将成瘾药物纳入烧伤护理:优化兴奋剂阳性患者的疼痛管理。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Eloise W Stanton, Artur Manasyan, Michael I Kim, Sunnie Wong, Maxwell B Johnson, Justin Gillenwater
{"title":"将成瘾药物纳入烧伤护理:优化兴奋剂阳性患者的疼痛管理。","authors":"Eloise W Stanton, Artur Manasyan, Michael I Kim, Sunnie Wong, Maxwell B Johnson, Justin Gillenwater","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stimulant use poses significant challenges in burn care, complicating pain management and leading to poorer outcomes, including longer hospital stays, higher complication rates, and increased healthcare costs. This study evaluates burn-related outcomes in stimulant-positive patients, as well as tabulates how frequently addiction medicine consultations are used in burn patients with positive stimulant screens. Patients with positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants, including amphetamines and cocaine, were identified. The primary predictor variable was stimulant use, while primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, burn severity, complications, and overall outcomes of care. Out of 3403 burn patients (34% female, 66% male, with a mean age of 39.2 ± 22.8 years), 572 patients (16.8%) had positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants. Stimulant-positive patients had significantly longer hospital stays compared to stimulant-negative patients (17.7 vs. 10.7 days, P < .001), more severe burns (P = .001), and a higher incidence of complications (15.6% vs. 11.5%, P = .006). Despite these risks, only 12.6% (72 patients) of stimulant-positive burn patients received an addiction medicine consultation during their hospitalization. The use of addiction medicine consultations increased over time, rising from 3 consults in 2015 to 42 in 2023. A multidisciplinary approach that includes addiction medicine can help address both the complexities of pain management and substance use, leading to improved patient outcomes. Early involvement of addiction medicine could enhance pain management and recovery, emphasizing the need for more systematic integration of addiction medicine into burn care protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"725-729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Addiction Medicine Into Burn Care: Optimizing Pain Management in Stimulant-Positive Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Eloise W Stanton, Artur Manasyan, Michael I Kim, Sunnie Wong, Maxwell B Johnson, Justin Gillenwater\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stimulant use poses significant challenges in burn care, complicating pain management and leading to poorer outcomes, including longer hospital stays, higher complication rates, and increased healthcare costs. This study evaluates burn-related outcomes in stimulant-positive patients, as well as tabulates how frequently addiction medicine consultations are used in burn patients with positive stimulant screens. Patients with positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants, including amphetamines and cocaine, were identified. The primary predictor variable was stimulant use, while primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, burn severity, complications, and overall outcomes of care. Out of 3403 burn patients (34% female, 66% male, with a mean age of 39.2 ± 22.8 years), 572 patients (16.8%) had positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants. Stimulant-positive patients had significantly longer hospital stays compared to stimulant-negative patients (17.7 vs. 10.7 days, P < .001), more severe burns (P = .001), and a higher incidence of complications (15.6% vs. 11.5%, P = .006). Despite these risks, only 12.6% (72 patients) of stimulant-positive burn patients received an addiction medicine consultation during their hospitalization. The use of addiction medicine consultations increased over time, rising from 3 consults in 2015 to 42 in 2023. A multidisciplinary approach that includes addiction medicine can help address both the complexities of pain management and substance use, leading to improved patient outcomes. Early involvement of addiction medicine could enhance pain management and recovery, emphasizing the need for more systematic integration of addiction medicine into burn care protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"725-729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

兴奋剂的使用给烧伤护理带来了重大挑战,使疼痛管理复杂化,并导致较差的结果,包括更长的住院时间、更高的并发症发生率和增加的医疗费用。本研究评估了兴奋剂阳性患者的烧伤相关结果,并列出了兴奋剂筛查阳性的烧伤患者使用成瘾药物咨询的频率。对兴奋剂(包括安非他明和可卡因)尿液毒理学筛查呈阳性的患者进行了鉴定。主要预测变量是兴奋剂的使用,而主要结果包括住院时间、烧伤严重程度、并发症和护理的总体结果。3403例烧伤患者(女性34%,男性66%,平均年龄39.2±22.8岁)中,572例(16.8%)患者尿毒学筛查阳性。与兴奋剂阴性患者相比,兴奋剂阳性患者的住院时间明显更长(17.7天对10.7天,P < 0.001),烧伤更严重(P = 0.001),并发症发生率更高(15.6%对11.5%,P = 0.006)。尽管存在这些风险,但只有12.6%(72名患者)的兴奋剂阳性烧伤患者在住院期间接受了成瘾药物咨询。成瘾药物咨询的使用随着时间的推移而增加,从2015年的3次咨询增加到2023年的42次。包括成瘾药物在内的多学科方法可以帮助解决疼痛管理和药物使用的复杂性,从而改善患者的预后。早期介入成瘾药物可以加强疼痛管理和恢复,强调需要更系统地将成瘾药物整合到烧伤护理方案中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Addiction Medicine Into Burn Care: Optimizing Pain Management in Stimulant-Positive Patients.

Stimulant use poses significant challenges in burn care, complicating pain management and leading to poorer outcomes, including longer hospital stays, higher complication rates, and increased healthcare costs. This study evaluates burn-related outcomes in stimulant-positive patients, as well as tabulates how frequently addiction medicine consultations are used in burn patients with positive stimulant screens. Patients with positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants, including amphetamines and cocaine, were identified. The primary predictor variable was stimulant use, while primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, burn severity, complications, and overall outcomes of care. Out of 3403 burn patients (34% female, 66% male, with a mean age of 39.2 ± 22.8 years), 572 patients (16.8%) had positive urine toxicology screens for stimulants. Stimulant-positive patients had significantly longer hospital stays compared to stimulant-negative patients (17.7 vs. 10.7 days, P < .001), more severe burns (P = .001), and a higher incidence of complications (15.6% vs. 11.5%, P = .006). Despite these risks, only 12.6% (72 patients) of stimulant-positive burn patients received an addiction medicine consultation during their hospitalization. The use of addiction medicine consultations increased over time, rising from 3 consults in 2015 to 42 in 2023. A multidisciplinary approach that includes addiction medicine can help address both the complexities of pain management and substance use, leading to improved patient outcomes. Early involvement of addiction medicine could enhance pain management and recovery, emphasizing the need for more systematic integration of addiction medicine into burn care protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信