Mario Brusco, Sara Trivellini, Rita Cozzali, Andrea Brusaferro, Olivia Morelli, Rachele Simonte, Giuseppe Di Cara, Francesco Valitutti
{"title":"环境对小儿乳糜泻诊断及随访的影响。","authors":"Mario Brusco, Sara Trivellini, Rita Cozzali, Andrea Brusaferro, Olivia Morelli, Rachele Simonte, Giuseppe Di Cara, Francesco Valitutti","doi":"10.1002/jpr3.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) footprint of celiac disease (CeD) diagnostic guidelines and follow-up practices for children/adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed and followed up for CeD in Umbria region during 2020-2023 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided in two groups: Group 1 included patients diagnosed by duodenal biopsies (total: 43), while Group 2 included no-biopsy patients (total: 193). Transport emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> per kilometer traveled by a diesel car was estimated as 171 g/km. CO<sub>2</sub> cost was estimated as 22 kg for each anesthesia and as 5.4 kg for each upper GI endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median CO<sub>2</sub> cost/patient/year in Group 1 was 397.9 kg, while the median CO<sub>2</sub> cost/patient/year in Group 2 was 57.2 kg (<i>p</i> < 0.001). As regards the follow-up of these children, we estimated a median CO<sub>2</sub> amount of 39.3 kg produced per year by car emission and there was no difference between the two groups (Group 1 40.5 kg vs. Group 2 38.1 kg; <i>p</i>:ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The no-biopsy approach for the CeD diagnosis strongly decreases the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Whether implementing telemedicine, handing over to primary care or reducing outpatient consultations for follow-up will be feasible and environmentally more sustainable should be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":501015,"journal":{"name":"JPGN reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"236-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environmental impact of pediatric celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Brusco, Sara Trivellini, Rita Cozzali, Andrea Brusaferro, Olivia Morelli, Rachele Simonte, Giuseppe Di Cara, Francesco Valitutti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpr3.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) footprint of celiac disease (CeD) diagnostic guidelines and follow-up practices for children/adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed and followed up for CeD in Umbria region during 2020-2023 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided in two groups: Group 1 included patients diagnosed by duodenal biopsies (total: 43), while Group 2 included no-biopsy patients (total: 193). Transport emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> per kilometer traveled by a diesel car was estimated as 171 g/km. CO<sub>2</sub> cost was estimated as 22 kg for each anesthesia and as 5.4 kg for each upper GI endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median CO<sub>2</sub> cost/patient/year in Group 1 was 397.9 kg, while the median CO<sub>2</sub> cost/patient/year in Group 2 was 57.2 kg (<i>p</i> < 0.001). As regards the follow-up of these children, we estimated a median CO<sub>2</sub> amount of 39.3 kg produced per year by car emission and there was no difference between the two groups (Group 1 40.5 kg vs. Group 2 38.1 kg; <i>p</i>:ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The no-biopsy approach for the CeD diagnosis strongly decreases the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Whether implementing telemedicine, handing over to primary care or reducing outpatient consultations for follow-up will be feasible and environmentally more sustainable should be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPGN reports\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"236-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPGN reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.70048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.70048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估儿童/青少年乳糜泻(CeD)诊断指南和随访实践的二氧化碳(CO2)足迹。方法:对2020-2023年翁布里亚地区确诊并随访的286例CeD患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组:1组为经十二指肠活检诊断的患者(共43例),2组为未行十二指肠活检诊断的患者(共193例)。据估计,柴油车每公里的二氧化碳排放量为171克/公里。每次麻醉的二氧化碳成本估计为22公斤,每次上消化道内镜检查的二氧化碳成本估计为5.4公斤。结果:第1组的CO2成本中位数/患者/年为397.9 kg,第2组的CO2成本中位数/患者/年为57.2 kg (p < 2),汽车排放的CO2排放量为39.3 kg /年,两组之间无差异(第1组为40.5 kg,第2组为38.1 kg;p: ns)。结论:无活检方法诊断CeD可显著降低CO2排放。实施远程医疗、移交给初级保健或减少门诊随访是否可行,以及在环境上是否更具可持续性,都应进行评估。
The environmental impact of pediatric celiac disease diagnosis and follow-up.
Objectives: To evaluate carbon dioxide (CO2) footprint of celiac disease (CeD) diagnostic guidelines and follow-up practices for children/adolescents.
Methods: Two-hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed and followed up for CeD in Umbria region during 2020-2023 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided in two groups: Group 1 included patients diagnosed by duodenal biopsies (total: 43), while Group 2 included no-biopsy patients (total: 193). Transport emissions of CO2 per kilometer traveled by a diesel car was estimated as 171 g/km. CO2 cost was estimated as 22 kg for each anesthesia and as 5.4 kg for each upper GI endoscopy.
Results: The median CO2 cost/patient/year in Group 1 was 397.9 kg, while the median CO2 cost/patient/year in Group 2 was 57.2 kg (p < 0.001). As regards the follow-up of these children, we estimated a median CO2 amount of 39.3 kg produced per year by car emission and there was no difference between the two groups (Group 1 40.5 kg vs. Group 2 38.1 kg; p:ns).
Conclusions: The no-biopsy approach for the CeD diagnosis strongly decreases the CO2 emissions. Whether implementing telemedicine, handing over to primary care or reducing outpatient consultations for follow-up will be feasible and environmentally more sustainable should be evaluated.