带有消费级耳机的iOS ipad自动测听应用的有效性和可靠性。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Azza Al-Maskari, Vinayak Hulihalli, Reza Hoseinabadi, Harvey Dillon, Carolyn Mee, Kevin J Munro
{"title":"带有消费级耳机的iOS ipad自动测听应用的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Azza Al-Maskari, Vinayak Hulihalli, Reza Hoseinabadi, Harvey Dillon, Carolyn Mee, Kevin J Munro","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2545439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of the Sound Scouts Automatic Audiometer application and derive Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (ETSPL) values for Sennheiser HD 300 headphones.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, where subjects self-administered automated pure tone audiometry (A-PTA), with HD 300 headphones, and clinicians administered conventional pure-tone audiometry (C-PTA; with GSI Pello audiometer and Radio Ear DD45 headphones), both inside a sound booth. Both tests were repeated, in counterbalanced order, on a different day by a different examiner.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>30 adults aged 23-78 years, with hearing threshold levels from normal to severe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean differences between the two methods were less than 2 dB from 250 to 4000 Hz, but increased substantially at 6000 and 8000 Hz. The two methods were strongly correlated (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) from 500 to 8000 Hz. Test-retest differences and standard deviations were indistinguishable between the two methods. ETSPL values for the HD 300 headphones were derived from the mean threshold differences between A-PTA and C-PTA at each frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automatic audiometer hearing thresholds were easy to obtain and agreed closely with conventional audiometry, except at 6000 and 8000 Hz where the calibration values should be changed to those found in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of an automatic audiometry application for iOS iPads with consumer-grade headphones.\",\"authors\":\"Azza Al-Maskari, Vinayak Hulihalli, Reza Hoseinabadi, Harvey Dillon, Carolyn Mee, Kevin J Munro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2025.2545439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of the Sound Scouts Automatic Audiometer application and derive Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (ETSPL) values for Sennheiser HD 300 headphones.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, where subjects self-administered automated pure tone audiometry (A-PTA), with HD 300 headphones, and clinicians administered conventional pure-tone audiometry (C-PTA; with GSI Pello audiometer and Radio Ear DD45 headphones), both inside a sound booth. Both tests were repeated, in counterbalanced order, on a different day by a different examiner.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>30 adults aged 23-78 years, with hearing threshold levels from normal to severe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean differences between the two methods were less than 2 dB from 250 to 4000 Hz, but increased substantially at 6000 and 8000 Hz. The two methods were strongly correlated (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) from 500 to 8000 Hz. Test-retest differences and standard deviations were indistinguishable between the two methods. ETSPL values for the HD 300 headphones were derived from the mean threshold differences between A-PTA and C-PTA at each frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automatic audiometer hearing thresholds were easy to obtain and agreed closely with conventional audiometry, except at 6000 and 8000 Hz where the calibration values should be changed to those found in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2545439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2545439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨Sound Scouts自动听力计应用程序的有效性和可靠性,并推导出Sennheiser HD 300耳机的等效声压级(ETSPL)值。设计:横断面,受试者自行使用HD 300耳机进行自动纯音测听(A-PTA),临床医生使用常规纯音测听(C-PTA;使用GSI Pello听力计和Radio Ear DD45耳机),两者都在录音棚内。这两项测试在不同的一天由不同的考官以平衡的顺序重复进行。研究样本:30名年龄在23-78岁之间的成年人,听力阈值从正常到严重。结果:在250 ~ 4000 Hz范围内,两种方法之间的平均差异小于2 dB,但在6000和8000 Hz范围内,两种方法之间的平均差异显著增加。结论:自动测听仪的听力阈值易于获得,且与常规测听法非常吻合,但在6000和8000hz时,需要将其校准值更改为本研究中发现的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of an automatic audiometry application for iOS iPads with consumer-grade headphones.

Objective: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Sound Scouts Automatic Audiometer application and derive Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (ETSPL) values for Sennheiser HD 300 headphones.

Design: Cross-sectional, where subjects self-administered automated pure tone audiometry (A-PTA), with HD 300 headphones, and clinicians administered conventional pure-tone audiometry (C-PTA; with GSI Pello audiometer and Radio Ear DD45 headphones), both inside a sound booth. Both tests were repeated, in counterbalanced order, on a different day by a different examiner.

Study sample: 30 adults aged 23-78 years, with hearing threshold levels from normal to severe.

Results: Mean differences between the two methods were less than 2 dB from 250 to 4000 Hz, but increased substantially at 6000 and 8000 Hz. The two methods were strongly correlated (r ≥ 0.78, p < 0.00001) from 500 to 8000 Hz. Test-retest differences and standard deviations were indistinguishable between the two methods. ETSPL values for the HD 300 headphones were derived from the mean threshold differences between A-PTA and C-PTA at each frequency.

Conclusions: Automatic audiometer hearing thresholds were easy to obtain and agreed closely with conventional audiometry, except at 6000 and 8000 Hz where the calibration values should be changed to those found in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信