澳大利亚放射肿瘤学护士角色、职责及劳动力特点调查研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Michelle Roach, Pauline Rose, Diana Ngo, Anisha Pradhan, Eliza Bailey, Sylvia Barker, Stacey Buxton, Meg Hughes, Karen Jones, Paula Macleod, Kirsten Oataway, Gabrielle Vigar, Gemma McErlean
{"title":"澳大利亚放射肿瘤学护士角色、职责及劳动力特点调查研究。","authors":"Michelle Roach,&nbsp;Pauline Rose,&nbsp;Diana Ngo,&nbsp;Anisha Pradhan,&nbsp;Eliza Bailey,&nbsp;Sylvia Barker,&nbsp;Stacey Buxton,&nbsp;Meg Hughes,&nbsp;Karen Jones,&nbsp;Paula Macleod,&nbsp;Kirsten Oataway,&nbsp;Gabrielle Vigar,&nbsp;Gemma McErlean","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Radiation Oncology Nurses (RONs) are key members of the radiation oncology team; however, the role of the RON is not always clear. The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the RON workforce in Australia, to describe the roles and responsibilities of RONs, and to identify challenges and job satisfaction of RONs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a two-part multi-methods survey study. Two self-reported questionnaires were distributed online using purposive and snowball sampling: Radiation Oncology Facility Survey (ROFS) and RON Workforce Survey (RONWS). The surveys used tick boxes, Likert scale and open and closed-ended questions. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables; mean/standard deviation for continuous variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 42 responses were received for the ROFS and 139 for the RONWS, representing all States and Territories in Australia except the Australian Capital Territory (ACT): 52% were metropolitan and 50% were public facilities. Only 17% reported radiation oncology specific training, but 58% had plans to further their education. 80% reported being satisfied with their career and position, believing their role was recognised and generally respected among colleagues and patients. Areas of dissatisfaction included salary, staffing resources and opportunities for advancement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This is the largest study of RONs in Australia, revealing that RON is a satisfying oncology specialty. Data from this study can be used to identify opportunities for improvement in staffing, engagement and retention of RONs, possibly leading to the development of national guidelines for radiation oncology nursing in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 6","pages":"670-680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey Study on the Roles, Responsibilities and Workforce Characteristics of Radiation Oncology Nurses in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Roach,&nbsp;Pauline Rose,&nbsp;Diana Ngo,&nbsp;Anisha Pradhan,&nbsp;Eliza Bailey,&nbsp;Sylvia Barker,&nbsp;Stacey Buxton,&nbsp;Meg Hughes,&nbsp;Karen Jones,&nbsp;Paula Macleod,&nbsp;Kirsten Oataway,&nbsp;Gabrielle Vigar,&nbsp;Gemma McErlean\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiation Oncology Nurses (RONs) are key members of the radiation oncology team; however, the role of the RON is not always clear. The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the RON workforce in Australia, to describe the roles and responsibilities of RONs, and to identify challenges and job satisfaction of RONs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a two-part multi-methods survey study. Two self-reported questionnaires were distributed online using purposive and snowball sampling: Radiation Oncology Facility Survey (ROFS) and RON Workforce Survey (RONWS). The surveys used tick boxes, Likert scale and open and closed-ended questions. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables; mean/standard deviation for continuous variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 42 responses were received for the ROFS and 139 for the RONWS, representing all States and Territories in Australia except the Australian Capital Territory (ACT): 52% were metropolitan and 50% were public facilities. Only 17% reported radiation oncology specific training, but 58% had plans to further their education. 80% reported being satisfied with their career and position, believing their role was recognised and generally respected among colleagues and patients. Areas of dissatisfaction included salary, staffing resources and opportunities for advancement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is the largest study of RONs in Australia, revealing that RON is a satisfying oncology specialty. Data from this study can be used to identify opportunities for improvement in staffing, engagement and retention of RONs, possibly leading to the development of national guidelines for radiation oncology nursing in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"670-680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:放射肿瘤学护士(RONs)是放射肿瘤学团队的重要成员;然而,RON的角色并不总是明确的。本研究的目的是提供澳大利亚RON劳动力的概述,描述RON的角色和责任,并确定RON的挑战和工作满意度。方法:采用两部分多方法调查研究。两份自我报告的调查问卷采用有目的和滚雪球抽样的方式在线分发:放射肿瘤学设施调查(ROFS)和放射肿瘤学工作人员调查(RONWS)。调查使用了勾选框、李克特量表以及开放式和封闭式问题。计算分类变量的频率和百分比;连续变量的均值/标准差。结果:共收到42份关于ROFS和139份关于RONWS的回复,代表了除澳大利亚首都直辖区(ACT)外的澳大利亚所有州和地区:52%是大都市,50%是公共设施。只有17%的人表示接受过放射肿瘤学的专门培训,但58%的人计划继续深造。80%的人对自己的职业和职位感到满意,认为自己的角色得到了同事和病人的认可和尊重。不满意的领域包括工资、人力资源和晋升机会。结论:这是澳大利亚最大的关于RON的研究,表明RON是一个令人满意的肿瘤学专业。这项研究的数据可以用来确定在人员配备、参与和保留RONs方面的改进机会,可能会导致澳大利亚放射肿瘤学护理国家指南的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey Study on the Roles, Responsibilities and Workforce Characteristics of Radiation Oncology Nurses in Australia

Introduction

Radiation Oncology Nurses (RONs) are key members of the radiation oncology team; however, the role of the RON is not always clear. The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the RON workforce in Australia, to describe the roles and responsibilities of RONs, and to identify challenges and job satisfaction of RONs.

Methods

This was a two-part multi-methods survey study. Two self-reported questionnaires were distributed online using purposive and snowball sampling: Radiation Oncology Facility Survey (ROFS) and RON Workforce Survey (RONWS). The surveys used tick boxes, Likert scale and open and closed-ended questions. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables; mean/standard deviation for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 42 responses were received for the ROFS and 139 for the RONWS, representing all States and Territories in Australia except the Australian Capital Territory (ACT): 52% were metropolitan and 50% were public facilities. Only 17% reported radiation oncology specific training, but 58% had plans to further their education. 80% reported being satisfied with their career and position, believing their role was recognised and generally respected among colleagues and patients. Areas of dissatisfaction included salary, staffing resources and opportunities for advancement.

Conclusion

This is the largest study of RONs in Australia, revealing that RON is a satisfying oncology specialty. Data from this study can be used to identify opportunities for improvement in staffing, engagement and retention of RONs, possibly leading to the development of national guidelines for radiation oncology nursing in Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信