大运动功能测量在非脑瘫儿童中的应用:一项系统综述。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hirokazu Abe, Shuhei Higashi, Nobuaki Himuro
{"title":"大运动功能测量在非脑瘫儿童中的应用:一项系统综述。","authors":"Hirokazu Abe, Shuhei Higashi, Nobuaki Himuro","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the application and evaluate the measurement properties of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) in children with conditions other than cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases to identify studies that used the GMFM in children with conditions other than CP. Methodological quality and measurement properties were evaluated using established standards for assessing outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 210 studies across various paediatric conditions. Measurement property studies examined eight conditions: acquired brain injury, spinal muscular atrophy, Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy, Down syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), leukodystrophy, and Pompe disease. Evidence quality was generally low to very low owing to small sample sizes and methodological limitations. Reliability showed sufficient ratings across most conditions. Content validity was examined only for ALL and demonstrated sufficient ratings. Responsiveness and construct validity showed variable results across conditions. Clinical application analysis revealed inadequate methodological reporting and widespread use without appropriate validation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>GMFM validation for conditions other than CP remains insufficient despite widespread use. Content validity verification and enhanced methodological rigor are critically needed. Clinicians should interpret results cautiously until robust validation is established.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure in children with conditions other than cerebral palsy: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Hirokazu Abe, Shuhei Higashi, Nobuaki Himuro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmcn.16465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the application and evaluate the measurement properties of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) in children with conditions other than cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases to identify studies that used the GMFM in children with conditions other than CP. Methodological quality and measurement properties were evaluated using established standards for assessing outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 210 studies across various paediatric conditions. Measurement property studies examined eight conditions: acquired brain injury, spinal muscular atrophy, Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy, Down syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), leukodystrophy, and Pompe disease. Evidence quality was generally low to very low owing to small sample sizes and methodological limitations. Reliability showed sufficient ratings across most conditions. Content validity was examined only for ALL and demonstrated sufficient ratings. Responsiveness and construct validity showed variable results across conditions. Clinical application analysis revealed inadequate methodological reporting and widespread use without appropriate validation.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>GMFM validation for conditions other than CP remains insufficient despite widespread use. Content validity verification and enhanced methodological rigor are critically needed. Clinicians should interpret results cautiously until robust validation is established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨大运动功能量表(GMFM)在非脑瘫(CP)患儿中的应用及测量特性。方法:使用5个电子数据库进行系统回顾,以确定在CP以外的儿童中使用GMFM的研究。使用既定的评估结果测量标准评估方法质量和测量特性。结果:我们确定了210项涉及各种儿科疾病的研究。测量性质研究检查了八种情况:后天性脑损伤、脊髓性肌萎缩、福山先天性肌营养不良、唐氏综合征、成骨不全、急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)、脑白质营养不良和庞贝病。由于样本量小和方法上的限制,证据质量一般较低至极低。在大多数情况下,可靠性显示了足够的评级。内容效度仅对ALL进行了检查,并证明了足够的评级。反应性和结构效度在不同条件下显示不同的结果。临床应用分析显示方法学报告不足,未经适当验证而广泛使用。解释:尽管GMFM被广泛使用,但对CP以外条件的验证仍然不足。内容有效性验证和增强方法严谨性是迫切需要的。临床医生应谨慎解释结果,直到建立可靠的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure in children with conditions other than cerebral palsy: A systematic review.

Aim: To investigate the application and evaluate the measurement properties of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) in children with conditions other than cerebral palsy (CP).

Method: A systematic review was conducted using five electronic databases to identify studies that used the GMFM in children with conditions other than CP. Methodological quality and measurement properties were evaluated using established standards for assessing outcome measures.

Results: We identified 210 studies across various paediatric conditions. Measurement property studies examined eight conditions: acquired brain injury, spinal muscular atrophy, Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy, Down syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), leukodystrophy, and Pompe disease. Evidence quality was generally low to very low owing to small sample sizes and methodological limitations. Reliability showed sufficient ratings across most conditions. Content validity was examined only for ALL and demonstrated sufficient ratings. Responsiveness and construct validity showed variable results across conditions. Clinical application analysis revealed inadequate methodological reporting and widespread use without appropriate validation.

Interpretation: GMFM validation for conditions other than CP remains insufficient despite widespread use. Content validity verification and enhanced methodological rigor are critically needed. Clinicians should interpret results cautiously until robust validation is established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信