血尿素氮/白蛋白比值对危重充血性心力衰竭患者预后的独立意义。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jingxiang Yang, Jiuyi Wang, Kai Wang
{"title":"血尿素氮/白蛋白比值对危重充血性心力衰竭患者预后的独立意义。","authors":"Jingxiang Yang, Jiuyi Wang, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-16383-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New studies have revealed an association between chronic heart failure, the severity of septic shock, and the blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio (BAR). Nevertheless, its role in congestive heart failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between BAR and mortality among these patients. The present study analyzed data from the MIMIC-IV (version 2.2) database, targeting patients with congestive heart failure. The study outcome was all-cause mortality within the first year after discharge. Patients were categorized into three groups-T1, T2, and T3-based on tertiles of BAR levels. To explore the relationship between BAR and mortality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders, were employed. Additionally, a dose-response relationship between BAR and mortality risk was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline model and threshold effect analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted across diverse populations to assess the prognostic value of BAR. Furthermore, the predictive capabilities of blood urea nitrogen, albumin, blood urea nitrogen combined with albumin, and BAR were assessed through receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cohort comprised 4506 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that all-cause mortality was significantly elevated in patients within the higher BAR tertiles (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that patients in the T2 (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06 ~ 1.36) and T3 groups (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18 ~ 1.57) had a significant increase in mortality risk relative to the T1 group (p for linear trend < 0.001). Most subgroups showed this association, with the exception of variations of levels in creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase. Notably, the BAR demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality compared to blood urea nitrogen or serum albumin alone, while exhibiting comparable performance to their combined measure. Among ICU patients with congestive heart failure, an elevated BAR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause 1-year mortality, particularly in those with less impaired liver and kidney function. Therefore, BAR may be measured to comprehensively evaluate the patients' prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"29971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent prognostic importance of blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Jingxiang Yang, Jiuyi Wang, Kai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-16383-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New studies have revealed an association between chronic heart failure, the severity of septic shock, and the blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio (BAR). Nevertheless, its role in congestive heart failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between BAR and mortality among these patients. The present study analyzed data from the MIMIC-IV (version 2.2) database, targeting patients with congestive heart failure. The study outcome was all-cause mortality within the first year after discharge. Patients were categorized into three groups-T1, T2, and T3-based on tertiles of BAR levels. To explore the relationship between BAR and mortality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders, were employed. Additionally, a dose-response relationship between BAR and mortality risk was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline model and threshold effect analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted across diverse populations to assess the prognostic value of BAR. Furthermore, the predictive capabilities of blood urea nitrogen, albumin, blood urea nitrogen combined with albumin, and BAR were assessed through receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cohort comprised 4506 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that all-cause mortality was significantly elevated in patients within the higher BAR tertiles (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that patients in the T2 (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06 ~ 1.36) and T3 groups (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18 ~ 1.57) had a significant increase in mortality risk relative to the T1 group (p for linear trend < 0.001). Most subgroups showed this association, with the exception of variations of levels in creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase. Notably, the BAR demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality compared to blood urea nitrogen or serum albumin alone, while exhibiting comparable performance to their combined measure. Among ICU patients with congestive heart failure, an elevated BAR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause 1-year mortality, particularly in those with less impaired liver and kidney function. Therefore, BAR may be measured to comprehensively evaluate the patients' prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"29971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16383-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16383-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的研究揭示了慢性心力衰竭、脓毒性休克的严重程度和血液尿素氮白蛋白比(BAR)之间的关联。然而,它在重症监护病房的充血性心力衰竭患者中的作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨BAR与这些患者死亡率之间的关系。本研究分析了来自MIMIC-IV(2.2版)数据库的数据,目标是充血性心力衰竭患者。研究结果为出院后一年内的全因死亡率。根据BAR水平的分位数将患者分为t1、T2和t3三组。为了探讨BAR与死亡率之间的关系,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和多变量Cox比例风险模型,对潜在混杂因素进行校正。此外,使用限制三次样条模型和阈值效应分析评估了BAR与死亡风险之间的剂量-反应关系。在不同人群中进行亚组分析,以评估BAR的预后价值。此外,通过受试者工作特征分析,评估血尿素氮、白蛋白、血尿素氮联合白蛋白和BAR的预测能力。该队列包括4506名诊断为充血性心力衰竭的患者。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,BAR值较高的患者的全因死亡率显著升高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent prognostic importance of blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure.

New studies have revealed an association between chronic heart failure, the severity of septic shock, and the blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio (BAR). Nevertheless, its role in congestive heart failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between BAR and mortality among these patients. The present study analyzed data from the MIMIC-IV (version 2.2) database, targeting patients with congestive heart failure. The study outcome was all-cause mortality within the first year after discharge. Patients were categorized into three groups-T1, T2, and T3-based on tertiles of BAR levels. To explore the relationship between BAR and mortality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential confounders, were employed. Additionally, a dose-response relationship between BAR and mortality risk was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline model and threshold effect analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted across diverse populations to assess the prognostic value of BAR. Furthermore, the predictive capabilities of blood urea nitrogen, albumin, blood urea nitrogen combined with albumin, and BAR were assessed through receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cohort comprised 4506 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that all-cause mortality was significantly elevated in patients within the higher BAR tertiles (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that patients in the T2 (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06 ~ 1.36) and T3 groups (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18 ~ 1.57) had a significant increase in mortality risk relative to the T1 group (p for linear trend < 0.001). Most subgroups showed this association, with the exception of variations of levels in creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase. Notably, the BAR demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality compared to blood urea nitrogen or serum albumin alone, while exhibiting comparable performance to their combined measure. Among ICU patients with congestive heart failure, an elevated BAR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause 1-year mortality, particularly in those with less impaired liver and kidney function. Therefore, BAR may be measured to comprehensively evaluate the patients' prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信