显微外科应用Symani系统的临床优点与缺陷。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anshul Ratnaparkhi, Emily Finkelstein, Aneeq S Chaudhry, Kyle Xu, Kashyap Tadisina, Miguel Medina, Sara Danker, Devinder Singh, Juan Rodolfo Mella-Catinchi
{"title":"显微外科应用Symani系统的临床优点与缺陷。","authors":"Anshul Ratnaparkhi, Emily Finkelstein, Aneeq S Chaudhry, Kyle Xu, Kashyap Tadisina, Miguel Medina, Sara Danker, Devinder Singh, Juan Rodolfo Mella-Catinchi","doi":"10.1055/a-2659-7126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The improved stability and controllability of robotics has the potential to expand the spectrum of reconstructive surgery. Until recently, however, no robot was designed specifically for microsurgery. The present study aims to summarize the clinical pearls and pitfalls of utilizing the Symani Surgical System in microsurgical practice.The PubMed Database was queried using the search term \"Symani Robot System\" from inception until January 2025. Data regarding demographics, study design, technique, and surgical outcomes were extracted from the full text by two independent reviewers.In the present analysis, 21 publications encompassing the results of 397 patients (range: 1-100) and 642 robotic anastomoses were included. Of the 335 patients included in the studies that reported complication rates, pooled analysis yielded an overall complication rate of 14.03% (<i>n</i> = 47) and a partial or complete flap loss rate of 2.09% (<i>n</i> = 7). Of 642 robotic total anastomoses, only 1.24% (<i>n</i> = 8) required a transition to a manual approach. A total of 19 groups (90.47%) reported high precision of Symani, 15 (71.43%) highlighted improved surgical access to deeper anatomical fields, and 12 (57.15%) reported enhanced microsurgical ergonomics. Regarding limitations, 13 (61.90%) cited the expense of the system, 5 (23.81%) reported a lack of haptic feedback, 5 (23.81%) identified instrument \"stickiness\" as a factor slowing operations, and 3 (14.29%) highlighted the need for improved grip. The learning curve associated with Symani was discussed in 15 studies (71.43%).The results of the present literature review demonstrate that the Symani robot offers numerous benefits that will help advance the field of microsurgery. It provides complete tremor elimination, motion scaling, and improved operative ergonomics, leading to patent anastomosis and complication rates comparable to a traditional manual approach. However, more data are needed before widespread clinical implementation to determine whether the increased precision and controllability outweigh the cost and learning curve.The present study highlights the use of the Symani Surgical System, a novel robotic system designed specifically for microsurgery. Symani offers increased precision, dexterity, controllability, and numerous benefits that will help advance the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls of Using the Symani System in Microsurgery.\",\"authors\":\"Anshul Ratnaparkhi, Emily Finkelstein, Aneeq S Chaudhry, Kyle Xu, Kashyap Tadisina, Miguel Medina, Sara Danker, Devinder Singh, Juan Rodolfo Mella-Catinchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2659-7126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The improved stability and controllability of robotics has the potential to expand the spectrum of reconstructive surgery. Until recently, however, no robot was designed specifically for microsurgery. The present study aims to summarize the clinical pearls and pitfalls of utilizing the Symani Surgical System in microsurgical practice.The PubMed Database was queried using the search term \\\"Symani Robot System\\\" from inception until January 2025. Data regarding demographics, study design, technique, and surgical outcomes were extracted from the full text by two independent reviewers.In the present analysis, 21 publications encompassing the results of 397 patients (range: 1-100) and 642 robotic anastomoses were included. Of the 335 patients included in the studies that reported complication rates, pooled analysis yielded an overall complication rate of 14.03% (<i>n</i> = 47) and a partial or complete flap loss rate of 2.09% (<i>n</i> = 7). Of 642 robotic total anastomoses, only 1.24% (<i>n</i> = 8) required a transition to a manual approach. A total of 19 groups (90.47%) reported high precision of Symani, 15 (71.43%) highlighted improved surgical access to deeper anatomical fields, and 12 (57.15%) reported enhanced microsurgical ergonomics. Regarding limitations, 13 (61.90%) cited the expense of the system, 5 (23.81%) reported a lack of haptic feedback, 5 (23.81%) identified instrument \\\"stickiness\\\" as a factor slowing operations, and 3 (14.29%) highlighted the need for improved grip. The learning curve associated with Symani was discussed in 15 studies (71.43%).The results of the present literature review demonstrate that the Symani robot offers numerous benefits that will help advance the field of microsurgery. It provides complete tremor elimination, motion scaling, and improved operative ergonomics, leading to patent anastomosis and complication rates comparable to a traditional manual approach. However, more data are needed before widespread clinical implementation to determine whether the increased precision and controllability outweigh the cost and learning curve.The present study highlights the use of the Symani Surgical System, a novel robotic system designed specifically for microsurgery. Symani offers increased precision, dexterity, controllability, and numerous benefits that will help advance the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2659-7126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2659-7126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人技术的稳定性和可控性的改进有可能扩大重建手术的范围。然而,直到最近,还没有专门为显微手术设计的机器人。本研究旨在总结Symani外科系统在显微外科实践中应用的临床优点和缺陷。PubMed数据库从建立到2025年1月使用搜索词“Symani机器人系统”进行查询。有关人口统计学、研究设计、技术和手术结果的数据由两名独立审稿人从全文中提取。在目前的分析中,21篇出版物包括397例患者(范围:1-100)和642台机器人吻合器的结果。在报告并发症发生率的研究中纳入的335例患者中,汇总分析得出总并发症发生率为14.03% (n = 47),部分或完全皮瓣丢失率为2.09% (n = 7)。在642例机器人全吻合术中,只有1.24% (n = 8)需要过渡到人工方法。共有19组(90.47%)报告了Symani的高精度,15组(71.43%)强调了手术进入更深解剖领域的改善,12组(57.15%)报告了显微外科人机工程学的改善。关于局限性,13人(61.90%)认为系统费用高,5人(23.81%)认为缺乏触觉反馈,5人(23.81%)认为仪器“粘性”是减慢操作的一个因素,3人(14.29%)强调需要改善抓地力。15项研究(71.43%)讨论了与Symani相关的学习曲线。目前文献综述的结果表明,Symani机器人提供了许多好处,将有助于推进显微外科领域。它提供了完全的震颤消除,运动缩放和改进的手术人体工程学,导致吻合通畅和并发症发生率与传统的手工方法相当。然而,在广泛的临床应用之前,需要更多的数据来确定精确度和可控性的提高是否超过了成本和学习曲线。本研究强调了Symani手术系统的使用,这是一种专门为显微手术设计的新型机器人系统。Symani提供了更高的精度,灵活性,可控性和许多好处,将有助于推进该领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls of Using the Symani System in Microsurgery.

The improved stability and controllability of robotics has the potential to expand the spectrum of reconstructive surgery. Until recently, however, no robot was designed specifically for microsurgery. The present study aims to summarize the clinical pearls and pitfalls of utilizing the Symani Surgical System in microsurgical practice.The PubMed Database was queried using the search term "Symani Robot System" from inception until January 2025. Data regarding demographics, study design, technique, and surgical outcomes were extracted from the full text by two independent reviewers.In the present analysis, 21 publications encompassing the results of 397 patients (range: 1-100) and 642 robotic anastomoses were included. Of the 335 patients included in the studies that reported complication rates, pooled analysis yielded an overall complication rate of 14.03% (n = 47) and a partial or complete flap loss rate of 2.09% (n = 7). Of 642 robotic total anastomoses, only 1.24% (n = 8) required a transition to a manual approach. A total of 19 groups (90.47%) reported high precision of Symani, 15 (71.43%) highlighted improved surgical access to deeper anatomical fields, and 12 (57.15%) reported enhanced microsurgical ergonomics. Regarding limitations, 13 (61.90%) cited the expense of the system, 5 (23.81%) reported a lack of haptic feedback, 5 (23.81%) identified instrument "stickiness" as a factor slowing operations, and 3 (14.29%) highlighted the need for improved grip. The learning curve associated with Symani was discussed in 15 studies (71.43%).The results of the present literature review demonstrate that the Symani robot offers numerous benefits that will help advance the field of microsurgery. It provides complete tremor elimination, motion scaling, and improved operative ergonomics, leading to patent anastomosis and complication rates comparable to a traditional manual approach. However, more data are needed before widespread clinical implementation to determine whether the increased precision and controllability outweigh the cost and learning curve.The present study highlights the use of the Symani Surgical System, a novel robotic system designed specifically for microsurgery. Symani offers increased precision, dexterity, controllability, and numerous benefits that will help advance the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信