麻醉学里程碑1.0:住院医师的学习轨迹和培训结果。

Tianpeng Ye,Huaping Sun,Ann E Harman,Stacie G Deiner,John D Mitchell,Alex Macario
{"title":"麻醉学里程碑1.0:住院医师的学习轨迹和培训结果。","authors":"Tianpeng Ye,Huaping Sun,Ann E Harman,Stacie G Deiner,John D Mitchell,Alex Macario","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires anesthesiology training programs to submit Milestones ratings for each resident every 6 months, starting in the 2014 to 2015 academic year. We aimed to understand how anesthesiology residents progress through the Milestones evaluations from residency entry to graduation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAnesthesiology Milestones 1.0 included 25 subcompetencies in 6 core competencies of Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Systems-Based Practice, Practice-Based Learning & Improvement, Professionalism, and Interpersonal & Communication Skills. Milestones data from all anesthesiology residency programs from July 2015 to June 2019 were used to (1) assess the prevalence of straight-lining (ie, percentage of residents who received the same rating for all 25 subcompetencies for each program per reporting period), (2) describe residents' progression trajectories in each subcompetency, including the baseline at 6-month training, growth rate (ie, rate increase every 12 months), and outcomes on graduation (ie, percentage of residency graduates who received at least 1 Level 4 [target for graduation] or above subcompetency rating, and percentage of graduates who did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency), and (3) use 3-level linear mixed-effect models to examine individual resident growth in each subcompetency over time while accounting for clustering effect of residency programs.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe analyses included 11,691 residents from 153 training programs. Among 6696 clinical anesthesia year 3 residents, 98.3% received at least 1 Level 4 or above rating on graduation; 28.8% to 36.8% of the graduating cohort did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency among the 6 core competencies. One hundred and thirty-six programs (88.9% of 153) had straight-lining for at least 1 reporting period. For the multilevel linear mixed-effect models, the fixed intercept estimates were close to 1.0 for Professionalism and Interpersonal & Communication Skills subcompetencies while those for Patient Care subcompetencies were <0.75; the fixed slope estimates were near 1.0 for all 25 subcompetencies. Across all subcompetencies, residency programs accounted for 63% to 84% of between-resident variability in the baseline ratings and 60% to 92% of between-resident variability in the growth rates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe found a high prevalence of straight-lining in Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0 ratings. This raises concerns about whether Milestones evaluations reflect individual resident performance in specific domains. The programs explained most of the between-resident variability in both baseline ratings and growth rates. Future studies are needed to promote standardization and consistency of Milestones evaluations, allowing learners to track their progress and target specific areas to improve performance.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0: Residents' Learning Trajectories and Training Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Tianpeng Ye,Huaping Sun,Ann E Harman,Stacie G Deiner,John D Mitchell,Alex Macario\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires anesthesiology training programs to submit Milestones ratings for each resident every 6 months, starting in the 2014 to 2015 academic year. We aimed to understand how anesthesiology residents progress through the Milestones evaluations from residency entry to graduation.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAnesthesiology Milestones 1.0 included 25 subcompetencies in 6 core competencies of Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Systems-Based Practice, Practice-Based Learning & Improvement, Professionalism, and Interpersonal & Communication Skills. Milestones data from all anesthesiology residency programs from July 2015 to June 2019 were used to (1) assess the prevalence of straight-lining (ie, percentage of residents who received the same rating for all 25 subcompetencies for each program per reporting period), (2) describe residents' progression trajectories in each subcompetency, including the baseline at 6-month training, growth rate (ie, rate increase every 12 months), and outcomes on graduation (ie, percentage of residency graduates who received at least 1 Level 4 [target for graduation] or above subcompetency rating, and percentage of graduates who did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency), and (3) use 3-level linear mixed-effect models to examine individual resident growth in each subcompetency over time while accounting for clustering effect of residency programs.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe analyses included 11,691 residents from 153 training programs. Among 6696 clinical anesthesia year 3 residents, 98.3% received at least 1 Level 4 or above rating on graduation; 28.8% to 36.8% of the graduating cohort did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency among the 6 core competencies. One hundred and thirty-six programs (88.9% of 153) had straight-lining for at least 1 reporting period. For the multilevel linear mixed-effect models, the fixed intercept estimates were close to 1.0 for Professionalism and Interpersonal & Communication Skills subcompetencies while those for Patient Care subcompetencies were <0.75; the fixed slope estimates were near 1.0 for all 25 subcompetencies. Across all subcompetencies, residency programs accounted for 63% to 84% of between-resident variability in the baseline ratings and 60% to 92% of between-resident variability in the growth rates.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWe found a high prevalence of straight-lining in Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0 ratings. This raises concerns about whether Milestones evaluations reflect individual resident performance in specific domains. The programs explained most of the between-resident variability in both baseline ratings and growth rates. Future studies are needed to promote standardization and consistency of Milestones evaluations, allowing learners to track their progress and target specific areas to improve performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)要求麻醉学培训项目从2014学年到2015学年开始,每6个月向每位住院医师提交里程碑评分。我们旨在了解麻醉科住院医师如何通过里程碑评估从住院医师入职到毕业。方法“美学里程碑1.0”包括患者护理、医学知识、系统实践、实践学习与改进、专业精神、人际与沟通能力6个核心能力,共25个子能力。从2015年7月到2019年6月,所有麻醉学住院医师项目的里程碑数据被用于(1)评估直线化的流行程度(即每个报告期每个项目的所有25个子能力获得相同评级的住院医生的百分比),(2)描述住院医生在每个子能力方面的进展轨迹,包括6个月培训的基线、增长率(即每12个月的增长率)和毕业时的结果(即:(3)在考虑住院医师项目的聚类效应的情况下,使用3级线性混合效应模型,考察住院医师个人在每一个子能力上随时间的增长情况。结果分析包括来自153个培训项目的11,691名住院医师。在6696名临床麻醉三年级住院医师中,98.3%在毕业时获得至少1个4级或以上评分;在6项核心胜任力中,有28.8%至36.8%的毕业生在至少一项次胜任力上达不到第4级。136个项目(153个项目中的88.9%)至少在一个报告期内实行了直线教学。对于多水平线性混合效应模型,专业精神和人际与沟通技巧子胜任力的固定截距估计接近1.0,而患者护理子胜任力的固定截距估计<0.75;所有25个子能力的固定斜率估计接近1.0。在所有次能力中,住院医师项目占基线评分中住院医师差异的63%至84%,占增长率中住院医师差异的60%至92%。结论:我们发现在麻醉里程碑1.0评分中,直排的发生率很高。这引起了人们的关注,即里程碑评估是否反映了个别居民在特定领域的表现。这些项目解释了大部分居民之间在基线评分和增长率方面的差异。未来的研究需要促进里程碑评估的标准化和一致性,使学习者能够跟踪他们的进步,并针对特定领域提高表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0: Residents' Learning Trajectories and Training Outcomes.
BACKGROUND The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires anesthesiology training programs to submit Milestones ratings for each resident every 6 months, starting in the 2014 to 2015 academic year. We aimed to understand how anesthesiology residents progress through the Milestones evaluations from residency entry to graduation. METHODS Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0 included 25 subcompetencies in 6 core competencies of Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, Systems-Based Practice, Practice-Based Learning & Improvement, Professionalism, and Interpersonal & Communication Skills. Milestones data from all anesthesiology residency programs from July 2015 to June 2019 were used to (1) assess the prevalence of straight-lining (ie, percentage of residents who received the same rating for all 25 subcompetencies for each program per reporting period), (2) describe residents' progression trajectories in each subcompetency, including the baseline at 6-month training, growth rate (ie, rate increase every 12 months), and outcomes on graduation (ie, percentage of residency graduates who received at least 1 Level 4 [target for graduation] or above subcompetency rating, and percentage of graduates who did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency), and (3) use 3-level linear mixed-effect models to examine individual resident growth in each subcompetency over time while accounting for clustering effect of residency programs. RESULTS The analyses included 11,691 residents from 153 training programs. Among 6696 clinical anesthesia year 3 residents, 98.3% received at least 1 Level 4 or above rating on graduation; 28.8% to 36.8% of the graduating cohort did not reach Level 4 for at least 1 subcompetency among the 6 core competencies. One hundred and thirty-six programs (88.9% of 153) had straight-lining for at least 1 reporting period. For the multilevel linear mixed-effect models, the fixed intercept estimates were close to 1.0 for Professionalism and Interpersonal & Communication Skills subcompetencies while those for Patient Care subcompetencies were <0.75; the fixed slope estimates were near 1.0 for all 25 subcompetencies. Across all subcompetencies, residency programs accounted for 63% to 84% of between-resident variability in the baseline ratings and 60% to 92% of between-resident variability in the growth rates. CONCLUSIONS We found a high prevalence of straight-lining in Anesthesiology Milestones 1.0 ratings. This raises concerns about whether Milestones evaluations reflect individual resident performance in specific domains. The programs explained most of the between-resident variability in both baseline ratings and growth rates. Future studies are needed to promote standardization and consistency of Milestones evaluations, allowing learners to track their progress and target specific areas to improve performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信