Christian Bayerl,Jonas Kaufmann,Giulia Metzger,Julian M M Rogasch,Holger Amthauer,Imke Schatka,Winfried Brenner,Markus van der Giet,Christian Furth
{"title":"[18F]FDG PET/CT在腹膜后纤维化治疗监测及进展预测中的应用。","authors":"Christian Bayerl,Jonas Kaufmann,Giulia Metzger,Julian M M Rogasch,Holger Amthauer,Imke Schatka,Winfried Brenner,Markus van der Giet,Christian Furth","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07479-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nRetroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare inflammatory disease, that, if left untreated, can lead to ureteral obstruction and subsequent renal impairment. First-line treatment is prednisolone, with rituximab, often used for refractory cases. This study evaluates treatment response in both [18F]FDG PET and CT, and potential baseline parameters for early prediction of progression.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n50 patients with RPF underwent at least two [18F]FDG PET/CT scans (baseline, BL, and first follow-up, FU1), 36 patients a second (FU2), 18 patients a third follow-up (FU3). PET parameters SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, metabolic active volume (MAV), thickness (CTrim) and cranio-caudal extension (CTcc) of the retroperitoneal mass were measured. Therapy groups were divided into prednisolone, rituximab and the combination of both.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll PET parameters showed significant correlations with CTrim at all four timepoints. After therapy all PET parameters and CTrim decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.021). Highly significant metabolic and morphologic response was seen in the prednisolone (p ≤ 0.003) and the combination therapy group (p ≤ 0.001). At FU2, eight patients showed progression, with MAV as a good predictor of progression in BL (p = 0.041; 217.33 versus 100.86 ml). At FU2, SUVmax, SUVpeak and MAV differed significantly between progression and non-progression group (p ≤ 0.009), while CT showed no significant differences.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nOur findings underscore the superiority of PET against CT in therapy monitoring of RPF, especially in the detection of progression at FU2. Higher BL MAV correlated with progression at FU2, indicating its potential as a predictive marker. Still, especially when PET is not available, CT can be considered for initial therapy monitoring.","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[18F]FDG PET/CT for treatment monitoring and prediction of progression in retroperitoneal fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Bayerl,Jonas Kaufmann,Giulia Metzger,Julian M M Rogasch,Holger Amthauer,Imke Schatka,Winfried Brenner,Markus van der Giet,Christian Furth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-025-07479-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nRetroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare inflammatory disease, that, if left untreated, can lead to ureteral obstruction and subsequent renal impairment. First-line treatment is prednisolone, with rituximab, often used for refractory cases. This study evaluates treatment response in both [18F]FDG PET and CT, and potential baseline parameters for early prediction of progression.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\n50 patients with RPF underwent at least two [18F]FDG PET/CT scans (baseline, BL, and first follow-up, FU1), 36 patients a second (FU2), 18 patients a third follow-up (FU3). PET parameters SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, metabolic active volume (MAV), thickness (CTrim) and cranio-caudal extension (CTcc) of the retroperitoneal mass were measured. Therapy groups were divided into prednisolone, rituximab and the combination of both.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAll PET parameters showed significant correlations with CTrim at all four timepoints. After therapy all PET parameters and CTrim decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.021). Highly significant metabolic and morphologic response was seen in the prednisolone (p ≤ 0.003) and the combination therapy group (p ≤ 0.001). At FU2, eight patients showed progression, with MAV as a good predictor of progression in BL (p = 0.041; 217.33 versus 100.86 ml). At FU2, SUVmax, SUVpeak and MAV differed significantly between progression and non-progression group (p ≤ 0.009), while CT showed no significant differences.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nOur findings underscore the superiority of PET against CT in therapy monitoring of RPF, especially in the detection of progression at FU2. Higher BL MAV correlated with progression at FU2, indicating its potential as a predictive marker. Still, especially when PET is not available, CT can be considered for initial therapy monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07479-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07479-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
[18F]FDG PET/CT for treatment monitoring and prediction of progression in retroperitoneal fibrosis.
PURPOSE
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare inflammatory disease, that, if left untreated, can lead to ureteral obstruction and subsequent renal impairment. First-line treatment is prednisolone, with rituximab, often used for refractory cases. This study evaluates treatment response in both [18F]FDG PET and CT, and potential baseline parameters for early prediction of progression.
METHODS
50 patients with RPF underwent at least two [18F]FDG PET/CT scans (baseline, BL, and first follow-up, FU1), 36 patients a second (FU2), 18 patients a third follow-up (FU3). PET parameters SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, metabolic active volume (MAV), thickness (CTrim) and cranio-caudal extension (CTcc) of the retroperitoneal mass were measured. Therapy groups were divided into prednisolone, rituximab and the combination of both.
RESULTS
All PET parameters showed significant correlations with CTrim at all four timepoints. After therapy all PET parameters and CTrim decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.021). Highly significant metabolic and morphologic response was seen in the prednisolone (p ≤ 0.003) and the combination therapy group (p ≤ 0.001). At FU2, eight patients showed progression, with MAV as a good predictor of progression in BL (p = 0.041; 217.33 versus 100.86 ml). At FU2, SUVmax, SUVpeak and MAV differed significantly between progression and non-progression group (p ≤ 0.009), while CT showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION
Our findings underscore the superiority of PET against CT in therapy monitoring of RPF, especially in the detection of progression at FU2. Higher BL MAV correlated with progression at FU2, indicating its potential as a predictive marker. Still, especially when PET is not available, CT can be considered for initial therapy monitoring.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.