区分B-SNIP精神病生物型的生物标志物特征和家族性特征。

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
David A Parker, Rebekah L Trotti, Jennifer E McDowell, Sarah K Keedy, Matcheri S Keshavan, Godfrey D Pearlson, Elliot S Gershon, Elena I Ivleva, Ling-Yu Huang, Kodiak Sauer, S Kristian Hill, John A Sweeney, Carol A Tamminga, Brett A Clementz
{"title":"区分B-SNIP精神病生物型的生物标志物特征和家族性特征。","authors":"David A Parker, Rebekah L Trotti, Jennifer E McDowell, Sarah K Keedy, Matcheri S Keshavan, Godfrey D Pearlson, Elliot S Gershon, Elena I Ivleva, Ling-Yu Huang, Kodiak Sauer, S Kristian Hill, John A Sweeney, Carol A Tamminga, Brett A Clementz","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03501-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idiopathic psychosis shows considerable biological heterogeneity across cases. The Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) used psychosis-relevant biomarkers to identify psychosis Biotypes, which will aid etiological and targeted treatment investigations. Here, our previous approach (Clementz et al. 2022) is updated, which supports the development of an efficient psychosis Biotype diagnostic procedure called ADEPT. Psychosis probands (n = 1907), their first-degree biological relatives (n = 705), and healthy participants (n = 895) completed a biomarker battery composed of cognitive performance, saccades, and auditory EEG/ERP measurements. EEG and ERP quantifications were modified from previous Biotypes iterations. Multivariate integration using multiple approaches reduced biomarker outcomes to 11 \"bio-factors.\" Twenty-four different approaches indicated bio-factor data among probands were best described by three subgroups. Numerical taxonomy with k-means clustering yielded psychosis Biotypes; Rand Indices evaluated individual-case consistency of Biotype assignments. Psychosis subgroups, their non-psychotic first-degree relatives, and healthy individuals were compared across bio-factors. The three psychosis Biotypes differed significantly on all 11 bio-factors, especially prominent for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitude, and intrinsic neural activity. Rand Indices showed excellent individual-case consistency of Biotype membership when samples included more than 1000 subjects. Canonical discriminant analysis described composite bio-factors that simplified group comparisons: \"Pattern-2\" (high antisaccade errors, low BACS, high ongoing EEG) captured Biotype-2, \"Pattern-1\" (low ERP amplitudes, low intrinsic EEG) captured Biotype-1, and \"Pattern-3\" (low frontal P3 complex, accentuated S2 ERP, faster saccadic reaction times) captured Biotype-3. First-degree relatives had patterns like their proband for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitudes, and intrinsic brain activity. These outcomes refine and extend operations for characterizing biologically distinct psychosis Biotypes. They also show that over 1000 observations are useful for achieving consistent individual-case diagnostic assignments. First-degree relative data implicate specific bio-factors as familial within idiopathic psychosis which may inform genetic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.\",\"authors\":\"David A Parker, Rebekah L Trotti, Jennifer E McDowell, Sarah K Keedy, Matcheri S Keshavan, Godfrey D Pearlson, Elliot S Gershon, Elena I Ivleva, Ling-Yu Huang, Kodiak Sauer, S Kristian Hill, John A Sweeney, Carol A Tamminga, Brett A Clementz\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41398-025-03501-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Idiopathic psychosis shows considerable biological heterogeneity across cases. The Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) used psychosis-relevant biomarkers to identify psychosis Biotypes, which will aid etiological and targeted treatment investigations. Here, our previous approach (Clementz et al. 2022) is updated, which supports the development of an efficient psychosis Biotype diagnostic procedure called ADEPT. Psychosis probands (n = 1907), their first-degree biological relatives (n = 705), and healthy participants (n = 895) completed a biomarker battery composed of cognitive performance, saccades, and auditory EEG/ERP measurements. EEG and ERP quantifications were modified from previous Biotypes iterations. Multivariate integration using multiple approaches reduced biomarker outcomes to 11 \\\"bio-factors.\\\" Twenty-four different approaches indicated bio-factor data among probands were best described by three subgroups. Numerical taxonomy with k-means clustering yielded psychosis Biotypes; Rand Indices evaluated individual-case consistency of Biotype assignments. Psychosis subgroups, their non-psychotic first-degree relatives, and healthy individuals were compared across bio-factors. The three psychosis Biotypes differed significantly on all 11 bio-factors, especially prominent for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitude, and intrinsic neural activity. Rand Indices showed excellent individual-case consistency of Biotype membership when samples included more than 1000 subjects. Canonical discriminant analysis described composite bio-factors that simplified group comparisons: \\\"Pattern-2\\\" (high antisaccade errors, low BACS, high ongoing EEG) captured Biotype-2, \\\"Pattern-1\\\" (low ERP amplitudes, low intrinsic EEG) captured Biotype-1, and \\\"Pattern-3\\\" (low frontal P3 complex, accentuated S2 ERP, faster saccadic reaction times) captured Biotype-3. First-degree relatives had patterns like their proband for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitudes, and intrinsic brain activity. These outcomes refine and extend operations for characterizing biologically distinct psychosis Biotypes. They also show that over 1000 observations are useful for achieving consistent individual-case diagnostic assignments. First-degree relative data implicate specific bio-factors as familial within idiopathic psychosis which may inform genetic studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03501-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03501-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特发性精神病在不同病例中显示出相当大的生物学异质性。双相精神分裂症中间表型网络(B-SNIP)使用精神病相关生物标志物来识别精神病生物型,这将有助于病因学和靶向治疗研究。在这里,我们更新了之前的方法(Clementz et al. 2022),这支持了一种称为ADEPT的高效精神病生物型诊断程序的发展。精神病先证者(n = 1907)、他们的一级生物学亲属(n = 705)和健康参与者(n = 895)完成了由认知表现、扫视和听觉EEG/ERP测量组成的生物标志物测试。脑电图和ERP的定量与之前的生物类型迭代相比有所改进。使用多种方法进行多元整合,将生物标志物结果减少到11个“生物因子”。24种不同的方法表明,先证者的生物因子数据最好由三个亚组描述。采用k-均值聚类的数值分类法产生精神病生物型;Rand指数评估了生物型分配的个例一致性。精神病亚组、他们的非精神病一级亲属和健康个体在生物因素方面进行比较。三种精神病生物型在所有11个生物因子上均存在显著差异,特别是在一般认知、抗扫视、ERP大小和内在神经活动方面。当样本包含超过1000个受试者时,Rand指数显示了出色的生物型隶属度的个案一致性。典型判别分析描述了简化组间比较的复合生物因素:“模式-2”(高反扫视误差,低BACS,高持续EEG)捕获生物型2,“模式-1”(低ERP振幅,低本征EEG)捕获生物型1,“模式-3”(低额P3复核,强化S2 ERP,更快的扫视反应时间)捕获生物型3。一级亲属在一般认知、反扫视、ERP大小和内在大脑活动方面的模式与先证者相似。这些结果完善和扩展了表征生物学上不同的精神病生物型的操作。他们还表明,超过1000个观察值对于实现一致的个案诊断分配是有用的。一级相关数据暗示了特发性精神病中家族性的特定生物因素,这可能为遗传学研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiating biomarker features and familial characteristics of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes.

Idiopathic psychosis shows considerable biological heterogeneity across cases. The Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) used psychosis-relevant biomarkers to identify psychosis Biotypes, which will aid etiological and targeted treatment investigations. Here, our previous approach (Clementz et al. 2022) is updated, which supports the development of an efficient psychosis Biotype diagnostic procedure called ADEPT. Psychosis probands (n = 1907), their first-degree biological relatives (n = 705), and healthy participants (n = 895) completed a biomarker battery composed of cognitive performance, saccades, and auditory EEG/ERP measurements. EEG and ERP quantifications were modified from previous Biotypes iterations. Multivariate integration using multiple approaches reduced biomarker outcomes to 11 "bio-factors." Twenty-four different approaches indicated bio-factor data among probands were best described by three subgroups. Numerical taxonomy with k-means clustering yielded psychosis Biotypes; Rand Indices evaluated individual-case consistency of Biotype assignments. Psychosis subgroups, their non-psychotic first-degree relatives, and healthy individuals were compared across bio-factors. The three psychosis Biotypes differed significantly on all 11 bio-factors, especially prominent for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitude, and intrinsic neural activity. Rand Indices showed excellent individual-case consistency of Biotype membership when samples included more than 1000 subjects. Canonical discriminant analysis described composite bio-factors that simplified group comparisons: "Pattern-2" (high antisaccade errors, low BACS, high ongoing EEG) captured Biotype-2, "Pattern-1" (low ERP amplitudes, low intrinsic EEG) captured Biotype-1, and "Pattern-3" (low frontal P3 complex, accentuated S2 ERP, faster saccadic reaction times) captured Biotype-3. First-degree relatives had patterns like their proband for general cognition, antisaccades, ERP magnitudes, and intrinsic brain activity. These outcomes refine and extend operations for characterizing biologically distinct psychosis Biotypes. They also show that over 1000 observations are useful for achieving consistent individual-case diagnostic assignments. First-degree relative data implicate specific bio-factors as familial within idiopathic psychosis which may inform genetic studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信