Kate Coneys, Julia Toomey, Bree C S Parish, Kylie Toomey, Josephine Ariadna Schwalbe, Kun Wang, D Nicholas Top, Martin Kivlighan, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Melanie M Wilcox, Peter Sanders, Russell J Bailey
{"title":"随着经验的积累,治疗师是否在文化上变得更加谦逊?有些谦逊是必要的。","authors":"Kate Coneys, Julia Toomey, Bree C S Parish, Kylie Toomey, Josephine Ariadna Schwalbe, Kun Wang, D Nicholas Top, Martin Kivlighan, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Melanie M Wilcox, Peter Sanders, Russell J Bailey","doi":"10.1037/cou0000817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has indicated that clients' perceptions of their therapist's cultural humility are important factors in positive treatment outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research examining whether therapists become more culturally humble over time. In this study, we advance this area of literature by testing whether therapists' cultural humility increases with more clinical experience using data from 1,640 clients seen by 21 therapists in a university counseling center over a 4-year time period. Clients rated their therapist's cultural humility starting at the third session and every four sessions after that. Two-level multilevel models (clients nested within therapists) were used to examine the relationship between therapist experience and client pre-post effect size (Cohen's <i>d</i>), average, and baseline cultural humility ratings. Experience was examined both as chronological time and cumulative clients seen. Results indicated that clients' initial and average ratings of their therapist's cultural humility significantly decreased over time as a function of chronological time and cumulative cases, albeit these effects were small. By contrast, therapists' client pre-post changes in cultural humility did not significantly change over time. Last, the relationship between client average, baseline, and pre-post change in cultural humility did not significantly vary between therapists. Implications for training and clinical practice as well as future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"517-522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do therapists become more culturally humble with experience? Some humility is warranted.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Coneys, Julia Toomey, Bree C S Parish, Kylie Toomey, Josephine Ariadna Schwalbe, Kun Wang, D Nicholas Top, Martin Kivlighan, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Melanie M Wilcox, Peter Sanders, Russell J Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has indicated that clients' perceptions of their therapist's cultural humility are important factors in positive treatment outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research examining whether therapists become more culturally humble over time. In this study, we advance this area of literature by testing whether therapists' cultural humility increases with more clinical experience using data from 1,640 clients seen by 21 therapists in a university counseling center over a 4-year time period. Clients rated their therapist's cultural humility starting at the third session and every four sessions after that. Two-level multilevel models (clients nested within therapists) were used to examine the relationship between therapist experience and client pre-post effect size (Cohen's <i>d</i>), average, and baseline cultural humility ratings. Experience was examined both as chronological time and cumulative clients seen. Results indicated that clients' initial and average ratings of their therapist's cultural humility significantly decreased over time as a function of chronological time and cumulative cases, albeit these effects were small. By contrast, therapists' client pre-post changes in cultural humility did not significantly change over time. Last, the relationship between client average, baseline, and pre-post change in cultural humility did not significantly vary between therapists. Implications for training and clinical practice as well as future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"517-522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000817\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究表明,来访者对治疗师文化谦逊的看法是积极治疗结果的重要因素。然而,关于治疗师是否随着时间的推移在文化上变得更加谦逊的研究却很少。在这项研究中,我们通过测试治疗师的文化谦逊是否随着临床经验的增加而增加,从而推进了这一领域的文献,使用了来自大学咨询中心21名治疗师在4年时间内观察的1640名客户的数据。来访者从第三次疗程开始对治疗师的文化谦逊度进行评估,之后每四次评估一次。使用两级多层模型(来访者嵌套在治疗师中)来检查治疗师经验与来访者前后效应大小(Cohen’s d)、平均和基线文化谦逊评分之间的关系。经验被检查为时间顺序和累积客户看到。结果表明,来访者对治疗师文化谦逊的初始和平均评分随着时间的推移显著下降,作为时间顺序和累积病例的函数,尽管这些影响很小。相比之下,治疗师的来访者在文化谦逊方面的前后变化并没有随着时间的推移而显著改变。最后,在治疗师之间,来访者平均水平、基线和文化谦逊的前后变化之间的关系没有显著差异。对培训和临床实践以及未来研究的意义进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Do therapists become more culturally humble with experience? Some humility is warranted.
Research has indicated that clients' perceptions of their therapist's cultural humility are important factors in positive treatment outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research examining whether therapists become more culturally humble over time. In this study, we advance this area of literature by testing whether therapists' cultural humility increases with more clinical experience using data from 1,640 clients seen by 21 therapists in a university counseling center over a 4-year time period. Clients rated their therapist's cultural humility starting at the third session and every four sessions after that. Two-level multilevel models (clients nested within therapists) were used to examine the relationship between therapist experience and client pre-post effect size (Cohen's d), average, and baseline cultural humility ratings. Experience was examined both as chronological time and cumulative clients seen. Results indicated that clients' initial and average ratings of their therapist's cultural humility significantly decreased over time as a function of chronological time and cumulative cases, albeit these effects were small. By contrast, therapists' client pre-post changes in cultural humility did not significantly change over time. Last, the relationship between client average, baseline, and pre-post change in cultural humility did not significantly vary between therapists. Implications for training and clinical practice as well as future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.