{"title":"评估干旱和半干旱地区作物系数变异性:一种元分析方法","authors":"Bita Moravejalahkami","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Accurate determination of crop coefficients (<em>Kc</em>) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating <em>Kc</em> values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate <em>Kc</em> values across different growth stages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Meta-analysis parameters (<em>Q</em> and <em>H²</em>) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while <em>I²</em> and <em>τ²</em> reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The <em>p-value (<0.05)</em> confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of <em>Kc</em> values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local <em>Kc</em> versus revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced <em>Kc</em> measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 110101"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing crop coefficient variability in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analytic approach\",\"authors\":\"Bita Moravejalahkami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Accurate determination of crop coefficients (<em>Kc</em>) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating <em>Kc</em> values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate <em>Kc</em> values across different growth stages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Meta-analysis parameters (<em>Q</em> and <em>H²</em>) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while <em>I²</em> and <em>τ²</em> reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The <em>p-value (<0.05)</em> confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of <em>Kc</em> values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local <em>Kc</em> versus revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced <em>Kc</em> measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"333 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025003661\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025003661","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing crop coefficient variability in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analytic approach
Context
Accurate determination of crop coefficients (Kc) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.
Objective
This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating Kc values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.
Methods
Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate Kc values across different growth stages.
Results
Meta-analysis parameters (Q and H²) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while I² and τ² reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The p-value (<0.05) confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of Kc values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local Kc versus revised FAO-56 Kc values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 Kc values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.
Conclusions
This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced Kc measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.
期刊介绍:
Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on:
√ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels
on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems,
with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.