Navid Delshad , Preethy Paul , Michael Santos Silva , Emrah Yatkin , Mikko Voipio , Senthil Kumar Rajendran , John E. Eriksson
{"title":"异戊二酸和卵泡二内酯的药代动力学、代谢和毒性:临床前研究的给药指导路线。","authors":"Navid Delshad , Preethy Paul , Michael Santos Silva , Emrah Yatkin , Mikko Voipio , Senthil Kumar Rajendran , John E. Eriksson","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) — two diterpenoids from plant <em>Anisomeles malabarica</em>. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key <em>in vitro</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary <em>in vivo</em> PK analyses. <em>In vitro</em> experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent <em>in vivo</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 107235"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies\",\"authors\":\"Navid Delshad , Preethy Paul , Michael Santos Silva , Emrah Yatkin , Mikko Voipio , Senthil Kumar Rajendran , John E. Eriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) — two diterpenoids from plant <em>Anisomeles malabarica</em>. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key <em>in vitro</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary <em>in vivo</em> PK analyses. <em>In vitro</em> experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent <em>in vivo</em> pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies
Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) — two diterpenoids from plant Anisomeles malabarica. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary in vivo PK analyses. In vitro experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development.
More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making.
Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.