从差距到依从性:瑞士中部结直肠癌错配修复蛋白检测和Lynch综合征鉴定趋势的12年回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bettina Marturet Fendt, Celina Geiss, Muriel Elhai, Joachim Diebold, Alexander Vogetseder
{"title":"从差距到依从性:瑞士中部结直肠癌错配修复蛋白检测和Lynch综合征鉴定趋势的12年回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Bettina Marturet Fendt, Celina Geiss, Muriel Elhai, Joachim Diebold, Alexander Vogetseder","doi":"10.57187/s.4345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aim: </strong>Alongside an analysis of incidence trends in colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome over time, the study sought to evaluate the implementation and trends of reflex testing for mismatch repair proteins and key mutations in relevant genes (BRAF, KRAS, NRAS) in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland from 2011 to 2022, specifically assessing adherence to the Swiss Academy for Quality in Medicine (SAQM) guidelines, in order to identify any gaps or inconsistencies in testing practices that may hinder the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome or microsatellite instability, highlighting areas requiring improvements for optimal patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 2602 patients with 2673 histologically confirmed colorectal cancers. Data collection from the Central Switzerland Cancer Registry included demographic, molecular and immunohistochemical profiles of all histologically confirmed colorectal cancers over the analysed 12-year period. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v4.3.1) with the tidyverse package. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and non-parametric comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, while Poisson and binomial regression models were used to evaluate temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2673 tumours analysed, 76% were tested for mismatch repair proteins, with testing rates improving significantly from 58% in 2011 to >99% in 2022. Among these, 14% showed a mismatch repair protein deficiency, with 77% being MLH1-related and 23% non-MLH1-related, categorising them as Lynch-suspected. 73% (n = 257) of the MLH1-deficient tumours underwent further molecular testing for BRAF mutations. Among these, 33% showed no mutation, also categorising them as Lynch-suspected, while the remaining 67% were categorised as sporadic. In total, 6% of the tested tumours were categorised as Lynch-suspected and required further testing and/or genetic counselling. Statistical estimates suggest that among the non-tested tumours, 88 cases could potentially harbour a microsatellite instability, including approximately 5 Lynch-suspected cases. Additionally, in 44 cases, incorrect mismatch repair proteins were tested, potentially leading to missed microsatellite instability. Among the 59 tumours that did not undergo BRAF testing, approximately 20 may have been Lynch-suspected and missed due to insufficient testing. Tumour incidence and the proportion of Lynch-suspected tumours among all tumours remained stable over time, without cantonal hotspots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remarkable progress in colorectal cancer diagnostics across Central Switzerland could be demonstrated, leading to a near-complete compliance with guidelines for mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing by 2022. This high adherence to guidelines provides a solid foundation for better personalised surveillance and treatment, ultimately improving the quality of care for colorectal cancer patients in the region. However, during the early years of the study some gaps existed, particularly in testing practices for rectal cancers and incomplete molecular follow-up, potentially missing some patients with a microsatellite instability, who could have benefited from different therapies, and Lynch syndrome patients, who together with their families could have benefited from tighter surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"4345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From gaps to compliance: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of trends in mismatch repair protein testing and Lynch syndrome identification in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Marturet Fendt, Celina Geiss, Muriel Elhai, Joachim Diebold, Alexander Vogetseder\",\"doi\":\"10.57187/s.4345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study aim: </strong>Alongside an analysis of incidence trends in colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome over time, the study sought to evaluate the implementation and trends of reflex testing for mismatch repair proteins and key mutations in relevant genes (BRAF, KRAS, NRAS) in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland from 2011 to 2022, specifically assessing adherence to the Swiss Academy for Quality in Medicine (SAQM) guidelines, in order to identify any gaps or inconsistencies in testing practices that may hinder the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome or microsatellite instability, highlighting areas requiring improvements for optimal patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 2602 patients with 2673 histologically confirmed colorectal cancers. Data collection from the Central Switzerland Cancer Registry included demographic, molecular and immunohistochemical profiles of all histologically confirmed colorectal cancers over the analysed 12-year period. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v4.3.1) with the tidyverse package. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and non-parametric comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, while Poisson and binomial regression models were used to evaluate temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2673 tumours analysed, 76% were tested for mismatch repair proteins, with testing rates improving significantly from 58% in 2011 to >99% in 2022. Among these, 14% showed a mismatch repair protein deficiency, with 77% being MLH1-related and 23% non-MLH1-related, categorising them as Lynch-suspected. 73% (n = 257) of the MLH1-deficient tumours underwent further molecular testing for BRAF mutations. Among these, 33% showed no mutation, also categorising them as Lynch-suspected, while the remaining 67% were categorised as sporadic. In total, 6% of the tested tumours were categorised as Lynch-suspected and required further testing and/or genetic counselling. Statistical estimates suggest that among the non-tested tumours, 88 cases could potentially harbour a microsatellite instability, including approximately 5 Lynch-suspected cases. Additionally, in 44 cases, incorrect mismatch repair proteins were tested, potentially leading to missed microsatellite instability. Among the 59 tumours that did not undergo BRAF testing, approximately 20 may have been Lynch-suspected and missed due to insufficient testing. Tumour incidence and the proportion of Lynch-suspected tumours among all tumours remained stable over time, without cantonal hotspots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remarkable progress in colorectal cancer diagnostics across Central Switzerland could be demonstrated, leading to a near-complete compliance with guidelines for mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing by 2022. This high adherence to guidelines provides a solid foundation for better personalised surveillance and treatment, ultimately improving the quality of care for colorectal cancer patients in the region. However, during the early years of the study some gaps existed, particularly in testing practices for rectal cancers and incomplete molecular follow-up, potentially missing some patients with a microsatellite instability, who could have benefited from different therapies, and Lynch syndrome patients, who together with their families could have benefited from tighter surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"4345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:除了分析结直肠癌和Lynch综合征随时间的发病率趋势外,该研究还试图评估2011年至2022年瑞士中部结直肠癌中错配修复蛋白和相关基因(BRAF, KRAS, NRAS)关键突变反射测试的实施和趋势,特别是评估对瑞士医学质量学院(SAQM)指南的遵守情况。以确定检测实践中可能妨碍Lynch综合征或微卫星不稳定性诊断的任何差距或不一致之处,突出需要改进的领域,以获得最佳的患者护理。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2602例经组织学证实的结直肠癌患者,其中2673例。从瑞士中部癌症登记处收集的数据包括在分析的12年期间所有组织学证实的结直肠癌的人口统计学、分子和免疫组织化学特征。统计分析使用R (v4.3.1)和tidyverse包进行。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估正态性,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行非参数比较。分类变量使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,而泊松和二项回归模型用于评估时间趋势。结果:在分析的2673个肿瘤中,76%的肿瘤进行了错配修复蛋白检测,检测率从2011年的58%显著提高到2022年的99%。其中14%显示错配修复蛋白缺乏,77%与mlh1相关,23%与非mlh1相关,归类为lynch -嫌疑人。73% (n = 257)的mlh1缺陷肿瘤进行了BRAF突变的进一步分子检测。在这些人中,33%没有突变,也被归类为疑似林奇,而其余67%被归类为散发性。总共有6%的检测肿瘤被归类为林奇疑似肿瘤,需要进一步检测和/或遗传咨询。统计估计表明,在未检测的肿瘤中,88例可能存在微卫星不稳定性,其中包括约5例林奇疑似病例。此外,在44例中,错误的错配修复蛋白被测试,可能导致遗漏微卫星不稳定性。在未进行BRAF检测的59例肿瘤中,约有20例可能因检测不足而被lynch - suspicion遗漏。随着时间的推移,肿瘤发病率和疑似林奇肿瘤在所有肿瘤中的比例保持稳定,没有地区热点。结论:大肠癌诊断在瑞士中部地区取得了显著进展,到2022年,大肠癌诊断几乎完全符合错配修复蛋白和分子检测指南。这种对指南的高度遵守为更好地进行个性化监测和治疗提供了坚实的基础,最终提高了该地区结直肠癌患者的护理质量。然而,在研究的早期,存在一些差距,特别是在直肠癌的测试实践和不完整的分子随访中,可能遗漏了一些可能从不同治疗中受益的微卫星不稳定性患者,以及林奇综合征患者,他们及其家人可能从更严格的监测中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From gaps to compliance: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of trends in mismatch repair protein testing and Lynch syndrome identification in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland.

Study aim: Alongside an analysis of incidence trends in colorectal cancer and Lynch syndrome over time, the study sought to evaluate the implementation and trends of reflex testing for mismatch repair proteins and key mutations in relevant genes (BRAF, KRAS, NRAS) in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland from 2011 to 2022, specifically assessing adherence to the Swiss Academy for Quality in Medicine (SAQM) guidelines, in order to identify any gaps or inconsistencies in testing practices that may hinder the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome or microsatellite instability, highlighting areas requiring improvements for optimal patient care.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 2602 patients with 2673 histologically confirmed colorectal cancers. Data collection from the Central Switzerland Cancer Registry included demographic, molecular and immunohistochemical profiles of all histologically confirmed colorectal cancers over the analysed 12-year period. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v4.3.1) with the tidyverse package. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and non-parametric comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, while Poisson and binomial regression models were used to evaluate temporal trends.

Results: Of 2673 tumours analysed, 76% were tested for mismatch repair proteins, with testing rates improving significantly from 58% in 2011 to >99% in 2022. Among these, 14% showed a mismatch repair protein deficiency, with 77% being MLH1-related and 23% non-MLH1-related, categorising them as Lynch-suspected. 73% (n = 257) of the MLH1-deficient tumours underwent further molecular testing for BRAF mutations. Among these, 33% showed no mutation, also categorising them as Lynch-suspected, while the remaining 67% were categorised as sporadic. In total, 6% of the tested tumours were categorised as Lynch-suspected and required further testing and/or genetic counselling. Statistical estimates suggest that among the non-tested tumours, 88 cases could potentially harbour a microsatellite instability, including approximately 5 Lynch-suspected cases. Additionally, in 44 cases, incorrect mismatch repair proteins were tested, potentially leading to missed microsatellite instability. Among the 59 tumours that did not undergo BRAF testing, approximately 20 may have been Lynch-suspected and missed due to insufficient testing. Tumour incidence and the proportion of Lynch-suspected tumours among all tumours remained stable over time, without cantonal hotspots.

Conclusions: Remarkable progress in colorectal cancer diagnostics across Central Switzerland could be demonstrated, leading to a near-complete compliance with guidelines for mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing by 2022. This high adherence to guidelines provides a solid foundation for better personalised surveillance and treatment, ultimately improving the quality of care for colorectal cancer patients in the region. However, during the early years of the study some gaps existed, particularly in testing practices for rectal cancers and incomplete molecular follow-up, potentially missing some patients with a microsatellite instability, who could have benefited from different therapies, and Lynch syndrome patients, who together with their families could have benefited from tighter surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信