造血干细胞供体在捐献后第一年的信息和副作用的经验-一项瑞典国家研究

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Annika M. Kisch, Jeanette Winterling, Hans Hägglund, Gunnar Larfors, Stig Lenhoff, Simon Pahnke
{"title":"造血干细胞供体在捐献后第一年的信息和副作用的经验-一项瑞典国家研究","authors":"Annika M. Kisch,&nbsp;Jeanette Winterling,&nbsp;Hans Hägglund,&nbsp;Gunnar Larfors,&nbsp;Stig Lenhoff,&nbsp;Simon Pahnke","doi":"10.1002/jca.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side-Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study\",\"authors\":\"Annika M. Kisch,&nbsp;Jeanette Winterling,&nbsp;Hans Hägglund,&nbsp;Gunnar Larfors,&nbsp;Stig Lenhoff,&nbsp;Simon Pahnke\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是描述造血干细胞(HSC)捐赠者的经历,重点是捐赠后第一年的信息和副作用。我们的前瞻性瑞典队列研究于2019年至2022年对成人HSC捐赠者进行,在捐赠前至捐赠后12个月的四个时间点进行问卷调查。173名非亲属献血者和68名亲属献血者参与了这项研究,其中大部分捐献了外周血干细胞。除一人外,所有人都将自己的捐赠经历评为“好”或“非常好”。83%的参与者报告了至少一种副作用。6名供体(2.5%)要么出现了大量副作用,要么至少出现了一种严重副作用,要么出现了长期副作用。有严重副作用的献血者和骨髓献血者对信息的满意度较低。在有严重副作用的献血者和无亲属的献血者中,对捐赠的总体满意度较低。献血者普遍对捐献前的信息感到满意。大多数副作用在2周内消失,这加强了在捐赠后1个月对捐赠者进行不变随访的理由,对持续症状的捐赠者进行个体化随访。似乎有必要进一步了解更严重或更持久副作用的风险,并应评估其对供体满意度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side-Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side-Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study

The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信