昆虫的食草性对两种传粉媒介的行为有不同的影响。

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Hanneke A C Suijkerbuijk, Erik H Poelman
{"title":"昆虫的食草性对两种传粉媒介的行为有不同的影响。","authors":"Hanneke A C Suijkerbuijk, Erik H Poelman","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05777-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollinator behaviour during floral visits shapes plant mating opportunities, influencing the likelihood of outcrossing versus selfing. These behaviours may be affected by plant responses to antagonists such as insect herbivores. This study aimed to better understand how insect herbivory affects visitation behaviour of two pollinator community members of field mustard (Brassica rapa): the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) and the large cabbage white butterfly (Pieris brassicae). In field tent experiments, we allowed caterpillars of P. brassicae to develop from leaf-feeding early instars to flower-feeding late instars and assessed pollinator response to undamaged and damaged plants during 10-min observations. We recorded behaviours with potential effect on outcrossing: (first) choice and overall plant preference, plant visit duration, number and duration of flower visits per plant, and distance travelled between plant visits. Bumblebees visited more plants and flowers, but spent less time per flower than butterflies did. Bumblebees often travelled to neighboring plants, whereas butterflies often flew longer distances to reach a next plant. Herbivory by large florivorous caterpillars altered butterfly plant choice-mostly towards plants with caterpillars, but not their behaviour on the plant. Bumblebees did not alter their choices, but changed their behaviour on the plant: they visited more flowers on plants with herbivory. However, herbivory by small leaf-feeding caterpillars did not affect the behaviour of either pollinator. Our results show that pollinator community members respond differently to herbivory and that this response changes over time, potentially affecting plant mating patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 9","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insect herbivory differentially affects the behaviour of two pollinators of Brassica rapa.\",\"authors\":\"Hanneke A C Suijkerbuijk, Erik H Poelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05777-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pollinator behaviour during floral visits shapes plant mating opportunities, influencing the likelihood of outcrossing versus selfing. These behaviours may be affected by plant responses to antagonists such as insect herbivores. This study aimed to better understand how insect herbivory affects visitation behaviour of two pollinator community members of field mustard (Brassica rapa): the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) and the large cabbage white butterfly (Pieris brassicae). In field tent experiments, we allowed caterpillars of P. brassicae to develop from leaf-feeding early instars to flower-feeding late instars and assessed pollinator response to undamaged and damaged plants during 10-min observations. We recorded behaviours with potential effect on outcrossing: (first) choice and overall plant preference, plant visit duration, number and duration of flower visits per plant, and distance travelled between plant visits. Bumblebees visited more plants and flowers, but spent less time per flower than butterflies did. Bumblebees often travelled to neighboring plants, whereas butterflies often flew longer distances to reach a next plant. Herbivory by large florivorous caterpillars altered butterfly plant choice-mostly towards plants with caterpillars, but not their behaviour on the plant. Bumblebees did not alter their choices, but changed their behaviour on the plant: they visited more flowers on plants with herbivory. However, herbivory by small leaf-feeding caterpillars did not affect the behaviour of either pollinator. Our results show that pollinator community members respond differently to herbivory and that this response changes over time, potentially affecting plant mating patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 9\",\"pages\":\"143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354498/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05777-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05777-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传粉者在访花期间的行为决定了植物的交配机会,影响了异交与自交的可能性。这些行为可能受到植物对拮抗物(如食草昆虫)的反应的影响。本研究旨在更好地了解昆虫食草性如何影响油菜(Brassica rapa)两种传粉者群落成员:黄尾大黄蜂(Bombus terrestris)和大白菜白蝴蝶(Pieris brassicae)的访花行为。在野外帐篷实验中,我们让芸苔科(P. brassicae)幼虫从食叶早期发育到食花晚期,并在10分钟的观察中评估传粉媒介对未受损和受损植物的反应。我们记录了对异交有潜在影响的行为:(第一)对植物的选择和总体偏好,植物访问时间,每株花的访问次数和持续时间,以及访问植物之间的距离。大黄蜂拜访了更多的植物和花朵,但花在每朵花上的时间比蝴蝶少。大黄蜂经常飞到邻近的植物,而蝴蝶经常飞得更远才能到达下一个植物。大型食花毛虫的食草性改变了蝴蝶对植物的选择——主要是对有毛虫的植物的选择,而不是它们对植物的行为。大黄蜂没有改变它们的选择,但改变了它们在植物上的行为:它们在食草植物上访问了更多的花朵。然而,小叶食性毛虫的食草性不影响任何传粉者的行为。我们的研究结果表明,传粉者群落成员对草食的反应不同,这种反应随着时间的推移而变化,可能影响植物的交配模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insect herbivory differentially affects the behaviour of two pollinators of Brassica rapa.

Pollinator behaviour during floral visits shapes plant mating opportunities, influencing the likelihood of outcrossing versus selfing. These behaviours may be affected by plant responses to antagonists such as insect herbivores. This study aimed to better understand how insect herbivory affects visitation behaviour of two pollinator community members of field mustard (Brassica rapa): the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) and the large cabbage white butterfly (Pieris brassicae). In field tent experiments, we allowed caterpillars of P. brassicae to develop from leaf-feeding early instars to flower-feeding late instars and assessed pollinator response to undamaged and damaged plants during 10-min observations. We recorded behaviours with potential effect on outcrossing: (first) choice and overall plant preference, plant visit duration, number and duration of flower visits per plant, and distance travelled between plant visits. Bumblebees visited more plants and flowers, but spent less time per flower than butterflies did. Bumblebees often travelled to neighboring plants, whereas butterflies often flew longer distances to reach a next plant. Herbivory by large florivorous caterpillars altered butterfly plant choice-mostly towards plants with caterpillars, but not their behaviour on the plant. Bumblebees did not alter their choices, but changed their behaviour on the plant: they visited more flowers on plants with herbivory. However, herbivory by small leaf-feeding caterpillars did not affect the behaviour of either pollinator. Our results show that pollinator community members respond differently to herbivory and that this response changes over time, potentially affecting plant mating patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信