艰难梭菌感染的筛查和针对性预防:STOP-CDI。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mathew J Ziegler, Judith Anesi, Pam Tolomeo, Laurel Glaser, Laura Cowden, Leigh Cressman, Elizabeth Huang, Alexa Patel, Ebbing Lautenbach, David A Pegues, Brendan J Kelly
{"title":"艰难梭菌感染的筛查和针对性预防:STOP-CDI。","authors":"Mathew J Ziegler, Judith Anesi, Pam Tolomeo, Laurel Glaser, Laura Cowden, Leigh Cressman, Elizabeth Huang, Alexa Patel, Ebbing Lautenbach, David A Pegues, Brendan J Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients receiving immunosuppression for oncology treatment and solid organ transplantation are at high risk for developing hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI). We studied the impact of a prophylactic enteral vancomycin intervention on the reduction of HO-CDI during high-risk inpatient admissions among immunocompromised patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The screening and targeted prophylaxis (STOP) intervention was implemented over a 2-year period. Patients admitted for solid organ transplant, autologous stem cell transplant, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, or treatment for leukaemia were screened for colonization with C. difficile. Colonized patients were placed in contact isolation and were advised to start anti-C.difficile antibiotic prophylaxis. To assess the effect of this intervention on both C.difficile testing and incident HO-CDI, comparison was made to historical controls in the 2 years before implementation of the STOP intervention, both unweighted and weighted by treatment category and separately by treatment category and severity of illness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2021 to December 2023, 696 patients were screened for C difficile, among whom 11.1% (77/696) were found to be colonized and received the prophylactic intervention. Compared with treatment-weighted controls, the odds of HO-CDI were significantly lower in the intervention group (6/696 [0.88%] vs. 81/1450 [5.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% Credible Interval [CrI], 0.06-0.30). Significant reductions in 90-day CDI (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.25-0.64), stool output (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.77-0.92), and length of stay (-2.5 days; 95% CrI, -3.4 to -1.5) were also observed in the intervention group. There was no detected difference in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci infection (OR, 0.77; 95% CrI, 0.33-1.75) or mortality (OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.11-1.49).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The STOP intervention was effective at reducing HO-CDI, length of stay, and symptoms of C difficile in this high-risk cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening and targeted prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile infection.\",\"authors\":\"Mathew J Ziegler, Judith Anesi, Pam Tolomeo, Laurel Glaser, Laura Cowden, Leigh Cressman, Elizabeth Huang, Alexa Patel, Ebbing Lautenbach, David A Pegues, Brendan J Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients receiving immunosuppression for oncology treatment and solid organ transplantation are at high risk for developing hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI). We studied the impact of a prophylactic enteral vancomycin intervention on the reduction of HO-CDI during high-risk inpatient admissions among immunocompromised patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The screening and targeted prophylaxis (STOP) intervention was implemented over a 2-year period. Patients admitted for solid organ transplant, autologous stem cell transplant, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, or treatment for leukaemia were screened for colonization with C. difficile. Colonized patients were placed in contact isolation and were advised to start anti-C.difficile antibiotic prophylaxis. To assess the effect of this intervention on both C.difficile testing and incident HO-CDI, comparison was made to historical controls in the 2 years before implementation of the STOP intervention, both unweighted and weighted by treatment category and separately by treatment category and severity of illness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2021 to December 2023, 696 patients were screened for C difficile, among whom 11.1% (77/696) were found to be colonized and received the prophylactic intervention. Compared with treatment-weighted controls, the odds of HO-CDI were significantly lower in the intervention group (6/696 [0.88%] vs. 81/1450 [5.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% Credible Interval [CrI], 0.06-0.30). Significant reductions in 90-day CDI (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.25-0.64), stool output (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.77-0.92), and length of stay (-2.5 days; 95% CrI, -3.4 to -1.5) were also observed in the intervention group. There was no detected difference in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci infection (OR, 0.77; 95% CrI, 0.33-1.75) or mortality (OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.11-1.49).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The STOP intervention was effective at reducing HO-CDI, length of stay, and symptoms of C difficile in this high-risk cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:因肿瘤治疗和实体器官移植而接受免疫抑制的患者发生院源性艰难梭菌感染(HO-CDI)的风险较高。我们研究了免疫功能低下的高危住院患者中预防性肠内万古霉素干预对降低HO-CDI的影响。方法:筛查和针对性预防(STOP)干预实施为期两年。接受实体器官移植、自体干细胞移植、嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)或白血病治疗的患者进行艰难梭菌定植筛查。定殖患者被隔离接触,并建议开始抗c抗体。艰难梭菌抗生素预防。为了评估该干预措施对艰难梭菌检测和HO-CDI事件的影响,与实施STOP干预前两年的历史对照进行了比较,分别按治疗类别和治疗类别和疾病严重程度进行了加权和加权。结果:在2021年11月至2023年12月期间,696例患者筛查了艰难梭菌,其中11.1%(77/696)的患者被定植并接受了预防干预。与治疗加权对照组相比,干预组HO-CDI的发生率显著降低(6/696 [0.88%]vs 81/1450[5.6%],比值比[OR] 0.15, 95%可信区间[CrI] 0.06 ~ 0.30)。干预组90天CDI (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.25 ~ 0.64)、排便量(发病率比[IRR] 0.84, 95% CrI 0.77 ~ 0.92)和住院时间(-2.5天,95% CrI -3.4 ~ -1.5)均显著降低。VRE感染(OR 0.77, 95% CrI 0.33 ~ 1.75)和死亡率(OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.11 ~ 1.49)没有检测到差异。结论:在这一高危队列中,STOP干预在降低HO-CDI、住院时间和艰难梭菌症状方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening and targeted prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile infection.

Objective: Patients receiving immunosuppression for oncology treatment and solid organ transplantation are at high risk for developing hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI). We studied the impact of a prophylactic enteral vancomycin intervention on the reduction of HO-CDI during high-risk inpatient admissions among immunocompromised patients.

Methods: The screening and targeted prophylaxis (STOP) intervention was implemented over a 2-year period. Patients admitted for solid organ transplant, autologous stem cell transplant, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, or treatment for leukaemia were screened for colonization with C. difficile. Colonized patients were placed in contact isolation and were advised to start anti-C.difficile antibiotic prophylaxis. To assess the effect of this intervention on both C.difficile testing and incident HO-CDI, comparison was made to historical controls in the 2 years before implementation of the STOP intervention, both unweighted and weighted by treatment category and separately by treatment category and severity of illness.

Results: From November 2021 to December 2023, 696 patients were screened for C difficile, among whom 11.1% (77/696) were found to be colonized and received the prophylactic intervention. Compared with treatment-weighted controls, the odds of HO-CDI were significantly lower in the intervention group (6/696 [0.88%] vs. 81/1450 [5.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% Credible Interval [CrI], 0.06-0.30). Significant reductions in 90-day CDI (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.25-0.64), stool output (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.77-0.92), and length of stay (-2.5 days; 95% CrI, -3.4 to -1.5) were also observed in the intervention group. There was no detected difference in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci infection (OR, 0.77; 95% CrI, 0.33-1.75) or mortality (OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.11-1.49).

Discussion: The STOP intervention was effective at reducing HO-CDI, length of stay, and symptoms of C difficile in this high-risk cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信