椎板切除术和椎板成形术混合减压与椎板切除术加侧块螺钉固定治疗退行性颈椎病:一项倾向评分匹配的研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y
Qiang Zhang, Yuan Xue, Rongzhi Ma, Shuai Li
{"title":"椎板切除术和椎板成形术混合减压与椎板切除术加侧块螺钉固定治疗退行性颈椎病:一项倾向评分匹配的研究。","authors":"Qiang Zhang, Yuan Xue, Rongzhi Ma, Shuai Li","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"2567-2574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Zhang, Yuan Xue, Rongzhi Ma, Shuai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2567-2574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06640-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较后路椎板切除术与椎板成形术混合减压椎板切除术加侧块螺钉固定治疗多节段退行性颈椎病的临床和影像学结果。方法:2018年5月至2023年12月,共入组158例接受手术治疗的多节段退行性颈椎病(DCM)患者,其中97例接受后路椎板切除术和椎板成形术混合减压(PLLDH), 61例接受后路侧块螺钉固定(PLMSF)。为尽量减少潜在的混杂因素,采用倾向评分匹配进行组间比较。系统比较两组患者的神经功能评分和影像学参数。结果:根据倾向评分匹配(PSM),基线特征在两个手术组之间无统计学差异。配对队列显示,手术时间、术中出血量、VAS评分、Cobb角、最窄处硬膜囊横截面积、硬膜后移位等差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:PLLDH和PLMSF均是治疗多节段DCM的有效手术入路,临床效果满意。然而,与PLLDH相比,PLMSF术后导致更大的颈椎活动度损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched study.

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression and laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Methods: A total of 158 patients for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in this study from May 2018 to December 2023, including 97 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression (PLLDH) and 61 patients treated with posterior lateral mass screw fixation (PLMSF). To minimize potential confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed for inter-group comparison. Neurological function scores and radiographic parameters were systematically compared between the two surgical groups.

Results: Following propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups. The matched cohorts demonstrated that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, VAS scores, Cobb angle, dural sac cross-sectional area at the narrowest level, and posterior dural displacement had no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05). However, significant inter-group differences were observed in JOA scores (P<0.05), NDI scores (P<0.05), and cervical range of motion (P<0.05) postoperatively.

Conclusion: Both PLLDH and PLMSF are effective surgical approaches for treating multilevel DCM, demonstrating satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, PLMSF resulted in greater postoperative loss of cervical mobility compared to PLLDH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信