Louisa W J He, Ary Serpa Neto, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson
{"title":"持续性危重疾病的长期预后。","authors":"Louisa W J He, Ary Serpa Neto, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1044OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Persistent critical illness (PerCI) describes a growing group of intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose critical illness persist into chronicity. They account for a disproportionate amount of resources, yet long-term functional outcomes are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare death or new disability at six months in ICU patients with and without PerCI (defined as ≥10 days ICU stay).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multi-centre, prospective cohort study conducted in six metropolitan ICUs. Participants were adults admitted to ICU who received >24 hours mechanical ventilation. Patients who died before day 10 were excluded from the control group. The primary outcome was death or new disability at six months, adjusted for various covariates, with new disability defined as ≥10% increase in WHODAS 2.0. Various secondary outcomes (including quality of life, cognition, mental health, return to work) were included to assess recovery holistically at three and six months. A significance level of 0.01 was used to compensate for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 888 total enrolled patients, 799 survived to day 10. Of these, the primary outcome was available in 670 (84%) patients, 188 with PerCI and 482 in the control. The primary outcome was present in 124/171 (72.5%) of patients with PerCI and 236/457 (53.9%) of the control124/171 (72.5%) and 236/457 (53.9%) respectively (adjusted risk difference 10.70 [95% CI 0.47-20.90]; p=0.040).]). At six months, the mortality rate was higher in the PerCI group compared to control: respectively 76/252 (30.2%) and 57/547 (10.4%) (adjusted risk difference 15.04 [95% CI 9.65-20.39]; p<0.001).]). In survivors, 48/95 (50.5%) of the PerCI group developed a new disability, compared to 100/311 (32.2%) in the control (adjusted risk difference 9.98 [95% CI -0.27-20.20]; p=0.056).]). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed several differences at three months which were reduced by six months, and residual differences were largely related to physical function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with PerCI had a higher similar incidence of death or new disability at six months. However, assessment of secondary outcomes showed significant recovery in PerCI survivors between three and six months.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Louisa W J He, Ary Serpa Neto, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1044OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Persistent critical illness (PerCI) describes a growing group of intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose critical illness persist into chronicity. They account for a disproportionate amount of resources, yet long-term functional outcomes are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare death or new disability at six months in ICU patients with and without PerCI (defined as ≥10 days ICU stay).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multi-centre, prospective cohort study conducted in six metropolitan ICUs. Participants were adults admitted to ICU who received >24 hours mechanical ventilation. Patients who died before day 10 were excluded from the control group. The primary outcome was death or new disability at six months, adjusted for various covariates, with new disability defined as ≥10% increase in WHODAS 2.0. Various secondary outcomes (including quality of life, cognition, mental health, return to work) were included to assess recovery holistically at three and six months. A significance level of 0.01 was used to compensate for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 888 total enrolled patients, 799 survived to day 10. Of these, the primary outcome was available in 670 (84%) patients, 188 with PerCI and 482 in the control. The primary outcome was present in 124/171 (72.5%) of patients with PerCI and 236/457 (53.9%) of the control124/171 (72.5%) and 236/457 (53.9%) respectively (adjusted risk difference 10.70 [95% CI 0.47-20.90]; p=0.040).]). At six months, the mortality rate was higher in the PerCI group compared to control: respectively 76/252 (30.2%) and 57/547 (10.4%) (adjusted risk difference 15.04 [95% CI 9.65-20.39]; p<0.001).]). In survivors, 48/95 (50.5%) of the PerCI group developed a new disability, compared to 100/311 (32.2%) in the control (adjusted risk difference 9.98 [95% CI -0.27-20.20]; p=0.056).]). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed several differences at three months which were reduced by six months, and residual differences were largely related to physical function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with PerCI had a higher similar incidence of death or new disability at six months. However, assessment of secondary outcomes showed significant recovery in PerCI survivors between three and six months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1044OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1044OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
理由:持续性危重症(ci)描述了重症监护病房(ICU)中危重症持续发展为慢性疾病的患者群体。它们占据了不成比例的资源,但长期的功能结果是未知的。目的:比较有和无pci(定义为ICU住院≥10天)的ICU患者在6个月时的死亡或新残疾。方法:对6个城市icu进行的多中心前瞻性队列研究进行二次分析。参与者为ICU住院的成年人,接受>24小时机械通气。第10天前死亡的患者排除在对照组之外。主要结局为6个月时死亡或新失能,经各种协变量调整后,在WHODAS 2.0中,新失能定义为增加≥10%。包括各种次要结果(包括生活质量、认知、心理健康、重返工作岗位),以在3个月和6个月时全面评估恢复情况。采用0.01的显著性水平来补偿多重性。结果:888例入组患者中,799例存活至第10天。其中,670例(84%)患者获得了主要结局,其中188例为pci, 482例为对照组。主要结局分别出现在124/171(72.5%)的CI患者和236/457(53.9%)的对照组中(124/171(72.5%)和236/457(53.9%))(校正风险差10.70 [95% CI 0.47-20.90];p = 0.040)。])。6个月时,与对照组相比,CI组的死亡率更高:分别为76/252(30.2%)和57/547(10.4%)(校正风险差15.04 [95% CI 9.65-20.39];结论:ci患者在6个月时有较高的相似死亡或新发残疾发生率。然而,次要结果的评估显示,在3至6个月间,ci幸存者有显著的恢复。
Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness.
Rationale: Persistent critical illness (PerCI) describes a growing group of intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose critical illness persist into chronicity. They account for a disproportionate amount of resources, yet long-term functional outcomes are unknown.
Objectives: To compare death or new disability at six months in ICU patients with and without PerCI (defined as ≥10 days ICU stay).
Methods: Secondary analysis of a multi-centre, prospective cohort study conducted in six metropolitan ICUs. Participants were adults admitted to ICU who received >24 hours mechanical ventilation. Patients who died before day 10 were excluded from the control group. The primary outcome was death or new disability at six months, adjusted for various covariates, with new disability defined as ≥10% increase in WHODAS 2.0. Various secondary outcomes (including quality of life, cognition, mental health, return to work) were included to assess recovery holistically at three and six months. A significance level of 0.01 was used to compensate for multiplicity.
Results: Of 888 total enrolled patients, 799 survived to day 10. Of these, the primary outcome was available in 670 (84%) patients, 188 with PerCI and 482 in the control. The primary outcome was present in 124/171 (72.5%) of patients with PerCI and 236/457 (53.9%) of the control124/171 (72.5%) and 236/457 (53.9%) respectively (adjusted risk difference 10.70 [95% CI 0.47-20.90]; p=0.040).]). At six months, the mortality rate was higher in the PerCI group compared to control: respectively 76/252 (30.2%) and 57/547 (10.4%) (adjusted risk difference 15.04 [95% CI 9.65-20.39]; p<0.001).]). In survivors, 48/95 (50.5%) of the PerCI group developed a new disability, compared to 100/311 (32.2%) in the control (adjusted risk difference 9.98 [95% CI -0.27-20.20]; p=0.056).]). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed several differences at three months which were reduced by six months, and residual differences were largely related to physical function.
Conclusion: Patients with PerCI had a higher similar incidence of death or new disability at six months. However, assessment of secondary outcomes showed significant recovery in PerCI survivors between three and six months.