居住在英国的成年人的社区粮食不安全干预措施:范围审查。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jo Smith, Philip Hodgson, Claire Williams, Amelia A Lake, Scott B Teasdale, Emma L Giles
{"title":"居住在英国的成年人的社区粮食不安全干预措施:范围审查。","authors":"Jo Smith, Philip Hodgson, Claire Williams, Amelia A Lake, Scott B Teasdale, Emma L Giles","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food insecurity is a growing concern worldwide, particularly in the United Kingdom. Despite this, community-based interventions to address food insecurity remain an under-researched area. Existing food insecurity reviews have focused on international evidence, limiting investigations to foodbank use and/or interventions targeted towards children. This scoping review aimed to understand the evidence on available community-based interventions for adults experiencing food insecurity in the United Kingdom and the suggested elements for a feasible, acceptable intervention. A comprehensive electronic search was completed up to January 2024. All study designs were considered. A descriptive analytical approach was used to summarise intervention data. Narrative synthesis explored the data further, using the Food Ladders model as a framework. This review identified a very limited scope and quantity of evidence on community food insecurity interventions for UK adults, with 21 included studies. Over half of interventions (52.4%, n = 11) relied on volunteers, and a high proportion used donated or surplus food. The nutritional quality of emergency food provision was poor, and it was unclear whether providers could adequately cater for special dietary requirements, cultural and/or religious needs. There were very few studies (19.0%, n = 4) assessing the feasibility or acceptability of interventions or their impact on food insecurity. Further research is required into the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of community food insecurity interventions for adults in the United Kingdom.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Food Insecurity Interventions for Adults Living in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jo Smith, Philip Hodgson, Claire Williams, Amelia A Lake, Scott B Teasdale, Emma L Giles\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nbu.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Food insecurity is a growing concern worldwide, particularly in the United Kingdom. Despite this, community-based interventions to address food insecurity remain an under-researched area. Existing food insecurity reviews have focused on international evidence, limiting investigations to foodbank use and/or interventions targeted towards children. This scoping review aimed to understand the evidence on available community-based interventions for adults experiencing food insecurity in the United Kingdom and the suggested elements for a feasible, acceptable intervention. A comprehensive electronic search was completed up to January 2024. All study designs were considered. A descriptive analytical approach was used to summarise intervention data. Narrative synthesis explored the data further, using the Food Ladders model as a framework. This review identified a very limited scope and quantity of evidence on community food insecurity interventions for UK adults, with 21 included studies. Over half of interventions (52.4%, n = 11) relied on volunteers, and a high proportion used donated or surplus food. The nutritional quality of emergency food provision was poor, and it was unclear whether providers could adequately cater for special dietary requirements, cultural and/or religious needs. There were very few studies (19.0%, n = 4) assessing the feasibility or acceptability of interventions or their impact on food insecurity. Further research is required into the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of community food insecurity interventions for adults in the United Kingdom.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粮食不安全是全世界日益关注的问题,特别是在英国。尽管如此,以社区为基础的解决粮食不安全问题的干预措施仍然是一个研究不足的领域。现有的粮食不安全审查侧重于国际证据,限制了对食品库使用情况和/或针对儿童的干预措施的调查。这项范围审查的目的是了解针对英国经历粮食不安全的成年人的现有社区干预措施的证据,以及可行的、可接受的干预措施的建议要素。到2024年1月,完成了全面的电子搜索。所有的研究设计都被考虑在内。采用描述性分析方法总结干预数据。叙事性综合使用“食物阶梯”模型作为框架,进一步探索了数据。本综述确定了英国成年人社区食品不安全干预措施的证据范围和数量非常有限,其中包括21项研究。超过一半的干预(52.4%,n = 11)依赖于志愿者,并且很大比例使用捐赠或剩余的食物。紧急食品供应的营养质量很差,不清楚提供者是否能够充分满足特殊的饮食要求、文化和/或宗教需要。很少有研究(19.0%,n = 4)评估干预措施的可行性或可接受性或其对粮食不安全的影响。需要进一步研究英国成人社区粮食不安全干预措施的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community Food Insecurity Interventions for Adults Living in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review.

Food insecurity is a growing concern worldwide, particularly in the United Kingdom. Despite this, community-based interventions to address food insecurity remain an under-researched area. Existing food insecurity reviews have focused on international evidence, limiting investigations to foodbank use and/or interventions targeted towards children. This scoping review aimed to understand the evidence on available community-based interventions for adults experiencing food insecurity in the United Kingdom and the suggested elements for a feasible, acceptable intervention. A comprehensive electronic search was completed up to January 2024. All study designs were considered. A descriptive analytical approach was used to summarise intervention data. Narrative synthesis explored the data further, using the Food Ladders model as a framework. This review identified a very limited scope and quantity of evidence on community food insecurity interventions for UK adults, with 21 included studies. Over half of interventions (52.4%, n = 11) relied on volunteers, and a high proportion used donated or surplus food. The nutritional quality of emergency food provision was poor, and it was unclear whether providers could adequately cater for special dietary requirements, cultural and/or religious needs. There were very few studies (19.0%, n = 4) assessing the feasibility or acceptability of interventions or their impact on food insecurity. Further research is required into the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of community food insecurity interventions for adults in the United Kingdom.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信