{"title":"椎板切除术和椎板成形术混合减压与椎板切除术加侧块螺钉固定治疗退行性颈椎病:一项倾向评分匹配的研究。","authors":"Qiang Zhang, Yuan Xue, Rongzhi Ma, Shuai Li","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"2567-2574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Zhang, Yuan Xue, Rongzhi Ma, Shuai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2567-2574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched study.
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Methods: A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.
Results: Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.
Conclusion: Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.