米氮平治疗严重呼吸困难多国试验中呼吸系统疾病患者及其护理人员的动机和经历:一项定性研究(BETTER-B)。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Adejoke O Oluyase, Luca Ghirotto, Harry Watson, Massimo Costantini, Sabrina Bajwah, Charles Normand, Silvia Tanzi, Jeremias Bazata, Karen Ryan, Elena Turola, Irene J Higginson, Matthew Maddocks
{"title":"米氮平治疗严重呼吸困难多国试验中呼吸系统疾病患者及其护理人员的动机和经历:一项定性研究(BETTER-B)。","authors":"Adejoke O Oluyase, Luca Ghirotto, Harry Watson, Massimo Costantini, Sabrina Bajwah, Charles Normand, Silvia Tanzi, Jeremias Bazata, Karen Ryan, Elena Turola, Irene J Higginson, Matthew Maddocks","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03862-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug repurposing offers advantages over traditional drug development, such as shorter time and reduced costs. Understanding patient and caregiver perspectives on repurposed medicines is crucial to improving clinical trial design and conduct, especially in advanced disease. We carried out this study in the UK and Italy to explore the experiences and motivations of patients with respiratory diseases and their caregivers who participated in a trial investigating the repurposing of the antidepressant mirtazapine to alleviate severe breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study nested within a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial (BETTER-B: BETter TreatmEnts for Refractory Breathlessness). Purposive sampling ensured diversity in age and gender. Framework analysis was applied. Interviewed participants had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), experienced limiting breathlessness (grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale) and had participated in the trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (13 men and 10 women) and eight caregivers (4 men and 4 women) were interviewed. Of patients (15 COPD, 8 ILD), 22 had completed the trial and one had withdrawn due to adverse effects. Interviews were conducted at home or via the telephone. Two main themes were derived: (1) 'knowledge and views about antidepressants and its use' and (2) 'experience and views on joining the trial'. The patients' perceived need for relief from severe breathlessness and its impact outweighed any concerns about taking an antidepressant. Motivations for trial participation included the potential for benefit, altruism, trust in the healthcare system, and the strength of relationships between patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants willing to accept mirtazapine repurposed for another indication joined this trial regardless of their existing concerns about antidepressants. A clear explanation of trials and possible benefits, plus trust in professionals and the healthcare system, are instrumental in increasing trial participation for repurposed medicines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10487976. Prospectively Registered on 19 November 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivations and experiences of patients with respiratory disease and their caregivers in a multinational trial of mirtazapine for severe breathlessness: a qualitative study (BETTER-B).\",\"authors\":\"Adejoke O Oluyase, Luca Ghirotto, Harry Watson, Massimo Costantini, Sabrina Bajwah, Charles Normand, Silvia Tanzi, Jeremias Bazata, Karen Ryan, Elena Turola, Irene J Higginson, Matthew Maddocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03862-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug repurposing offers advantages over traditional drug development, such as shorter time and reduced costs. Understanding patient and caregiver perspectives on repurposed medicines is crucial to improving clinical trial design and conduct, especially in advanced disease. We carried out this study in the UK and Italy to explore the experiences and motivations of patients with respiratory diseases and their caregivers who participated in a trial investigating the repurposing of the antidepressant mirtazapine to alleviate severe breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study nested within a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial (BETTER-B: BETter TreatmEnts for Refractory Breathlessness). Purposive sampling ensured diversity in age and gender. Framework analysis was applied. Interviewed participants had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), experienced limiting breathlessness (grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale) and had participated in the trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (13 men and 10 women) and eight caregivers (4 men and 4 women) were interviewed. Of patients (15 COPD, 8 ILD), 22 had completed the trial and one had withdrawn due to adverse effects. Interviews were conducted at home or via the telephone. Two main themes were derived: (1) 'knowledge and views about antidepressants and its use' and (2) 'experience and views on joining the trial'. The patients' perceived need for relief from severe breathlessness and its impact outweighed any concerns about taking an antidepressant. Motivations for trial participation included the potential for benefit, altruism, trust in the healthcare system, and the strength of relationships between patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants willing to accept mirtazapine repurposed for another indication joined this trial regardless of their existing concerns about antidepressants. A clear explanation of trials and possible benefits, plus trust in professionals and the healthcare system, are instrumental in increasing trial participation for repurposed medicines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10487976. Prospectively Registered on 19 November 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03862-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03862-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物再利用比传统药物开发具有更短的时间和更低的成本等优势。了解患者和护理人员对重新使用药物的看法对于改进临床试验设计和实施至关重要,特别是在晚期疾病中。我们在英国和意大利开展了这项研究,以探索呼吸系统疾病患者及其护理人员的经历和动机,他们参与了一项研究抗抑郁药米氮平重新用于缓解严重呼吸困难的试验。方法:定性研究嵌套在双盲,安慰剂对照,随机试验(更好的治疗难治性呼吸困难)。有目的的抽样确保了年龄和性别的多样性。采用框架分析。受访的参与者患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或间质性肺疾病(ILD),经历过限制性呼吸困难(修改后的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表的3级或4级),并参加了试验。结果:共访谈23例患者(男13例,女10例)和8例护理人员(男4例,女4例)。在患者(15例COPD, 8例ILD)中,22例完成了试验,1例因不良反应而退出。采访是在家中或通过电话进行的。得出了两个主要主题:(1)“关于抗抑郁药及其使用的知识和观点”和(2)“参加审判的经验和看法”。患者对缓解严重呼吸困难的感知需求及其影响超过了服用抗抑郁药的任何担忧。参与试验的动机包括潜在的利益、利他主义、对医疗保健系统的信任以及患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的关系。结论:愿意接受米氮平改用于其他适应症的参与者加入了这项试验,而不考虑他们对抗抑郁药的现有担忧。对试验和可能的益处的明确解释,加上对专业人员和卫生保健系统的信任,有助于增加对重新利用药物的试验的参与。试验注册:ISRCTN注册中心,ISRCTN10487976。预期于2019年11月19日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivations and experiences of patients with respiratory disease and their caregivers in a multinational trial of mirtazapine for severe breathlessness: a qualitative study (BETTER-B).

Background: Drug repurposing offers advantages over traditional drug development, such as shorter time and reduced costs. Understanding patient and caregiver perspectives on repurposed medicines is crucial to improving clinical trial design and conduct, especially in advanced disease. We carried out this study in the UK and Italy to explore the experiences and motivations of patients with respiratory diseases and their caregivers who participated in a trial investigating the repurposing of the antidepressant mirtazapine to alleviate severe breathlessness.

Methods: Qualitative study nested within a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial (BETTER-B: BETter TreatmEnts for Refractory Breathlessness). Purposive sampling ensured diversity in age and gender. Framework analysis was applied. Interviewed participants had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), experienced limiting breathlessness (grade 3 or 4 of the modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale) and had participated in the trial.

Results: Twenty-three patients (13 men and 10 women) and eight caregivers (4 men and 4 women) were interviewed. Of patients (15 COPD, 8 ILD), 22 had completed the trial and one had withdrawn due to adverse effects. Interviews were conducted at home or via the telephone. Two main themes were derived: (1) 'knowledge and views about antidepressants and its use' and (2) 'experience and views on joining the trial'. The patients' perceived need for relief from severe breathlessness and its impact outweighed any concerns about taking an antidepressant. Motivations for trial participation included the potential for benefit, altruism, trust in the healthcare system, and the strength of relationships between patients and healthcare professionals.

Conclusions: Participants willing to accept mirtazapine repurposed for another indication joined this trial regardless of their existing concerns about antidepressants. A clear explanation of trials and possible benefits, plus trust in professionals and the healthcare system, are instrumental in increasing trial participation for repurposed medicines.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10487976. Prospectively Registered on 19 November 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信