Ibrahim Alhabli, Noman Ishaque, Mahesh Kate, Anas Alrohimi, Nishita Singh, Faysal Benali, MacKenzie Horn, Brian Buck, Ayoola Ademola, Houman Khosravani, Ramana Appireddy, Francois Moreau, Gordon Gubitz, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Dariush Dowlatshahi, Aleksandra Pikula, Jai J Shankar, Heather Williams, Thalia S Field, Atif Zafar, Tolulope Sajobi, Richard Swartz, Alexandre Y Poppe, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala
{"title":"静脉注射替奈普酶与急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗前血栓运动发生率较高相关:AcT随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Ibrahim Alhabli, Noman Ishaque, Mahesh Kate, Anas Alrohimi, Nishita Singh, Faysal Benali, MacKenzie Horn, Brian Buck, Ayoola Ademola, Houman Khosravani, Ramana Appireddy, Francois Moreau, Gordon Gubitz, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Dariush Dowlatshahi, Aleksandra Pikula, Jai J Shankar, Heather Williams, Thalia S Field, Atif Zafar, Tolulope Sajobi, Richard Swartz, Alexandre Y Poppe, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombus migration can occur in patients receiving IV thrombolysis for acute stroke. This study compared the effects of IV tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on thrombus movement in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the AcT trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intracranial occlusion on baseline CT angiography (CTA) who underwent EVT were included. Thrombus movement from baseline CTA to first angiographic EVT run was classified as no thrombus movement, thrombus extension (TE, movement to a proximal location on DSA compared with CTA), thrombus migration (TM, movement to a more distal location), or recanalization. Outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 and final extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1577 patients in the AcT trial, 496 patients with intracranial occlusions underwent EVT (median age 73 years, 50.8% female). No thrombus movement was seen in 398 patients (80.2%), TE in six (1.2%), TM in 77 (15.5%), and complete recanalization in 15 (3.0%). Tenecteplase recipients (n=252) had higher TM rates than alteplase recipients (19.4% vs 11.5%, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07). TM did not impact final successful reperfusion (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.38) but was associated with increased odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.06). Thrombolytic type did not affect the relationship between thrombus movement and study outcomes (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV tenecteplase is associated with higher thrombus migration rates before EVT compared with alteplase, which is linked to better functional outcomes. However, the type of thrombolytic agent did not affect final reperfusion and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous tenecteplase is associated with a higher incidence of thrombus movement before endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Alhabli, Noman Ishaque, Mahesh Kate, Anas Alrohimi, Nishita Singh, Faysal Benali, MacKenzie Horn, Brian Buck, Ayoola Ademola, Houman Khosravani, Ramana Appireddy, Francois Moreau, Gordon Gubitz, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Dariush Dowlatshahi, Aleksandra Pikula, Jai J Shankar, Heather Williams, Thalia S Field, Atif Zafar, Tolulope Sajobi, Richard Swartz, Alexandre Y Poppe, Andrew M Demchuk, Bijoy K Menon, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Fouzi Bala\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2025-023336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombus migration can occur in patients receiving IV thrombolysis for acute stroke. This study compared the effects of IV tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on thrombus movement in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the AcT trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intracranial occlusion on baseline CT angiography (CTA) who underwent EVT were included. Thrombus movement from baseline CTA to first angiographic EVT run was classified as no thrombus movement, thrombus extension (TE, movement to a proximal location on DSA compared with CTA), thrombus migration (TM, movement to a more distal location), or recanalization. Outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 and final extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1577 patients in the AcT trial, 496 patients with intracranial occlusions underwent EVT (median age 73 years, 50.8% female). No thrombus movement was seen in 398 patients (80.2%), TE in six (1.2%), TM in 77 (15.5%), and complete recanalization in 15 (3.0%). Tenecteplase recipients (n=252) had higher TM rates than alteplase recipients (19.4% vs 11.5%, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07). TM did not impact final successful reperfusion (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.38) but was associated with increased odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.06). Thrombolytic type did not affect the relationship between thrombus movement and study outcomes (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV tenecteplase is associated with higher thrombus migration rates before EVT compared with alteplase, which is linked to better functional outcomes. However, the type of thrombolytic agent did not affect final reperfusion and functional outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023336\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性脑卒中患者接受静脉溶栓治疗时可发生血栓迁移。本研究比较了AcT试验中静脉滴注替奈普酶(0.25 mg/kg)和阿替普酶(0.9 mg/kg)对血管内治疗(EVT)患者血栓运动的影响。方法:纳入基线CT血管造影(CTA)显示颅内闭塞并行EVT的患者。从基线CTA到第一次血管造影EVT的血栓移动分为无血栓移动、血栓延伸(TE,与CTA相比,在DSA上向近端位置移动)、血栓迁移(TM,向远端位置移动)或再通。结果为90天改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-2分,最终延长脑梗死溶栓评分2b-3分。采用混合效应logistic回归。结果:在AcT试验的1577例患者中,496例颅内闭塞患者接受了EVT(中位年龄73岁,50.8%为女性)。398例(80.2%)患者未见血栓运动,TE 6例(1.2%),TM 77例(15.5%),完全再通15例(3.0%)。替奈普酶受体(n=252)的TM发生率高于阿替普酶受体(19.4% vs 11.5%,调整OR (aOR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 ~ 3.07)。TM不影响最终的再灌注成功(aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40至1.38),但与90天mRS 0-2的几率增加相关(aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05至3.06)。溶栓类型不影响血栓运动与研究结果的关系(P < 0.05)。结论:与阿替普酶相比,静脉滴注替奈普酶与EVT前更高的血栓迁移率相关,这与更好的功能预后有关。然而,溶栓剂的类型不影响最终的再灌注和功能结局。
Intravenous tenecteplase is associated with a higher incidence of thrombus movement before endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomized controlled trial.
Background: Thrombus migration can occur in patients receiving IV thrombolysis for acute stroke. This study compared the effects of IV tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on thrombus movement in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the AcT trial.
Methods: Patients with intracranial occlusion on baseline CT angiography (CTA) who underwent EVT were included. Thrombus movement from baseline CTA to first angiographic EVT run was classified as no thrombus movement, thrombus extension (TE, movement to a proximal location on DSA compared with CTA), thrombus migration (TM, movement to a more distal location), or recanalization. Outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 and final extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.
Results: Of the 1577 patients in the AcT trial, 496 patients with intracranial occlusions underwent EVT (median age 73 years, 50.8% female). No thrombus movement was seen in 398 patients (80.2%), TE in six (1.2%), TM in 77 (15.5%), and complete recanalization in 15 (3.0%). Tenecteplase recipients (n=252) had higher TM rates than alteplase recipients (19.4% vs 11.5%, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07). TM did not impact final successful reperfusion (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.38) but was associated with increased odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.06). Thrombolytic type did not affect the relationship between thrombus movement and study outcomes (P>0.05).
Conclusion: IV tenecteplase is associated with higher thrombus migration rates before EVT compared with alteplase, which is linked to better functional outcomes. However, the type of thrombolytic agent did not affect final reperfusion and functional outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.