Annika M. Kisch, Jeanette Winterling, Hans Hägglund, Gunnar Larfors, Stig Lenhoff, Simon Pahnke
{"title":"造血干细胞供体在捐献后第一年的信息和副作用的经验-一项瑞典国家研究","authors":"Annika M. Kisch, Jeanette Winterling, Hans Hägglund, Gunnar Larfors, Stig Lenhoff, Simon Pahnke","doi":"10.1002/jca.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side-Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study\",\"authors\":\"Annika M. Kisch, Jeanette Winterling, Hans Hägglund, Gunnar Larfors, Stig Lenhoff, Simon Pahnke\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side-Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study
The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.