对控制血压的神经调节技术的范围回顾:这种方法的优缺点是什么?

Peter L Greechan, Ryan G L Koh, Paul B Yoo
{"title":"对控制血压的神经调节技术的范围回顾:这种方法的优缺点是什么?","authors":"Peter L Greechan, Ryan G L Koh, Paul B Yoo","doi":"10.1186/s42234-025-00181-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>While there has been rapid progress in research aimed at developing device-based neuromodulation therapies for blood pressure (BP) disorders, there is a paucity of FDA-approved therapies. Currently, the only approved devices for treating resistant hypertension use renal denervation, however, this could soon change as clinical research progresses. With the evolution of interventional strategies for BP regulation, it is important to comprehend the developments to date in order to gauge directions for future research. The objective of this scoping review was to provide the current range of device-based BP neuromodulation approaches, overview salient characteristics of the included studies, address limitations, and detail avenues of further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Reviews and and Meta-analysis framework. The literature search was performed across the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Pubmed databases. The search yielded 3503 studies, of which 100 studies remained following the screening process. In the last 10 years, there has been an increase in the number of experimental neurostimulation studies detailing increases and decreases in BP. Of all the included studies, most adopted a non-randomized experimental approach (89%), used animal participants (65%), used invasive neuromodulation methods (74%), and performed acute experiments (84%). More studies documented only depressor responses (49%) compared to pressor responses (35%), and 13% reported both pressor and depressor responses using multiple neural targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review addressed developments in device-based BP neuromodulation, highlighting a dominant focus on treating resistant hypertension compared to hypotensive disorders. While advancements in implantable electrodes have improved spatial selectivity of stimulation, non-invasive neurostimulation devices have become increasingly popular in recent years.</p>","PeriodicalId":72363,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectronic medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of neuromodulation techniques for controlling blood pressure: what are the ups and downs to this approach?\",\"authors\":\"Peter L Greechan, Ryan G L Koh, Paul B Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42234-025-00181-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>While there has been rapid progress in research aimed at developing device-based neuromodulation therapies for blood pressure (BP) disorders, there is a paucity of FDA-approved therapies. Currently, the only approved devices for treating resistant hypertension use renal denervation, however, this could soon change as clinical research progresses. With the evolution of interventional strategies for BP regulation, it is important to comprehend the developments to date in order to gauge directions for future research. The objective of this scoping review was to provide the current range of device-based BP neuromodulation approaches, overview salient characteristics of the included studies, address limitations, and detail avenues of further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Reviews and and Meta-analysis framework. The literature search was performed across the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Pubmed databases. The search yielded 3503 studies, of which 100 studies remained following the screening process. In the last 10 years, there has been an increase in the number of experimental neurostimulation studies detailing increases and decreases in BP. Of all the included studies, most adopted a non-randomized experimental approach (89%), used animal participants (65%), used invasive neuromodulation methods (74%), and performed acute experiments (84%). More studies documented only depressor responses (49%) compared to pressor responses (35%), and 13% reported both pressor and depressor responses using multiple neural targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review addressed developments in device-based BP neuromodulation, highlighting a dominant focus on treating resistant hypertension compared to hypotensive disorders. While advancements in implantable electrodes have improved spatial selectivity of stimulation, non-invasive neurostimulation devices have become increasingly popular in recent years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00181-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectronic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00181-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然针对血压(BP)疾病的基于装置的神经调节疗法的研究取得了快速进展,但fda批准的疗法仍很缺乏。目前,唯一被批准用于治疗顽固性高血压的设备是肾去神经,然而,随着临床研究的进展,这种情况可能很快会改变。随着BP监管干预策略的演变,了解迄今为止的发展情况对于衡量未来的研究方向至关重要。本综述的目的是提供当前基于装置的BP神经调节方法的范围,概述所纳入研究的显著特征,解决局限性,并详细介绍进一步研究的途径。方法:我们的综述使用首选报告项目和荟萃分析框架进行。文献检索是在Web of Science Core Collection、Scopus和Pubmed数据库中进行的。这项研究产生了3503项研究,其中100项研究仍在进行筛选过程。在过去的10年里,有越来越多的实验神经刺激研究详细描述了血压的升高和降低。在所有纳入的研究中,大多数采用非随机实验方法(89%),使用动物参与者(65%),使用侵入性神经调节方法(74%),并进行急性实验(84%)。更多的研究只记录了降压反应(49%),而加压反应(35%),13%的研究报告了使用多个神经靶点的降压反应和加压反应。结论:本文综述了基于装置的BP神经调节的发展,强调了与低血压疾病相比,治疗顽固性高血压的主要重点。虽然植入式电极的进步提高了刺激的空间选择性,但非侵入性神经刺激装置近年来越来越受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of neuromodulation techniques for controlling blood pressure: what are the ups and downs to this approach?

Background and objectives: While there has been rapid progress in research aimed at developing device-based neuromodulation therapies for blood pressure (BP) disorders, there is a paucity of FDA-approved therapies. Currently, the only approved devices for treating resistant hypertension use renal denervation, however, this could soon change as clinical research progresses. With the evolution of interventional strategies for BP regulation, it is important to comprehend the developments to date in order to gauge directions for future research. The objective of this scoping review was to provide the current range of device-based BP neuromodulation approaches, overview salient characteristics of the included studies, address limitations, and detail avenues of further investigation.

Methods: Our review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Reviews and and Meta-analysis framework. The literature search was performed across the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Pubmed databases. The search yielded 3503 studies, of which 100 studies remained following the screening process. In the last 10 years, there has been an increase in the number of experimental neurostimulation studies detailing increases and decreases in BP. Of all the included studies, most adopted a non-randomized experimental approach (89%), used animal participants (65%), used invasive neuromodulation methods (74%), and performed acute experiments (84%). More studies documented only depressor responses (49%) compared to pressor responses (35%), and 13% reported both pressor and depressor responses using multiple neural targets.

Conclusions: This review addressed developments in device-based BP neuromodulation, highlighting a dominant focus on treating resistant hypertension compared to hypotensive disorders. While advancements in implantable electrodes have improved spatial selectivity of stimulation, non-invasive neurostimulation devices have become increasingly popular in recent years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信