人工智能算法有效地对实验室和家中记录的足月和早产婴儿的38种动作进行分类。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yohanes Purwanto, Erick Chandra, Po-Nien Tsao, Ting-An Yen, Wei-Chih Liao, Wei J Chen, Chin-Yi Liao, Chun-Wen Hsieh, Jane Yung-Jen Hsu, Suh-Fang Jeng
{"title":"人工智能算法有效地对实验室和家中记录的足月和早产婴儿的38种动作进行分类。","authors":"Yohanes Purwanto, Erick Chandra, Po-Nien Tsao, Ting-An Yen, Wei-Chih Liao, Wei J Chen, Chin-Yi Liao, Chun-Wen Hsieh, Jane Yung-Jen Hsu, Suh-Fang Jeng","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) provide an alternative for infant motor assessment, such applications focus mainly on infants' movements within a narrow age range in a laboratory setting. This study aimed to develop and validate AI algorithms for movement recognition in full-term and preterm children in the laboratory and at home throughout infancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 85 full-term infants and 84 preterm infants who were video recorded during the Alberta Infant Motor Assessment (AIMS) administered by physiotherapists in a laboratory, while parents uploaded movement videos at home using the Baby Go mobile application (app) from 4 to 18 months of age. An AI model was developed to classify movements using physiotherapists' labeling results as the ground truth. The AI-classified movements were organized into age-based sets to test concurrent validity against the AIMS examiners' results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation of the AI model for classifying 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants revealed an accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.92, recall of 0.90, and F1 score of 0.91 with the laboratory videos and an accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.84, recall of 0.77, and F1 score of 0.78 with the home videos. These movements were dispatched into age-based sets with two to five movements per age that showed high concurrent validity with the AIMS results (agreement = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately classified 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants performed in the laboratory and at home. The age-based sets also highly correlated with the physiotherapists' assessment results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence algorithms effectively classify 38 movements in infants born full-term and preterm recorded in the laboratory and at home.\",\"authors\":\"Yohanes Purwanto, Erick Chandra, Po-Nien Tsao, Ting-An Yen, Wei-Chih Liao, Wei J Chen, Chin-Yi Liao, Chun-Wen Hsieh, Jane Yung-Jen Hsu, Suh-Fang Jeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) provide an alternative for infant motor assessment, such applications focus mainly on infants' movements within a narrow age range in a laboratory setting. This study aimed to develop and validate AI algorithms for movement recognition in full-term and preterm children in the laboratory and at home throughout infancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 85 full-term infants and 84 preterm infants who were video recorded during the Alberta Infant Motor Assessment (AIMS) administered by physiotherapists in a laboratory, while parents uploaded movement videos at home using the Baby Go mobile application (app) from 4 to 18 months of age. An AI model was developed to classify movements using physiotherapists' labeling results as the ground truth. The AI-classified movements were organized into age-based sets to test concurrent validity against the AIMS examiners' results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation of the AI model for classifying 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants revealed an accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.92, recall of 0.90, and F1 score of 0.91 with the laboratory videos and an accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.84, recall of 0.77, and F1 score of 0.78 with the home videos. These movements were dispatched into age-based sets with two to five movements per age that showed high concurrent validity with the AIMS results (agreement = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately classified 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants performed in the laboratory and at home. The age-based sets also highly correlated with the physiotherapists' assessment results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管人工智能(AI)的最新进展为婴儿运动评估提供了另一种选择,但此类应用主要集中在实验室环境中狭窄年龄范围内的婴儿运动。本研究旨在开发和验证人工智能算法,用于足月和早产儿在实验室和家中的整个婴儿期的运动识别。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括85名足月婴儿和84名早产儿,这些婴儿在实验室由物理治疗师进行的阿尔伯塔婴儿运动评估(AIMS)期间进行视频记录,而父母则在家中使用Baby Go移动应用程序(app)上传4至18个月大的运动视频。开发了一个人工智能模型,以物理治疗师的标签结果为基础,对运动进行分类。人工智能分类的动作被组织成基于年龄的集合,以测试针对AIMS审查员结果的并发效度。结果:人工智能模型对足月和早产儿的38个动作进行分类验证,实验室视频的准确率为0.91,精度为0.92,召回率为0.90,F1评分为0.91;家庭视频的准确率为0.84,精度为0.84,召回率为0.77,F1评分为0.78。这些动作被分配到基于年龄的组中,每个年龄有2到5个动作,与AIMS结果显示高并发效度(一致性= 0.99)。结论:人工智能模型准确分类了在实验室和家中进行的38个足月和早产儿动作。基于年龄的组也与物理治疗师的评估结果高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence algorithms effectively classify 38 movements in infants born full-term and preterm recorded in the laboratory and at home.

Background: Although recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) provide an alternative for infant motor assessment, such applications focus mainly on infants' movements within a narrow age range in a laboratory setting. This study aimed to develop and validate AI algorithms for movement recognition in full-term and preterm children in the laboratory and at home throughout infancy.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 85 full-term infants and 84 preterm infants who were video recorded during the Alberta Infant Motor Assessment (AIMS) administered by physiotherapists in a laboratory, while parents uploaded movement videos at home using the Baby Go mobile application (app) from 4 to 18 months of age. An AI model was developed to classify movements using physiotherapists' labeling results as the ground truth. The AI-classified movements were organized into age-based sets to test concurrent validity against the AIMS examiners' results.

Results: Validation of the AI model for classifying 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants revealed an accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.92, recall of 0.90, and F1 score of 0.91 with the laboratory videos and an accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.84, recall of 0.77, and F1 score of 0.78 with the home videos. These movements were dispatched into age-based sets with two to five movements per age that showed high concurrent validity with the AIMS results (agreement = 0.99).

Conclusions: The AI model accurately classified 38 movements in full-term and preterm infants performed in the laboratory and at home. The age-based sets also highly correlated with the physiotherapists' assessment results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信