Chenguang Zhang, Federico Tessari, James Hermus, Himanshu Akolkar, Neville Hogan, Andrew B Schwartz
{"title":"任务相关刚度在多个方向上的调整。","authors":"Chenguang Zhang, Federico Tessari, James Hermus, Himanshu Akolkar, Neville Hogan, Andrew B Schwartz","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-14989-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to robots, humans can rapidly and elegantly modulate the impedance of their arms and hands during initial contact with objects. Anticipating collisions by setting mechanical impedance to counter near-instantaneous changes in force and displacement is one reason we excel at manipulating objects. We investigated the ability to set impedance in an object interaction task with rapid changes in force and displacement, like those encountered during manipulation in different directions. Subjects (n = 20) predictively co-activated antagonist muscles to adjust one component of the impedance - stiffness - to match the task demands before the movement began, irrespective of movement direction. Subjects adopted the minimal stiffness needed to complete the task, but when pushed to the most difficult condition, they were limited by their ability to produce high stiffness rather than large force. This robust and simple strategy ensured task success at the expense of energy efficiency. Our results confirm the ability of humans to predictively set and control mechanical impedance in task-relevant directions in anticipation of breaking contact. This offers the prospect that future investigations will find neural correlates of impedance, which in turn, could improve the ability of neuro-prosthetic limbs to interact with objects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuning of task-relevant stiffness in multiple directions.\",\"authors\":\"Chenguang Zhang, Federico Tessari, James Hermus, Himanshu Akolkar, Neville Hogan, Andrew B Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-14989-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In contrast to robots, humans can rapidly and elegantly modulate the impedance of their arms and hands during initial contact with objects. Anticipating collisions by setting mechanical impedance to counter near-instantaneous changes in force and displacement is one reason we excel at manipulating objects. We investigated the ability to set impedance in an object interaction task with rapid changes in force and displacement, like those encountered during manipulation in different directions. Subjects (n = 20) predictively co-activated antagonist muscles to adjust one component of the impedance - stiffness - to match the task demands before the movement began, irrespective of movement direction. Subjects adopted the minimal stiffness needed to complete the task, but when pushed to the most difficult condition, they were limited by their ability to produce high stiffness rather than large force. This robust and simple strategy ensured task success at the expense of energy efficiency. Our results confirm the ability of humans to predictively set and control mechanical impedance in task-relevant directions in anticipation of breaking contact. This offers the prospect that future investigations will find neural correlates of impedance, which in turn, could improve the ability of neuro-prosthetic limbs to interact with objects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"29916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14989-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14989-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tuning of task-relevant stiffness in multiple directions.
In contrast to robots, humans can rapidly and elegantly modulate the impedance of their arms and hands during initial contact with objects. Anticipating collisions by setting mechanical impedance to counter near-instantaneous changes in force and displacement is one reason we excel at manipulating objects. We investigated the ability to set impedance in an object interaction task with rapid changes in force and displacement, like those encountered during manipulation in different directions. Subjects (n = 20) predictively co-activated antagonist muscles to adjust one component of the impedance - stiffness - to match the task demands before the movement began, irrespective of movement direction. Subjects adopted the minimal stiffness needed to complete the task, but when pushed to the most difficult condition, they were limited by their ability to produce high stiffness rather than large force. This robust and simple strategy ensured task success at the expense of energy efficiency. Our results confirm the ability of humans to predictively set and control mechanical impedance in task-relevant directions in anticipation of breaking contact. This offers the prospect that future investigations will find neural correlates of impedance, which in turn, could improve the ability of neuro-prosthetic limbs to interact with objects.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.