized to interventions attended 6 of 12 sessions on average; 89% would participate again; and 86% reported clinically relevant pain improvements versus 20% in usual care (<i>P</i> < .001). Qualitative data revealed substantial barriers to accessing multimodal care and social benefits of group-based models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group-based integrative pain management is feasible and acceptable when co-located within safety-net primary care.<b>Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number</b>: NCT05906784 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05906784).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"21501319251360113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251360113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251360113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Group-Based Integrative Pain Management: Feasibility of a Factorial Randomized Trial in Safety-Net Primary Care.
Purpose: This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a pragmatic randomized trial evaluating group-based non-pharmacologic approaches to increase access in primary care and improve pain-related outcomes.
Methods: This 2 × 2 factorial trial assessed two 12-week interventions: group acupuncture and integrative group medical visits (IGMVs). Adults with chronic pain lasting ≥3 months were enrolled from safety-net primary care clinics. Participants were randomized to group acupuncture, IGMVs, both, or neither (usual care). We analyzed data using linear mixed models, ANCOVA, and abductive qualitative analysis.
Results: Overall, 44 participants were randomized (25 English-speaking and 19 Spanish-speaking); 59% were female (mean age = 55 years), 21% African American or Black, 52% Latine, 21% non-Latine White, and 5% more than 1 race; and 78% had annual income <$25 000. At baseline, the average duration of chronic pain was 13.0 years, and the mean pain impact score was 36.0 (SD = 6.4). Participants randomized to interventions attended 6 of 12 sessions on average; 89% would participate again; and 86% reported clinically relevant pain improvements versus 20% in usual care (P < .001). Qualitative data revealed substantial barriers to accessing multimodal care and social benefits of group-based models.
Conclusion: Group-based integrative pain management is feasible and acceptable when co-located within safety-net primary care.Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05906784 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05906784).