评估干旱和半干旱地区作物系数变异性:一种元分析方法

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Bita Moravejalahkami
{"title":"评估干旱和半干旱地区作物系数变异性:一种元分析方法","authors":"Bita Moravejalahkami","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Accurate determination of crop coefficients (<em>Kc</em>) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating <em>Kc</em> values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate <em>Kc</em> values across different growth stages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Meta-analysis parameters (<em>Q</em> and <em>H²</em>) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while <em>I²</em> and <em>τ²</em> reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The <em>p-value (&lt;0.05)</em> confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of <em>Kc</em> values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local <em>Kc</em> versus revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced <em>Kc</em> measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 110101"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing crop coefficient variability in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analytic approach\",\"authors\":\"Bita Moravejalahkami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Accurate determination of crop coefficients (<em>Kc</em>) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating <em>Kc</em> values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate <em>Kc</em> values across different growth stages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Meta-analysis parameters (<em>Q</em> and <em>H²</em>) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while <em>I²</em> and <em>τ²</em> reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The <em>p-value (&lt;0.05)</em> confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of <em>Kc</em> values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local <em>Kc</em> versus revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 <em>Kc</em> values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced <em>Kc</em> measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"333 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025003661\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025003661","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确测定作物系数(Kc)对于估算作物需水量和改善灌溉系统至关重要。本研究批判性地评估了在干旱和半干旱气候下估计主要作物(水稻、棉花、玉米和马铃薯)Kc值的工程方法。方法按照PRISMA方案,选取28篇研究,按植物类型在标准条件下分类。采用荟萃分析方法评估不同生长阶段的Kc值。结果meta分析参数(Q和H²)表明各研究间存在显著异质性,而I²和τ²分别反映真实异质性和方差。p值(<0.05)证实了这种异质性的统计学意义。这一发现强调了考虑当地因素——例如灌溉方法和作物品种的变化——以提高Kc值的可靠性的重要性。此外,使用当地Kc值与经修订的FAO-56 Kc值估算的需水量差异(例如,棉花初始生长为- 65 %至+35 %,晚季马铃薯生长为- 34.2% %至- 18.4 %)表明,使用经修订的FAO-56 Kc值而不考虑当地因素(如作物品种)可能导致显著的估算误差。本研究确定了当前方法中的关键差距,并揭示了相似气候条件下研究的显著异质性。最值得注意的问题是,在使用经修订的FAO-56作物系数时,高估了作物需水量,这导致施用水量增加,而没有提高作物产量。未来的研究应侧重于开发先进的Kc测量技术,以改进作物需水量估算,满足水资源管理中的关键工程需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing crop coefficient variability in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analytic approach

Context

Accurate determination of crop coefficients (Kc) is crucial for estimating crop water requirements and improving irrigation systems.

Objective

This study critically evaluates engineering methodologies for estimating Kc values for major crops (rice, cotton, maize, and potato) in arid and semi-arid climates.

Methods

Following the PRISMA protocol, 28 studies were selected and categorized by plant type under standard conditions. A meta-analysis approach was applied to evaluate Kc values across different growth stages.

Results

Meta-analysis parameters (Q and ) indicated notable heterogeneity among studies, while and τ² reflected true heterogeneity and variance, respectively. The p-value (<0.05) confirms the statistical significance of this heterogeneity. The findings emphasize the importance of considering local factors- such as irrigation methods and crop cultivar variations—to enhance the reliability of Kc values. Moreover, discrepancies in estimated water requirements using local Kc versus revised FAO-56 Kc values (e.g., −65 % to +35 % for initial cotton growth and −34.2 % to −18.4 % for late-season potato growth) suggest that employing revised FAO-56 Kc values without considering local factors, such as crop cultivar, can lead to significant estimation errors.

Conclusions

This study identifies key gaps in current methodologies and reveals significant heterogeneity across studies in similar climatic conditions. The most notable issue is the overestimation of crop water requirements when using revised FAO-56 crop coefficients, which leads to increased applied water volumes without improving crop yield. Future research should focus on developing advanced Kc measurement techniques to improve crop water requirement estimates and meet critical engineering needs in water resource management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信