Xiangyu Meng, Hongxiang Fu, Yajun Tong, Yanming Zhang, Litao Sun
{"title":"旋转椎动脉综合征的血流动力学改变:动态超声和确定阈值的诊断作用。","authors":"Xiangyu Meng, Hongxiang Fu, Yajun Tong, Yanming Zhang, Litao Sun","doi":"10.1002/jum.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of dynamic ultrasound in diagnosing rotational vertebral artery syndrome (RVAS) and its potential as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2022 to September 2024, 98 participants (49 suspected RVAS patients and 49 asymptomatic controls) underwent vertebral artery ultrasound in neutral and rotated head positions. Blood flow velocity and resistance index (RI) changes in the V2 and V3 artery segments were compared. Diagnostic performance and compression thresholds were assessed using independent t tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. An additional pilot study group of 10 participants (5 patients with suspected RVAS and 5 asymptomatic controls) was included to assess the diagnostic thresholds and the role of dynamic ultrasound in RVAS detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant hemodynamic changes were observed in the RVAS group after neck rotation but not in controls. In the V2 segment, velocity decreased from 51.76 ± 14.64 cm/s (neutral) to 44.61 ± 21.01 cm/s (rotated, P = .014). In the V3 segment, velocity increased from 69.37 ± 18.32 cm/s (neutral) to 161.18 ± 51.32 cm/s (rotated, P < .001). RI rose from 0.69 ± 0.06 to 0.76 ± 0.15 (P = .001). ROC analysis identified thresholds of V3 velocity >74.68 cm/s and V3 RI >0.71 for RVAS diagnosis (area under the curve = 0.80, sensitivity = 67.3%, specificity = 85.7%). In the pilot study group, the sensitivity was 80%, and the specificity was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic ultrasound effectively detects positional hemodynamic changes and serves as a valuable tool for RVAS diagnosis. Identified thresholds support its clinical utility, advocating broader adoption to improve early detection and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic Changes in Rotational Vertebral Artery Syndrome: Diagnostic Role of Dynamic Ultrasound and Identified Thresholds.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyu Meng, Hongxiang Fu, Yajun Tong, Yanming Zhang, Litao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of dynamic ultrasound in diagnosing rotational vertebral artery syndrome (RVAS) and its potential as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2022 to September 2024, 98 participants (49 suspected RVAS patients and 49 asymptomatic controls) underwent vertebral artery ultrasound in neutral and rotated head positions. Blood flow velocity and resistance index (RI) changes in the V2 and V3 artery segments were compared. Diagnostic performance and compression thresholds were assessed using independent t tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. An additional pilot study group of 10 participants (5 patients with suspected RVAS and 5 asymptomatic controls) was included to assess the diagnostic thresholds and the role of dynamic ultrasound in RVAS detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant hemodynamic changes were observed in the RVAS group after neck rotation but not in controls. In the V2 segment, velocity decreased from 51.76 ± 14.64 cm/s (neutral) to 44.61 ± 21.01 cm/s (rotated, P = .014). In the V3 segment, velocity increased from 69.37 ± 18.32 cm/s (neutral) to 161.18 ± 51.32 cm/s (rotated, P < .001). RI rose from 0.69 ± 0.06 to 0.76 ± 0.15 (P = .001). ROC analysis identified thresholds of V3 velocity >74.68 cm/s and V3 RI >0.71 for RVAS diagnosis (area under the curve = 0.80, sensitivity = 67.3%, specificity = 85.7%). In the pilot study group, the sensitivity was 80%, and the specificity was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic ultrasound effectively detects positional hemodynamic changes and serves as a valuable tool for RVAS diagnosis. Identified thresholds support its clinical utility, advocating broader adoption to improve early detection and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemodynamic Changes in Rotational Vertebral Artery Syndrome: Diagnostic Role of Dynamic Ultrasound and Identified Thresholds.
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of dynamic ultrasound in diagnosing rotational vertebral artery syndrome (RVAS) and its potential as a screening tool.
Methods: From January 2022 to September 2024, 98 participants (49 suspected RVAS patients and 49 asymptomatic controls) underwent vertebral artery ultrasound in neutral and rotated head positions. Blood flow velocity and resistance index (RI) changes in the V2 and V3 artery segments were compared. Diagnostic performance and compression thresholds were assessed using independent t tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. An additional pilot study group of 10 participants (5 patients with suspected RVAS and 5 asymptomatic controls) was included to assess the diagnostic thresholds and the role of dynamic ultrasound in RVAS detection.
Results: Significant hemodynamic changes were observed in the RVAS group after neck rotation but not in controls. In the V2 segment, velocity decreased from 51.76 ± 14.64 cm/s (neutral) to 44.61 ± 21.01 cm/s (rotated, P = .014). In the V3 segment, velocity increased from 69.37 ± 18.32 cm/s (neutral) to 161.18 ± 51.32 cm/s (rotated, P < .001). RI rose from 0.69 ± 0.06 to 0.76 ± 0.15 (P = .001). ROC analysis identified thresholds of V3 velocity >74.68 cm/s and V3 RI >0.71 for RVAS diagnosis (area under the curve = 0.80, sensitivity = 67.3%, specificity = 85.7%). In the pilot study group, the sensitivity was 80%, and the specificity was 100%.
Conclusion: Dynamic ultrasound effectively detects positional hemodynamic changes and serves as a valuable tool for RVAS diagnosis. Identified thresholds support its clinical utility, advocating broader adoption to improve early detection and management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound