回到基础:为什么开放式腹股沟疝修补术仍然值得关注?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kaushik Bhattacharya, Dhananjaya Sharma
{"title":"回到基础:为什么开放式腹股沟疝修补术仍然值得关注?","authors":"Kaushik Bhattacharya, Dhananjaya Sharma","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an age of surgical innovation, the shift toward minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair demands critical reappraisal. Large-scale data and registry analyses reveal no consistent superiority of laparoscopic or robotic techniques over the traditional open repair, particularly regarding recurrence, complications, chronic pain, or patient satisfaction. The open Lichtenstein approach, often undervalued, remains a pragmatic, cost-effective, and evidence-based option, especially in high-risk or resource-limited settings. The enduring appeal of minimally invasive techniques appears increasingly driven by industry, training hierarchies, perceived prestige, and surgical showmanship rather than clear patient benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to basics: why open groin hernia repair still deserves center stage?\",\"authors\":\"Kaushik Bhattacharya, Dhananjaya Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In an age of surgical innovation, the shift toward minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair demands critical reappraisal. Large-scale data and registry analyses reveal no consistent superiority of laparoscopic or robotic techniques over the traditional open repair, particularly regarding recurrence, complications, chronic pain, or patient satisfaction. The open Lichtenstein approach, often undervalued, remains a pragmatic, cost-effective, and evidence-based option, especially in high-risk or resource-limited settings. The enduring appeal of minimally invasive techniques appears increasingly driven by industry, training hierarchies, perceived prestige, and surgical showmanship rather than clear patient benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在外科手术创新的时代,向微创腹股沟疝修补的转变需要关键的重新评估。大规模数据和注册分析显示,腹腔镜或机器人技术与传统的开放式修复相比没有一致的优势,特别是在复发、并发症、慢性疼痛或患者满意度方面。开放的列支敦士登方法经常被低估,但仍然是一种务实、具有成本效益和基于证据的选择,特别是在高风险或资源有限的环境中。微创技术的持久吸引力似乎越来越多地受到行业、培训等级、感知声望和手术表演技巧的驱动,而不是明确的患者利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Back to basics: why open groin hernia repair still deserves center stage?

In an age of surgical innovation, the shift toward minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair demands critical reappraisal. Large-scale data and registry analyses reveal no consistent superiority of laparoscopic or robotic techniques over the traditional open repair, particularly regarding recurrence, complications, chronic pain, or patient satisfaction. The open Lichtenstein approach, often undervalued, remains a pragmatic, cost-effective, and evidence-based option, especially in high-risk or resource-limited settings. The enduring appeal of minimally invasive techniques appears increasingly driven by industry, training hierarchies, perceived prestige, and surgical showmanship rather than clear patient benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信