评估脑瘫儿童认知能力的注意事项。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lena Elin Lorentzen, Sandra Julsen Hollung, Kristine Stadskleiv
{"title":"评估脑瘫儿童认知能力的注意事项。","authors":"Lena Elin Lorentzen, Sandra Julsen Hollung, Kristine Stadskleiv","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2547010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To describe cognitive assessment results in relation to clinical characteristics in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to compare methods for calculating composite scores, taking their motor impairments into account. <b>Method:</b> All children registered in the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy born 2002-2014 were included. The contribution of clinical characteristics per assessment results were investigated using one-way ANOVA (eta-squared (<i>η<sup>2</sup></i>) effect size) and multiple linear regression analyzes. Composite scores were compared with paired samples t-test (Cohen's <i>d</i> effect size). <b>Results:</b> Of the 1532 children with CP registered, 972 (63.4%) had a cognitive assessment. An Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score was available for 451 (46.4%) of the assessed children (range 40 - 129, mean 82.3). Twenty-two percent had an intellectual disability. Mean IQ was lowest in children with spastic quadriplegic CP, epilepsy, and/or severe hearing impairment (effect sizes were small, <i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.05, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The Verbal Comprehension Index score was highest and Visual Spatial Index lowest, with moderate effect size, <i>d</i> = 0.7. Fine motor skills and speech ability contributed most towards explaining variability in Wechsler Full Scale IQ (FSIQ). General Ability Index, Fluid Reasoning Index and Nonmotor Full Scale Score were higher than FSIQ, with small to moderate effect sizes of <i>d</i> = 0.61, 0.46 and 0.62, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Variability in cognitive functioning underscores the importance of individual assessments. Better scores were obtained on composite measures using subtests that did not place high demands on fine motor skills, indicating a need for tailoring assessment practice to children with CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations when assessing cognition in children with cerebral palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Elin Lorentzen, Sandra Julsen Hollung, Kristine Stadskleiv\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2547010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To describe cognitive assessment results in relation to clinical characteristics in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to compare methods for calculating composite scores, taking their motor impairments into account. <b>Method:</b> All children registered in the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy born 2002-2014 were included. The contribution of clinical characteristics per assessment results were investigated using one-way ANOVA (eta-squared (<i>η<sup>2</sup></i>) effect size) and multiple linear regression analyzes. Composite scores were compared with paired samples t-test (Cohen's <i>d</i> effect size). <b>Results:</b> Of the 1532 children with CP registered, 972 (63.4%) had a cognitive assessment. An Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score was available for 451 (46.4%) of the assessed children (range 40 - 129, mean 82.3). Twenty-two percent had an intellectual disability. Mean IQ was lowest in children with spastic quadriplegic CP, epilepsy, and/or severe hearing impairment (effect sizes were small, <i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.05, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The Verbal Comprehension Index score was highest and Visual Spatial Index lowest, with moderate effect size, <i>d</i> = 0.7. Fine motor skills and speech ability contributed most towards explaining variability in Wechsler Full Scale IQ (FSIQ). General Ability Index, Fluid Reasoning Index and Nonmotor Full Scale Score were higher than FSIQ, with small to moderate effect sizes of <i>d</i> = 0.61, 0.46 and 0.62, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Variability in cognitive functioning underscores the importance of individual assessments. Better scores were obtained on composite measures using subtests that did not place high demands on fine motor skills, indicating a need for tailoring assessment practice to children with CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2547010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2547010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述脑瘫(CP)患儿的认知评估结果与临床特征的关系,并比较考虑其运动障碍的综合评分计算方法。方法:纳入2002-2014年出生的所有在挪威脑瘫质量和监测登记处登记的儿童。临床特征对评估结果的贡献采用单因素方差分析(meta -squared (η2)效应大小)和多元线性回归分析。综合得分采用配对样本t检验(Cohen’s d效应量)进行比较。结果:1532例CP患儿中,972例(63.4%)有认知能力评估。451名(46.4%)儿童获得了智商(IQ)分数(范围40 - 129,平均82.3)。22%的人有智力障碍。痉挛性四肢瘫痪性脑瘫、癫痫和/或严重听力障碍患儿的平均智商最低(效应值较小,η2分别= 0.05、0.05和0.01)。言语理解指数得分最高,视觉空间指数得分最低,具有中等效应量,d = 0.7。精细运动技能和语言能力对解释韦氏全量表智商(FSIQ)的变异贡献最大。一般能力指数、流体推理指数和非运动全量表评分高于FSIQ,小到中等的效应量d分别为0.61、0.46和0.62。结论:认知功能的可变性强调了个体评估的重要性。在使用对精细运动技能要求不高的子测试的综合测量中获得了更好的分数,这表明需要为患有CP的儿童量身定制评估实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations when assessing cognition in children with cerebral palsy.

Objective: To describe cognitive assessment results in relation to clinical characteristics in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to compare methods for calculating composite scores, taking their motor impairments into account. Method: All children registered in the Norwegian Quality and Surveillance Registry for Cerebral Palsy born 2002-2014 were included. The contribution of clinical characteristics per assessment results were investigated using one-way ANOVA (eta-squared (η2) effect size) and multiple linear regression analyzes. Composite scores were compared with paired samples t-test (Cohen's d effect size). Results: Of the 1532 children with CP registered, 972 (63.4%) had a cognitive assessment. An Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score was available for 451 (46.4%) of the assessed children (range 40 - 129, mean 82.3). Twenty-two percent had an intellectual disability. Mean IQ was lowest in children with spastic quadriplegic CP, epilepsy, and/or severe hearing impairment (effect sizes were small, η2 = 0.05, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The Verbal Comprehension Index score was highest and Visual Spatial Index lowest, with moderate effect size, d = 0.7. Fine motor skills and speech ability contributed most towards explaining variability in Wechsler Full Scale IQ (FSIQ). General Ability Index, Fluid Reasoning Index and Nonmotor Full Scale Score were higher than FSIQ, with small to moderate effect sizes of d = 0.61, 0.46 and 0.62, respectively. Conclusions: Variability in cognitive functioning underscores the importance of individual assessments. Better scores were obtained on composite measures using subtests that did not place high demands on fine motor skills, indicating a need for tailoring assessment practice to children with CP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信