联合区域麻醉技术促进心脏手术后恢复:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dou Dou, Lu Wang, Su Yuan, Yuan Jia, Fuxia Yan
{"title":"联合区域麻醉技术促进心脏手术后恢复:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Dou Dou, Lu Wang, Su Yuan, Yuan Jia, Fuxia Yan","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional anesthetic techniques are applied in cardiac surgery to improve postoperative pain and accelerate recovery. Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) has been proved to provide ideal analgesia for cardiac surgery, but the effects of combing regional anesthetic techniques on postoperative recovery are uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective and randomized controlled trial at Fuwai Hospital from 1 June 2024 to 3 July 2024. Eighty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to be allocated in the intervention group (PIFB combined with RSB) or control group (without regional blocks). The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72 h, postoperative pain scores, time to extubation, length of stay, medical expenses in hospital and postoperative morbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QoR-15 global score at 24 h after cardiac surgery was 122.35 ± 6.71 in the intervention group vs 115.30 ± 5.90 in the control group (P < .001). The proportion of patients experiencing better quality of recovery (Qor-15 ≥ 118) was higher in the intervention group (77.5% vs 55%, P = .033). Postoperative pain scores were 1.90 ± 0.18 in the intervention group compared to 2.95 ± 0.99 in the control group (P = .027) at 24 h. Time to extubation was earlier in the intervention group (274.40 ± 98.36 vs 741.28 ± 93.82 min, P < .001). There were no statistically differences in Qor-15 at 72 h and other recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of PIFB combined with RSB could improve quality of recovery and relieve postoperative pain for patients following cardiac surgery. Key message What is already known on this topic Previous studies have demonstrated that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks effectively reduce postoperative pain in cardiac surgery patients. However, whether these techniques further enhance overall postoperative recovery remained unclear. What this study adds This trial revealed that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks improved postoperative QoR-15 scores, and combined regional techniques further improved recovery without compromising analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The findings support applying combined nerve blocks into enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery, offering evidence to optimize postoperative analgesia strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined regional anesthetic techniques enhance postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dou Dou, Lu Wang, Su Yuan, Yuan Jia, Fuxia Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional anesthetic techniques are applied in cardiac surgery to improve postoperative pain and accelerate recovery. Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) has been proved to provide ideal analgesia for cardiac surgery, but the effects of combing regional anesthetic techniques on postoperative recovery are uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective and randomized controlled trial at Fuwai Hospital from 1 June 2024 to 3 July 2024. Eighty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to be allocated in the intervention group (PIFB combined with RSB) or control group (without regional blocks). The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72 h, postoperative pain scores, time to extubation, length of stay, medical expenses in hospital and postoperative morbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QoR-15 global score at 24 h after cardiac surgery was 122.35 ± 6.71 in the intervention group vs 115.30 ± 5.90 in the control group (P < .001). The proportion of patients experiencing better quality of recovery (Qor-15 ≥ 118) was higher in the intervention group (77.5% vs 55%, P = .033). Postoperative pain scores were 1.90 ± 0.18 in the intervention group compared to 2.95 ± 0.99 in the control group (P = .027) at 24 h. Time to extubation was earlier in the intervention group (274.40 ± 98.36 vs 741.28 ± 93.82 min, P < .001). There were no statistically differences in Qor-15 at 72 h and other recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of PIFB combined with RSB could improve quality of recovery and relieve postoperative pain for patients following cardiac surgery. Key message What is already known on this topic Previous studies have demonstrated that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks effectively reduce postoperative pain in cardiac surgery patients. However, whether these techniques further enhance overall postoperative recovery remained unclear. What this study adds This trial revealed that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks improved postoperative QoR-15 scores, and combined regional techniques further improved recovery without compromising analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The findings support applying combined nerve blocks into enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery, offering evidence to optimize postoperative analgesia strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:区域麻醉技术应用于心脏手术,以改善术后疼痛和加速恢复。胸肋间筋膜阻滞(PIFB)联合直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)已被证明为心脏手术提供理想的镇痛,但结合区域麻醉技术对术后恢复的影响尚不确定。方法:于2024年6月1日至2024年7月3日在阜外医院进行前瞻性随机对照试验。80例经体外循环择期心脏手术的患者按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组(PIFB联合RSB)或对照组(无区域阻滞)。主要观察指标为术后24小时15项康复质量(QoR-15)问卷整体评分。次要结局包括72 h时QoR-15、术后疼痛评分、拔管时间、住院时间、住院医疗费用和术后发病率。结果:干预组心脏术后24 h QoR-15全局评分为122.35±6.71,对照组为115.30±5.90 (P)。结论:PIFB联合RSB可提高心脏术后患者的康复质量,减轻术后疼痛。先前的研究表明,超声引导下的神经阻滞可以有效地减轻心脏手术患者的术后疼痛。然而,这些技术是否能进一步提高整体术后恢复仍不清楚。本研究补充说明:本试验显示超声引导神经阻滞可提高术后QoR-15评分,结合局部技术可在不影响镇痛的情况下进一步改善恢复。研究结果支持将联合神经阻滞应用于心脏手术的增强恢复方案,为优化术后镇痛策略提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined regional anesthetic techniques enhance postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Regional anesthetic techniques are applied in cardiac surgery to improve postoperative pain and accelerate recovery. Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) combined with rectus sheath block (RSB) has been proved to provide ideal analgesia for cardiac surgery, but the effects of combing regional anesthetic techniques on postoperative recovery are uncertain.

Methods: This is a prospective and randomized controlled trial at Fuwai Hospital from 1 June 2024 to 3 July 2024. Eighty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to be allocated in the intervention group (PIFB combined with RSB) or control group (without regional blocks). The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72 h, postoperative pain scores, time to extubation, length of stay, medical expenses in hospital and postoperative morbidities.

Results: The QoR-15 global score at 24 h after cardiac surgery was 122.35 ± 6.71 in the intervention group vs 115.30 ± 5.90 in the control group (P < .001). The proportion of patients experiencing better quality of recovery (Qor-15 ≥ 118) was higher in the intervention group (77.5% vs 55%, P = .033). Postoperative pain scores were 1.90 ± 0.18 in the intervention group compared to 2.95 ± 0.99 in the control group (P = .027) at 24 h. Time to extubation was earlier in the intervention group (274.40 ± 98.36 vs 741.28 ± 93.82 min, P < .001). There were no statistically differences in Qor-15 at 72 h and other recovery outcomes.

Conclusion: The administration of PIFB combined with RSB could improve quality of recovery and relieve postoperative pain for patients following cardiac surgery. Key message What is already known on this topic Previous studies have demonstrated that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks effectively reduce postoperative pain in cardiac surgery patients. However, whether these techniques further enhance overall postoperative recovery remained unclear. What this study adds This trial revealed that ultrasound-guided nerve blocks improved postoperative QoR-15 scores, and combined regional techniques further improved recovery without compromising analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy The findings support applying combined nerve blocks into enhanced recovery protocols for cardiac surgery, offering evidence to optimize postoperative analgesia strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信