儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):基于临床数据的德国儿童和青少年的信度和有效性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Lena Nonnast, Laura Maria Derks, Natalie Deux, Martin Holtmann, Tanja Legenbauer
{"title":"儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):基于临床数据的德国儿童和青少年的信度和有效性。","authors":"Lena Nonnast, Laura Maria Derks, Natalie Deux, Martin Holtmann, Tanja Legenbauer","doi":"10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V, cross-sectional, descriptive study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11391,"journal":{"name":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","volume":"30 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): reliability and validation in German children and adolescents based on clinical data.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Nonnast, Laura Maria Derks, Natalie Deux, Martin Holtmann, Tanja Legenbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>V, cross-sectional, descriptive study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估德语版儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT)在临床样本中的有效性,这是一种国际上使用的检测饮食失调(ED)症状的工具。方法:采用包含26个项目的作弊自述问卷,对在德国某儿童青少年精神科门诊住院治疗的342名青少年(12-18岁)的饮食行为进行调查。通过探索性因素分析(EFA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)和内部一致性检查对ChEAT进行了验证。随后进行分析,以确定与参与者特征相关的差异,包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和诊断。此外,通过补充问卷记录额外的饮食行为、抑郁和焦虑症状,并将其与ChEAT相关,以评估收敛效度和判别效度。结果:通过EFA和CFA验证了ChEAT的析因效度,得到了一个五因素结构:“身体和体重关注”、“节食”、“社会压力”、“排便和暴饮暴食”和“食物关注”。24项模型具有较高的内部一致性,对数据具有可接受的拟合性。作弊的收敛效度和判别效度与其他自述问卷显著相关。在女性和有饮食或抑郁病史的人群中,作弊平均分较高,而年龄和体重指数没有相关性。结论:数据表明,在临床样本中,德国版的ChEAT似乎是一种可靠和有效的识别ED症状的工具。但对因子结构和效度的评估仍需进一步研究。证据水平:V,横断面,描述性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): reliability and validation in German children and adolescents based on clinical data.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample.

Methods: The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity.

Results: The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation.

Conclusion: The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.

Level of evidence: V, cross-sectional, descriptive study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity is a scientific journal whose main purpose is to create an international forum devoted to the several sectors of eating disorders and obesity and the significant relations between them. The journal publishes basic research, clinical and theoretical articles on eating disorders and weight-related problems: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, subthreshold eating disorders, obesity, atypical patterns of eating behaviour and body weight regulation in clinical and non-clinical populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信