断裂结构和应力传递控制的应力非均质性:2016-2017年意大利中部地震序列

IF 4.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Patricia Martínez-Garzón, Men-Andrin Meier, Cristiano Collettini, Federica Lanza, Georg Dresen
{"title":"断裂结构和应力传递控制的应力非均质性:2016-2017年意大利中部地震序列","authors":"Patricia Martínez-Garzón,&nbsp;Men-Andrin Meier,&nbsp;Cristiano Collettini,&nbsp;Federica Lanza,&nbsp;Georg Dresen","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyze the evolution of stress parameters from the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence taking advantage of ∼13,747 robust focal mechanisms from a deep learning catalog. The density of the catalog allows us to invert focal mechanisms over distances of a few km and different time periods. We inferred a number of stress-related parameters, including the fault plane variability, the orientation of principal stress axes and maximum horizontal stress, the relative magnitudes of principal stresses and the variability of the principal stress orientations with respect to the median. From the uniform regional stress field consistent with the extension of the Apennine Belt, we observe local stress heterogeneities that are driven by the structural features and the coseismic stress history. A variation of the principal stress magnitudes and regimes from pure normal faulting toward transtension with depth is observed. Stress differences at the 1–10 km wavelength are observed between each side of two of the main regional fault structures. The reported stress results suggest a partial mechanical coupling and a strong interaction between the shallow normal faults and the detachment horizon at depth. Furthermore, distinct trends are observed in the stress parameters after the largest mainshocks, and before the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.5 Norcia mainshock, potentially indicating the high shear stress still available in well oriented faults after the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Our analysis holds implications toward (a) constraining stress magnitudes, (b) illuminating the interaction between the shallow normal faults and detachment horizons, and (c) tracking stress evolution during seismic sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Martínez-Garzón,&nbsp;Men-Andrin Meier,&nbsp;Cristiano Collettini,&nbsp;Federica Lanza,&nbsp;Georg Dresen\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We analyze the evolution of stress parameters from the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence taking advantage of ∼13,747 robust focal mechanisms from a deep learning catalog. The density of the catalog allows us to invert focal mechanisms over distances of a few km and different time periods. We inferred a number of stress-related parameters, including the fault plane variability, the orientation of principal stress axes and maximum horizontal stress, the relative magnitudes of principal stresses and the variability of the principal stress orientations with respect to the median. From the uniform regional stress field consistent with the extension of the Apennine Belt, we observe local stress heterogeneities that are driven by the structural features and the coseismic stress history. A variation of the principal stress magnitudes and regimes from pure normal faulting toward transtension with depth is observed. Stress differences at the 1–10 km wavelength are observed between each side of two of the main regional fault structures. The reported stress results suggest a partial mechanical coupling and a strong interaction between the shallow normal faults and the detachment horizon at depth. Furthermore, distinct trends are observed in the stress parameters after the largest mainshocks, and before the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.5 Norcia mainshock, potentially indicating the high shear stress still available in well oriented faults after the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Our analysis holds implications toward (a) constraining stress magnitudes, (b) illuminating the interaction between the shallow normal faults and detachment horizons, and (c) tracking stress evolution during seismic sequence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"130 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029763\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029763\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用深度学习目录中的~ 13,747个鲁棒震源机制,分析了2016-2017年意大利中部地震序列的应力参数演变。星表的密度使我们能够在几公里的距离和不同的时间段内反演震源机制。我们推断了一些与应力相关的参数,包括断平面变异性、主应力轴和最大水平应力的方向、主应力的相对大小以及主应力方向相对于中位数的变异性。从与亚平宁带伸展一致的均匀区域应力场中,观察到由构造特征和同震应力历史驱动的局部应力非均质性。观察到主应力大小和状态随深度从纯正断层向张拉的变化。在两个主要区域断层结构的每侧观测到1-10 km波长的应力差异。所报道的应力结果表明,浅层正断层与滑脱层在深部存在部分力学耦合和强相互作用。此外,在最大主震之后和mw6.5 Norcia主震之前,应力参数有明显的变化趋势,这可能表明在mw6.0 Amatrice地震之后,井向断层仍然存在高剪应力。我们的分析具有以下意义:(a)约束应力大小,(b)阐明浅层正断层和剥离层之间的相互作用,以及(c)跟踪地震序列中的应力演化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence

Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence

Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence

Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence

We analyze the evolution of stress parameters from the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence taking advantage of ∼13,747 robust focal mechanisms from a deep learning catalog. The density of the catalog allows us to invert focal mechanisms over distances of a few km and different time periods. We inferred a number of stress-related parameters, including the fault plane variability, the orientation of principal stress axes and maximum horizontal stress, the relative magnitudes of principal stresses and the variability of the principal stress orientations with respect to the median. From the uniform regional stress field consistent with the extension of the Apennine Belt, we observe local stress heterogeneities that are driven by the structural features and the coseismic stress history. A variation of the principal stress magnitudes and regimes from pure normal faulting toward transtension with depth is observed. Stress differences at the 1–10 km wavelength are observed between each side of two of the main regional fault structures. The reported stress results suggest a partial mechanical coupling and a strong interaction between the shallow normal faults and the detachment horizon at depth. Furthermore, distinct trends are observed in the stress parameters after the largest mainshocks, and before the MW 6.5 Norcia mainshock, potentially indicating the high shear stress still available in well oriented faults after the MW 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Our analysis holds implications toward (a) constraining stress magnitudes, (b) illuminating the interaction between the shallow normal faults and detachment horizons, and (c) tracking stress evolution during seismic sequence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信