Kari Lambing, Veronica Guadagni, Bethany Gerardy, Amy Bender, Magdy Younes, Célyne H Bastien
{"title":"优势比乘积作为失眠表型的生物学标记。","authors":"Kari Lambing, Veronica Guadagni, Bethany Gerardy, Amy Bender, Magdy Younes, Célyne H Bastien","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia-Severity-Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control (n = 50) or insomnia (n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in-laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full-wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP-9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with 'Objectively Normal' and 'Objectively Poor' metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORP<sub>wake</sub>, ORP<sub>NREM</sub>, ORP<sub>REM</sub>, %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP-9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odds Ratio Product as a Biological Marker of Phenotypes of Insomnia.\",\"authors\":\"Kari Lambing, Veronica Guadagni, Bethany Gerardy, Amy Bender, Magdy Younes, Célyne H Bastien\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia-Severity-Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control (n = 50) or insomnia (n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in-laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full-wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP-9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with 'Objectively Normal' and 'Objectively Poor' metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORP<sub>wake</sub>, ORP<sub>NREM</sub>, ORP<sub>REM</sub>, %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP-9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Odds Ratio Product as a Biological Marker of Phenotypes of Insomnia.
The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia-Severity-Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control (n = 50) or insomnia (n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in-laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full-wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP-9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with 'Objectively Normal' and 'Objectively Poor' metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORPwake, ORPNREM, ORPREM, %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP-9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.