了解在初级保健中使用多种药物的少数民族社区老年人(60岁及以上)中药物优化的挑战:一个现实的审查方案。

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nesrein Hamed, Clare Bates, Muhammed Umair Khan, Ian Maidment
{"title":"了解在初级保健中使用多种药物的少数民族社区老年人(60岁及以上)中药物优化的挑战:一个现实的审查方案。","authors":"Nesrein Hamed, Clare Bates, Muhammed Umair Khan, Ian Maidment","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02920-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Across many countries, the number of older people from ethnic minority communities is growing due to ageing populations and migration trends. In England and Wales, the population of older people from ethnic minority communities, particularly those aged 60 and above, is also increasing. This demographic change, often accompanied by the prevalence of polypharmacy in these communities, presents unique challenges in the context of medicine optimisation. Failure in this context can lead to exacerbated health disparities, non-adherence, and inappropriate prescribing (whether over or under). Building on the MEMORABLE study exploring medication management in older people, this review aims to understand the complexities of medicine optimisation, exploring what works and does not work, when and under what circumstances for older people from ethnic minority communities. Key possible areas include cultural backgrounds, traditional beliefs, and systemic barriers that may influence medicine optimisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the five-step realist approach that firstly establishes initial programme theories to highlight the expected context, mechanisms, and outcomes. Then a formal search for evidence will be conducted. The third step involves the selection and appraisal of studies screened by title, abstract/keywords and full text based on exclusion/inclusion criteria. Then data from these studies will be extracted, recorded, and coded. The final step will synthesise this information, to test, refine, and expand our initial programme theories and generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations to better understand medicine optimisation in these communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will be conducted in line with the RAMESES reporting standards. By explaining what works, for whom, and in what contexts, the review will generate theory-informed insights into MO for older people from ethnic minority communities with polypharmacy in primary care. These findings can support the development of culturally responsive, person-centred interventions. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023432204.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the challenges of medicine optimisation among older people (aged 60 years and above) from ethnic minority communities with polypharmacy in primary care: a realist review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Nesrein Hamed, Clare Bates, Muhammed Umair Khan, Ian Maidment\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02920-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Across many countries, the number of older people from ethnic minority communities is growing due to ageing populations and migration trends. In England and Wales, the population of older people from ethnic minority communities, particularly those aged 60 and above, is also increasing. This demographic change, often accompanied by the prevalence of polypharmacy in these communities, presents unique challenges in the context of medicine optimisation. Failure in this context can lead to exacerbated health disparities, non-adherence, and inappropriate prescribing (whether over or under). Building on the MEMORABLE study exploring medication management in older people, this review aims to understand the complexities of medicine optimisation, exploring what works and does not work, when and under what circumstances for older people from ethnic minority communities. Key possible areas include cultural backgrounds, traditional beliefs, and systemic barriers that may influence medicine optimisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the five-step realist approach that firstly establishes initial programme theories to highlight the expected context, mechanisms, and outcomes. Then a formal search for evidence will be conducted. The third step involves the selection and appraisal of studies screened by title, abstract/keywords and full text based on exclusion/inclusion criteria. Then data from these studies will be extracted, recorded, and coded. The final step will synthesise this information, to test, refine, and expand our initial programme theories and generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations to better understand medicine optimisation in these communities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will be conducted in line with the RAMESES reporting standards. By explaining what works, for whom, and in what contexts, the review will generate theory-informed insights into MO for older people from ethnic minority communities with polypharmacy in primary care. These findings can support the development of culturally responsive, person-centred interventions. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023432204.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02920-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02920-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在许多国家,由于人口老龄化和移民趋势,少数民族社区的老年人数量正在增加。在英格兰和威尔士,来自少数民族社区的老年人,特别是60岁及以上的老年人也在增加。这种人口结构的变化,往往伴随着这些社区中多种药物的流行,在药物优化的背景下提出了独特的挑战。这方面的失败可能导致健康差距加剧、不遵守规定和处方不当(无论是过量还是不足)。在探索老年人药物管理的难忘研究的基础上,本综述旨在了解药物优化的复杂性,探索什么对少数民族社区的老年人有效,什么时候有效,在什么情况下无效。关键的可能领域包括可能影响药物优化的文化背景、传统信仰和系统性障碍。方法:回顾将遵循五步现实主义方法,首先建立初步的计划理论,以突出预期的背景、机制和结果。然后将进行正式的证据搜查。第三步是根据排除/纳入标准对题目、摘要/关键词和全文筛选的研究进行选择和评价。然后从这些研究中提取数据,记录并编码。最后一步将综合这些信息,测试、完善和扩展我们最初的规划理论,并生成情境-机制-结果配置,以更好地理解这些社区的药物优化。讨论:本次评审将按照RAMESES报告标准进行。通过解释什么有效,对谁有效,以及在什么情况下有效,该综述将产生关于在初级保健中使用多种药物的少数民族社区老年人的MO的理论依据见解。这些发现可以支持文化响应、以人为本的干预措施的发展。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物和在相关国家和国际会议上的演讲进行分享。试验注册:系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42023432204。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the challenges of medicine optimisation among older people (aged 60 years and above) from ethnic minority communities with polypharmacy in primary care: a realist review protocol.

Background: Across many countries, the number of older people from ethnic minority communities is growing due to ageing populations and migration trends. In England and Wales, the population of older people from ethnic minority communities, particularly those aged 60 and above, is also increasing. This demographic change, often accompanied by the prevalence of polypharmacy in these communities, presents unique challenges in the context of medicine optimisation. Failure in this context can lead to exacerbated health disparities, non-adherence, and inappropriate prescribing (whether over or under). Building on the MEMORABLE study exploring medication management in older people, this review aims to understand the complexities of medicine optimisation, exploring what works and does not work, when and under what circumstances for older people from ethnic minority communities. Key possible areas include cultural backgrounds, traditional beliefs, and systemic barriers that may influence medicine optimisation.

Methods: The review will follow the five-step realist approach that firstly establishes initial programme theories to highlight the expected context, mechanisms, and outcomes. Then a formal search for evidence will be conducted. The third step involves the selection and appraisal of studies screened by title, abstract/keywords and full text based on exclusion/inclusion criteria. Then data from these studies will be extracted, recorded, and coded. The final step will synthesise this information, to test, refine, and expand our initial programme theories and generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations to better understand medicine optimisation in these communities.

Discussion: This review will be conducted in line with the RAMESES reporting standards. By explaining what works, for whom, and in what contexts, the review will generate theory-informed insights into MO for older people from ethnic minority communities with polypharmacy in primary care. These findings can support the development of culturally responsive, person-centred interventions. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023432204.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信