Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Francesco D'Antonio, Anam Monteagudo, Andrea Kaelin Agten, Yaakov Melcer, Ron Maymon
{"title":"剖宫产瘢痕妊娠谱:子宫剖宫产瘢痕妊娠报告的标准化分类和术语。","authors":"Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Francesco D'Antonio, Anam Monteagudo, Andrea Kaelin Agten, Yaakov Melcer, Ron Maymon","doi":"10.1002/jum.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article contains the academic, but more importantly clinical debate of the terminology of pregnancies after cesarean deliveries, namely cesarean scar pregnancies as well as increasingly relevant social aspects determining their management. Its main purpose is to offer a solution to the controversy created by the debate about the terminology of pregnancies implanted in, or on the uterine scar left behind by a cesarean delivery. The 2 opposing terms creating the argument are: cesarean scar pregnancy and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. They seem to exhibit a spectrum of different pathophysiologic properties and outcomes with different outcomes almost regardless of their expectant or surgically management. Based upon the above and modeled by the creation of the entity called \"placenta accreta spectrum\" which also contains clinico-pathologically slightly but different entities, we suggest unifying the terminology of cesarean scar pregnancies. By creating an all-encompassing term: cesarean scar pregnancy spectrum that includes the different presentations, various levels of their clinical severities and associated complications. Categorizing cesarean scar pregnancies as \"on-scar cesarean scar pregnancy (oCSP)\" and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSeP), distinguishes the clinical presentation and risk stratification. While all CSPs carry risk, this not only will make the reporting to permit some shared decision-making for expectant management of oCSP, but also will better inform the patient of the potential risk and the treatment for CSeP depending on which end of the spectrum the cesarean scar pregnancy was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Spectrum: A Proposed Standardized Classification and Terminology for the Reporting of Pregnancy Developing in Uterine Cesarean Scar.\",\"authors\":\"Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Francesco D'Antonio, Anam Monteagudo, Andrea Kaelin Agten, Yaakov Melcer, Ron Maymon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article contains the academic, but more importantly clinical debate of the terminology of pregnancies after cesarean deliveries, namely cesarean scar pregnancies as well as increasingly relevant social aspects determining their management. Its main purpose is to offer a solution to the controversy created by the debate about the terminology of pregnancies implanted in, or on the uterine scar left behind by a cesarean delivery. The 2 opposing terms creating the argument are: cesarean scar pregnancy and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. They seem to exhibit a spectrum of different pathophysiologic properties and outcomes with different outcomes almost regardless of their expectant or surgically management. Based upon the above and modeled by the creation of the entity called \\\"placenta accreta spectrum\\\" which also contains clinico-pathologically slightly but different entities, we suggest unifying the terminology of cesarean scar pregnancies. By creating an all-encompassing term: cesarean scar pregnancy spectrum that includes the different presentations, various levels of their clinical severities and associated complications. Categorizing cesarean scar pregnancies as \\\"on-scar cesarean scar pregnancy (oCSP)\\\" and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSeP), distinguishes the clinical presentation and risk stratification. While all CSPs carry risk, this not only will make the reporting to permit some shared decision-making for expectant management of oCSP, but also will better inform the patient of the potential risk and the treatment for CSeP depending on which end of the spectrum the cesarean scar pregnancy was found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Spectrum: A Proposed Standardized Classification and Terminology for the Reporting of Pregnancy Developing in Uterine Cesarean Scar.
This article contains the academic, but more importantly clinical debate of the terminology of pregnancies after cesarean deliveries, namely cesarean scar pregnancies as well as increasingly relevant social aspects determining their management. Its main purpose is to offer a solution to the controversy created by the debate about the terminology of pregnancies implanted in, or on the uterine scar left behind by a cesarean delivery. The 2 opposing terms creating the argument are: cesarean scar pregnancy and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. They seem to exhibit a spectrum of different pathophysiologic properties and outcomes with different outcomes almost regardless of their expectant or surgically management. Based upon the above and modeled by the creation of the entity called "placenta accreta spectrum" which also contains clinico-pathologically slightly but different entities, we suggest unifying the terminology of cesarean scar pregnancies. By creating an all-encompassing term: cesarean scar pregnancy spectrum that includes the different presentations, various levels of their clinical severities and associated complications. Categorizing cesarean scar pregnancies as "on-scar cesarean scar pregnancy (oCSP)" and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSeP), distinguishes the clinical presentation and risk stratification. While all CSPs carry risk, this not only will make the reporting to permit some shared decision-making for expectant management of oCSP, but also will better inform the patient of the potential risk and the treatment for CSeP depending on which end of the spectrum the cesarean scar pregnancy was found.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound