L S Hiemcke-Jiwa, R van Ewijk, M M van Noesel, B B J Tops, S A Koppes, S F K Lubeek, G N Jonges, A J Witkamp, A von Deimling, A H G Cleven, L A Kester, U Flucke
{"title":"gli1 /2改变的间充质肿瘤:8例扩大临床病理和分子谱的研究,包括上游ptch1失活突变。","authors":"L S Hiemcke-Jiwa, R van Ewijk, M M van Noesel, B B J Tops, S A Koppes, S F K Lubeek, G N Jonges, A J Witkamp, A von Deimling, A H G Cleven, L A Kester, U Flucke","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04211-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>GLI1/2 alterations drive mesenchymal tumors harboring rearrangements and amplifications. Affected patients show a broad age range and tumor distribution, and histology varies. We describe the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of eight cases (7 females, 1 male, age range 15-82 years). Tumors were located in the ovary (n = 3), endometrium (n = 1), retroperitoneum (n = 1), skin (n = 1), neck (n = 1), and hypopharynx (n = 1). The cases showed epithelioid (n = 2), spindle cell (n = 1), biphasic (n = 1), or round cell (n = 3) morphology. Two of the latter neoplasms had a prominent myxoid stroma. One tumor was polymorphic with brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated variable positivity for S100, pankeratin AE1/3, EMA, CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin. MDM2, CDK4, and STAT6 expressions were detected in cases with GLI1 amplification. In three neoplasms, a fusion gene was identified (GLI1::MALAT1, n = 2; PTBP1::GLI2, n = 1). Three cases harbored GLI1-amplification, with co-amplification of MDM2/CDK4 in two of them. GLI2 was amplified in one tumor. Another case had an inactivating PTCH1 mutation. By RNA expression and DNA methylation profiling, the cases formed a cluster. GLI-amplified tumors occurred in older patients (n = 3) who died within 3-27 months. GLI-fusion genes and the PTCH1 mutation were identified in neoplasms of younger patients (n = 3) remaining disease-free (25-31 months). In conclusion, our GLI1/2 altered mesenchymal tumors, clustered at RNA level and epigenetically, confirming that they form one entity, including neoplasms with PTCH1 mutations. Amplified tumors occurred in older patients and behaved more aggressively, in contrast to lesions with a fusion gene originating in younger patients and showing a favorable outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GLI1/2-altered mesenchymal tumors: a study of 8 cases expanding the clinicopathological and molecular spectrum including an upstream PTCH1-inactivating mutation.\",\"authors\":\"L S Hiemcke-Jiwa, R van Ewijk, M M van Noesel, B B J Tops, S A Koppes, S F K Lubeek, G N Jonges, A J Witkamp, A von Deimling, A H G Cleven, L A Kester, U Flucke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-025-04211-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>GLI1/2 alterations drive mesenchymal tumors harboring rearrangements and amplifications. Affected patients show a broad age range and tumor distribution, and histology varies. We describe the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of eight cases (7 females, 1 male, age range 15-82 years). Tumors were located in the ovary (n = 3), endometrium (n = 1), retroperitoneum (n = 1), skin (n = 1), neck (n = 1), and hypopharynx (n = 1). The cases showed epithelioid (n = 2), spindle cell (n = 1), biphasic (n = 1), or round cell (n = 3) morphology. Two of the latter neoplasms had a prominent myxoid stroma. One tumor was polymorphic with brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated variable positivity for S100, pankeratin AE1/3, EMA, CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin. MDM2, CDK4, and STAT6 expressions were detected in cases with GLI1 amplification. In three neoplasms, a fusion gene was identified (GLI1::MALAT1, n = 2; PTBP1::GLI2, n = 1). Three cases harbored GLI1-amplification, with co-amplification of MDM2/CDK4 in two of them. GLI2 was amplified in one tumor. Another case had an inactivating PTCH1 mutation. By RNA expression and DNA methylation profiling, the cases formed a cluster. GLI-amplified tumors occurred in older patients (n = 3) who died within 3-27 months. GLI-fusion genes and the PTCH1 mutation were identified in neoplasms of younger patients (n = 3) remaining disease-free (25-31 months). In conclusion, our GLI1/2 altered mesenchymal tumors, clustered at RNA level and epigenetically, confirming that they form one entity, including neoplasms with PTCH1 mutations. Amplified tumors occurred in older patients and behaved more aggressively, in contrast to lesions with a fusion gene originating in younger patients and showing a favorable outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04211-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04211-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
GLI1/2-altered mesenchymal tumors: a study of 8 cases expanding the clinicopathological and molecular spectrum including an upstream PTCH1-inactivating mutation.
GLI1/2 alterations drive mesenchymal tumors harboring rearrangements and amplifications. Affected patients show a broad age range and tumor distribution, and histology varies. We describe the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of eight cases (7 females, 1 male, age range 15-82 years). Tumors were located in the ovary (n = 3), endometrium (n = 1), retroperitoneum (n = 1), skin (n = 1), neck (n = 1), and hypopharynx (n = 1). The cases showed epithelioid (n = 2), spindle cell (n = 1), biphasic (n = 1), or round cell (n = 3) morphology. Two of the latter neoplasms had a prominent myxoid stroma. One tumor was polymorphic with brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated variable positivity for S100, pankeratin AE1/3, EMA, CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin. MDM2, CDK4, and STAT6 expressions were detected in cases with GLI1 amplification. In three neoplasms, a fusion gene was identified (GLI1::MALAT1, n = 2; PTBP1::GLI2, n = 1). Three cases harbored GLI1-amplification, with co-amplification of MDM2/CDK4 in two of them. GLI2 was amplified in one tumor. Another case had an inactivating PTCH1 mutation. By RNA expression and DNA methylation profiling, the cases formed a cluster. GLI-amplified tumors occurred in older patients (n = 3) who died within 3-27 months. GLI-fusion genes and the PTCH1 mutation were identified in neoplasms of younger patients (n = 3) remaining disease-free (25-31 months). In conclusion, our GLI1/2 altered mesenchymal tumors, clustered at RNA level and epigenetically, confirming that they form one entity, including neoplasms with PTCH1 mutations. Amplified tumors occurred in older patients and behaved more aggressively, in contrast to lesions with a fusion gene originating in younger patients and showing a favorable outcome.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.